Calibration of Propagation Model Clause Samples

Calibration of Propagation Model. Propagation models are by nature generally predictive devices. In an effort to tailor the TAP model to Virginia’s terrain, and to take into consideration the variations in antenna patterns resulting from tower size, shadowing, etc., we will take various measurements from several VSP sites. Since the existing VSPHQ tower site in Richmond (the Test Bed Site) is reasonably representative of Virginia terrain; we will base our Virginia terrain calibration on that site and incorporate the information into the TAP program. We will take measurements in the vicinity of a maximum of five VSP sites (including the VSPHQ tower site), for the purpose of modeling the antenna pattern(s) at that site. The sites will be selected to demonstrate tower size variation, shadowing from other devices on the tower, etc. We envision that these measurements will occur over the period of two consecutive weeks. For each VSP site measured, we will run propagation analyses using a ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ based analysis tool. We will characterize the area surrounding the site by tile, establishing characteristics such as vegetation, terrain variance, etc. We will then measure the signal levels provided by the analog VHF test bed equipment, and compare these signal levels with those predicted by the model. By identifying variations between the measured and predicted performance (both variations in central tendency and in variances), and correlating these variations with the tile characteristics, we can establish a calibration matrix of dB factors applicable to the test bed site. We can then apply these dB factors to other sites using the same model, for the characteristics identified. We note that transference of these dB factors from the measurement site to another site is not a precise process, and therefore there will be a statistical adjustment that will need to be included in the predictions to accommodate the differences between sites.‌‌‌ The specific process we intend to use in the calibration effort will include the following: • The State and HSMM will agree on appropriate existing VSP sites. • The State will install State supplied VHF conventional system equipment and an antenna system at the site, or we will use the existing equipment. • We will test each site for the parameters required. • The test data will be used to calibrate the computerized propagation analysis model described in Task G1.03.
View Source

Related to Calibration of Propagation Model

  • Interoperability To the extent required by applicable law, Cisco shall provide You with the interface information needed to achieve interoperability between the Software and another independently created program. Cisco will provide this interface information at Your written request after you pay Cisco’s licensing fees (if any). You will keep this information in strict confidence and strictly follow any applicable terms and conditions upon which Cisco makes such information available.

  • Testing Procedures The following test procedure shall apply to all urine tests administered to bargaining