Baseline Land Use Conditions Sample Clauses

Baseline Land Use Conditions. That which existed for Year 2001 for Big and Little Papillion Creeks and its tributaries (excluding West Papillion Creek) and for Year 2004 for West Papillion Creek and its tributaries.
View SourceView Similar (6)
Baseline Land Use Conditions. That which existed for Year 2001 for Big and Little Papillion Creeks and its tributaries (excluding West Papillion Creek) and for Year 2004 for West Papillion Creek and its tributaries. That which existed in 2007 for all areas not within the Papillion Creek Watershed. 1) Time is of the essence for policy development and implementation: a) Under the existing NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permits for MS4s, issued by the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality, permitees must develop strategies, which include a combination of structural and/or non-structural best management practices for managing non-point source pollution. The current Stormwater Management Plan was developed by the PCWP in 2017 and fully implemented in 2018. b) The S&ID platting process is typically several years ahead of full occupation of an S&ID. Therefore, careful pre-emptive planning and program implementation is necessary in order to construct regional stormwater detention and water quality basin improvements in a timely manner to meet the purposes intended and to avoid conflicts from land use encroachments from advancing development. 2) Financing to meet capital and O&M obligations for stormwater management projects requires a comprehensive, uniformly applied approach and not a project-by-project approach. Stormwater Management Elements Shared by the Papillion Creek Watershed Partnership A. Public Education and Outreach Lead Partnership Member(s) B. Public Participation and Involvement Lead Partnership Member(s) C. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Lead Partnership Member(s) D. Construction Site Runoff Lead Partnership Member(s) E. Post Construction Runoff Control Lead Partnership Member(s) F. Pollution Prevention and Good Housekeeping Lead Partnership Member(s)
View SourceView Similar (3)
Baseline Land Use Conditions. That which existed for Year 2001 for Big and Little Papillion Creeks and its tributaries (excluding West Papillion Creek) and for Year 2004 for West Papillion Creek and its tributaries. That which existed in 2007 for all areas not within the Papillion Creek Watershed. 1) Time is of the essence for policy development and implementation: a) Under the existing Phase II Stormwater Permits issued by the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality, permitees must develop strategies, which include a combination of structural and/or non-structural best management practices and incorporate them into existing Comprehensive Development Plans by the end of 2009. b) The S&ID platting process is typically several years ahead of full occupation of an S&ID. Therefore, careful pre-emptive planning and program implementation is necessary in order to construct regional stormwater detention and water quality basin improvements in a timely manner to meet the purposes intended and to avoid conflicts from land use encroachments from advancing development. 2) Financing to meet capital and O&M obligations for stormwater management projects requires a comprehensive, uniformly applied approach and not a project-by-project approach. Stormwater Management Elements Shared by the Papillion Creek Watershed Partnershi 1.01 Education and Outreach Program City of Omaha, PMRNRD 1.02 Public Awareness Activities City of Omaha 1.03 Stormwater Website City of Omaha 2.01 Stormwater Hotline and Website City of Omaha 2.02 Create Stormwater Event City of Omaha, PMRNRD 2.03 Participation Events City of Omaha 3.04 Track IDDE complaints City of Omaha 3.05 Education and Training for IDDE Program City of Omaha 4.01 Maintain Construction Site Reporting Website City of Omaha
View SourceView Similar (2)
Baseline Land Use Conditions. That which existed for Year 2001 for Big and Little Papillion Creeks and its tributaries (excluding West Papillion Creek) and for Year 2004 for West Papillion Creek and its tributaries. That which existed in 2007 for all areas not within the Papillion Creek Watershed. 1) Time is of the essence for policy development and implementation: a) Under the existing Phase II Stormwater Permits issued by the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality, permitees must develop strategies, which include a combination of structural and/or non-structural best management practices and incorporate them into existing Comprehensive Development Plans by the end of 2009. b) The S&ID platting process is typically several years ahead of full occupation of an S&ID. Therefore, careful pre-emptive planning and program implementation is necessary in order to construct regional stormwater detention and water quality basin improvements in a timely manner to meet the purposes intended and to avoid conflicts from land use encroachments from advancing development. 2) Financing to meet capital and O&M obligations for stormwater management projects requires a comprehensive, uniformly applied approach and not a project-by-project approach. Stormwater Management Elements Shared by the Partnership 1. A Household Hazardous Waste Public Info City of Omaha 1.B Public Service Announcements (PSAs) P-MRNRD 1. E Pet Waste Outreach City of Omaha
View Source
Baseline Land Use Conditions. The pre-developed conditions which existed in Year 2014.
View Source

Related to Baseline Land Use Conditions

  • Subsurface Conditions Unless the Contract Documents stipulate specific quantities and units of rock or unsuitable soils, the Contractor shall assume material below the surface of the Earth to be earth and other material that can be removed by power shovel or similar equipment. Should conditions encountered below the surface of the ground be at variance to the number of unit requirements as indicated by drawings or specifications, and absent an agreed-upon unit price established prior to the bid by Addendum, or after contract execution by Change Order, the Contract Sum and/or time shall be adjusted as provided in the Contract Documents for changes in the work.

  • License Conditions Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the following conditions.

  • ADDITIONAL SPECIAL CONTRACT CONDITIONS Special Contract Conditions revisions: the corresponding subsections of the Special Contract Conditions referenced below are replaced in their entirety with the following:

  • Service Conditions Customer acknowledges that in the event of a service issue, Customer is responsible for on-site cooperative testing with LightEdge Technical Support to assist in the diagnosis of the trouble. Customer agrees to be bound to current terms of LightEdge Acceptable Use Policy. Terms of the Acceptable Use Policy are subject to change without notice. Current Acceptable Use Policy can be found here: ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/legal Customer agrees that any service complaints including concerns regarding level of support, products, service reliability, or any other concerns related to LightEdge or Services being provided by LIghtEdge will be communicated to LightEdge by sending an email to ▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇.

  • Unsafe Conditions In accordance with 29 CFR § 1977, occasions might arise when an employee is confronted with a choice between not performing assigned tasks or subjecting himself/herself to serious injury or death arising from a hazardous condition at the workplace. If the employee, with no reasonable alternative, refuses in good faith to expose himself/herself to the dangerous condition, he/she would be protected against subsequent discrimination. The condition causing the employee's apprehension of death or injury must be of such a nature that a reasonable person, under the circumstances then confronting the employee, would conclude that there is a real danger of death or serious injury and that there is insufficient time, due to the urgency of the situation, to eliminate the danger by resorting to regular statutory enforcement channels. In addition, in such circumstances, the employee, where possible, must also have sought from his Employer, and been unable to obtain, a correction of the dangerous condition.