BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES Sample Clauses

The BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES clause establishes the requirements for citing sources and materials referenced within a document or agreement. It typically outlines the format and style to be used for citations, such as specifying a particular citation style (e.g., APA, MLA) or providing a list of required information for each reference. This clause ensures that all referenced works are properly acknowledged, promoting transparency, academic integrity, and allowing readers to locate the original sources if needed.
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES. 1. Directive 2003/94/EC on GMP for Medicinal Products for Human Use.
View SourceView Similar (4)
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES. 1. EU Clinical Trial Directive 2001 / 20 / EC 2. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guidelines: E6 Guideline for Good Clinical Practice 3. Ipsen Group R&D SOP GCP030 Management of Study Manuals 4. Ipsen Group R&D SOP GCP089 Monitoring of Clinical Trial Sites 5. Ipsen Group R&D SOP GCP090 Close-out of Clinical Trial Sites US INDs —None Other EU CTAs — No EU CTAs. A deposition (notification) for the phase 1 study conducted in 2004 by Ipsen was submitted in Germany January 23 2004 (see attached). The registration number received from the BfArM acknowledging receipt of this deposition was 4021410 (see attached original and English translation). Subsequent correspondence February 26 2004 (see attached) from MDS Pharma Services to the BfArM notified the Authority of BIM44058 Toxicology and Safety Pharmacology studies completed and sponsored by Ipsen Regulatory (market) approvals - None Postanschrift: EINGEGANGEN ▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇-Kiesinger-Allee 3 MDS Pharma Services D-53175 Bonn z.Hd. Herrn ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ 26. Jan. 2004 Telefon: (0228) 207 - 30 Arnikastr. 4 Telefax: (0228) 207 - 5207 IVBB: 01888 - 307 - 85635 Hohenkirchen e-mail: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇ Ihre Zeichen und Nachricht vom Gesch.Z.: [ILLEGIBLE] Telefon: (0228) 207- Bonn 7140-00-37/Z 172.10/12 5845 23.01.2004 Ihre Unterlagen vom 15.01.2004 sind am 19.01.2004 bei uns eingegangen: Voriagenummer: 4021410 Name der Studie: 2-52-52127-001 Wir bitten, bei weiteren Einreichungen zu diesem prüfplan sowie bei ▇▇▇▇▇ Anzeigen von Verdachtsfällen auf schwerwiegende unerwünschte Arzneimittelwirkungen gemäß § 29 (1) AMG stets die Vorlagenummer anzugèben. Mit freundlichen Grüssen Im Auftrag [ILLEGIBLE] [ILLEGIBLE] Postanschrift: MDS Pharma Services EINGEGANCEN ▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇-Kiesinger-Allee 3 Germany GmbH D-53175 Bonn Herrn ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ 02. Feb. 2004 Telefon: (01888) - 307 - 0 Arnikastraße 4 (0228) 207 - 30 Telefax: (01888) - 307 - 5207 (0228) 207 - 5207 85635 Höhenkirchen/Siegertsbrunn Nachrichtlich e-mail: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇ Landesbehörden Bayern / Hamburg vorab per Fax: 08102/4007 Ihre Zelchen and Nachricht ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇.Z: [ILLEGIBLE] Telefon: (01888) 307- Bonn 15.01. 2004 B VP2. A-7140-00-37/ 4320 29. JAN. 2004 4021410
View SourceView Similar (3)
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES. 15.1 Argentina presented a request relating to the use of bibliographic references. This followed discussions held in previous meetings, where Argentina proposed that a formula based on the one applied to maps published by the United Nations be included as a footnote in the documents. The footnote would be: “The bibliographic and documentary references included in this paper have been made for exclusively scientific purposes and do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the legal status of any country, territory, city or any area, or of its authorities”. 15.2 Brazil, Chile, Ecuador and Uruguay supported Argentina’s request. 15.3 The UK stated that it believed that Resolution 2.9 paragraph 4, adopted by the Meeting of Parties at their second session (MoP2), covers the majority of this issue. With the discovery of the mis-translation of the text from English to Spanish, UK suggested that Argentina reflect upon this and review their position on this issue. The UK noted that corrected versions of the Spanish (and French) texts have now been prepared, and had been circulated to all Parties, hoping that these corrected texts will ensure no further misunderstandings on this issue. 15.4 Australia noted the proposed changes would appear to modify the operation of Resolution 2.9, which would be a matter for consideration by the Meeting of the Parties. 15.5 New Zealand also expressed concerns about the interaction of this proposal with Resolution 2.9. 15.6 Argentina noted that discrepancies in views are not related to the mis- translation issue, given that the proposal was developed on the basis of the text in the English version of Resolution 2.9. 15.7 Argentina noted that should new Parties be added to the Agreement, this deliberately general-nature text will serve to protect authors´ rights as well as for issues not concerning strictly scientific items. 15.8 The Advisory Committee Chair noted that no paper had been tabled for AC9 and consequently, the lack of a detailed proposal in advance of the meeting did not allow a full consideration at this meeting. 15.9 Argentina agreed to present a proposal on bibliographic references at AC10 in the form of a working document in order to be fully considered by the AC.
View SourceView Similar (2)
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES. 20.1 Argentina noted the importance of this matter and the support of other delegations for this agenda item in previous meetings. Argentina confirmed that it will submit a paper on this topic to MoP6.
View Source
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES. 7.13.1 The MoP agreed that the following disclaimer should be added as a footnote to the cover page of scientific/academic papers that are issued by the Secretariat or its organs, that include reference to disputed territories, and that are authored by entities other than (1) the Secretariat and its organs; (2) the Parties; (3) the non-Party Range States; and (4) observers (e.g. NGOs): ‘Noting Article XIII(1)(c) of the Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels, the references included in the present document are made exclusively for academic/scientific purposes and have no implications whatsoever for recognition of territorial sovereignty or the legal status of a state, territory, area, or their authorities, where relevant.’
View Source
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES. Adamus Resource Assessment, Inc. 1987. Juneau Wetlands Functions and Values. Prepared for the City and Borough of Juneau, Department of Community Development. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 1999. Standard Guide for Assessment of Wetland Functions. Subcommittee E50.05.
View Source
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES. 1. EU Clinical Trial Directive 2001 / 20 / EC 2. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guidelines: E6 Guideline for Good Clinical Practice
View Source
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES. 15.1 The AC Chair informed the meeting that a disclaimer on bibliographic references was agreed at MoP6, and that this footnote had been implemented by the Secretariat for papers submitted to SBWG9 and PaCSWG5. 15.2 Argentina acknowledged that a lot of progress had been made on this and related issues at MoP6, and in general was pleased with the balanced approach achieved. However, it believes that the footnote was intended to not only refer to bibliographic references, but also to any reference or mention of disputed territories elsewhere in the text of the relevant papers. Argentina stated that it would work intersessionally with Parties to resolve any doubt about the application of this disclaimer if the Rules of Procedure allow such an approach. Such consultation with the MoP would be not to modify the text, but rather to clarify the application of the disclaimer.
View Source

Related to BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES

  • Bibliography [ABD16] ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇. A subfield lattice attack on overstretched NTRU assumptions. In: Springer, 2016, pages 153–178. [AD21] ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇. Lattice Attacks on NTRU and LWE: A History of Refinements. In: Compu- tational Cryptography: Algorithmic Aspects of Cryptol- ogy. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series. Cambridge University Press, 2021, pages 15–40. [ADPS16] ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and Pe- ter ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. Post-quantum Key Exchange–A New Hope. In: 2016, pages 327–343. [AEN19] ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇. Random Lattices: Theory And Practice. Available at ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇/bin/random_lattice. pdf. 2019. [AFG13] ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. On the efficacy of solving LWE by reduction to unique-SVP. In: Springer, 2013, pages 293–310. [AGPS20] ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. Estimating quan- tum speedups for lattice sieves. In: Springer, 2020, pages 583–613. [AGVW17] ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. Revisiting the expected cost of solving uSVP and applications to LWE. In: International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security. Springer. 2017, pages 297–322. [Ajt99] ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇. Generating Hard Instances of the Short Basis Problem. In: ICALP. 1999, pages 1–9. [AKS01] ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. A sieve algorithm for the shortest lattice vector problem. In: STOC. 2001, pages 601–610. [AL22] ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇. Predicting BKZ Z- Shapes on q-ary Lattices. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Re- port 2022/843. 2022. [Alb+15] ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇. On the complex- ity of the BKW algorithm on LWE. In: Designs, Codes and Cryptography 74.2 (2015), pages 325–354. [Alb+19] ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. The general sieve kernel and new records in lattice reduction. In: Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Tech- niques. Springer. 2019, pages 717–746. [ALL19] ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. Decoding Challenge. Available at http : / / ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇. 2019. [AN17] ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇. Random ▇▇▇- ▇▇▇▇▇ revisited: lattice enumeration with discrete prun- ing. In: Eurocrypt. 2017, pages 65–102. [ANS18] ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇. Quantum lattice enumeration and tweaking discrete pruning. In: Asiacrypt. 2018, pages 405–434. [AP11] ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. Generating Shorter Bases for Hard Random Lattices. In: Theory of Computing Sys- tems 48.3 (Apr. 2011). Preliminary version in STACS 2009, pages 535–553. [AR05] ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇. Lattice problems in NP coNP. In: J. ACM 52.5 (2005). Preliminary version in FOCS 2004, pages 749–765. [AUV19] ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. Faster sieving algorithm for approximate SVP with con- stant approximation factors. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2019/1028. 2019. [AWHT16] ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇. Improved progressive BKZ algorithms and their precise cost estimation by sharp simulator. In: Springer, 2016, pages 789–819. [Bab16] ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇. Graph isomorphism in quasipolynomial time. In: Proceedings of the forty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing. 2016, pages 684– 697. [Bab19] ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇. Canonical form for graphs in quasipolyno- mial time: preliminary report. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Com- puting. 2019, pages 1237–1246. [Bab86] ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇. On ▇▇▇▇▇▇’ lattice reduction and the near- est lattice point problem. In: Combinatorica 6.1 (1986). Preliminary version in STACS 1985, pages 1–13.

  • General References All references in this Supplemental Indenture to Articles and Sections, unless otherwise specified, refer to the corresponding Articles and Sections of this Supplemental Indenture; and the term “herein”, “hereof”, “hereunder” and any other word of similar import refers to this Supplemental Indenture.

  • Cross-References Unless otherwise specified, references in this Agreement and in each other Loan Document to any Article or Section are references to such Article or Section of this Agreement or such other Loan Document, as the case may be, and, unless otherwise specified, references in any Article, Section or definition to any clause are references to such clause of such Article, Section or definition.

  • Captions and Cross References The various captions (including the table of contents) in this Agreement are provided solely for convenience of reference and shall not affect the meaning or interpretation of any provision of this Agreement. Unless otherwise indicated, references in this Agreement to any Section, Schedule or Exhibit are to such Section Schedule or Exhibit to this Agreement, as the case may be, and references in any Section, subsection, or clause to any subsection, clause or subclause are to such subsection, clause or subclause of such Section, subsection or clause.

  • Tariff References 3.5.1 References to state tariffs throughout this Agreement shall be to the currently effective tariff for the state or jurisdiction in which the services were provisioned; provided however, where certain AT&T-21STATE services or tariff provisions have been or become deregulated or detariffed, any reference in this Agreement to a detariffed or deregulated service or provision of such tariff shall be deemed to refer to the service description, price list or other agreement pursuant to which AT&T-21STATE provides such services as a result of detariffing or deregulation. 3.5.2 Wherever the term “customer” is used in connection with AT&T-21STATE’s retail tariffs, the term “customer” means the ultimate consumer or the End User of any tariffed service. 3.5.3 No reference to tariffs in this Agreement shall be interpreted or construed as permitting CLEC to purchase Interconnection Services, under such tariff. Except where expressly permitted elsewhere in this Agreement, notwithstanding the availability of Interconnection Services under tariffs in some AT&T-21STATE incumbent ILEC states, CLEC agrees that any purchase of Interconnection Services addressed by this Agreement or required to be offered by AT&T-21STATE under Section 251 of the Act, shall be purchased solely pursuant to the terms, condition and rates set forth in this Agreement. To the extent that complete terms, conditions and/or rates for any Interconnection Service are not contained in this Agreement at the time CLEC seeks to order such services, the Parties shall amend this Agreement to include such terms, conditions and rates prior to CLEC submitting such order. The rates for Interconnection Services inadvertently or improperly ordered prior to an agreement of the Parties on terms, conditions and/or rates is addressed in the Pricing Schedule.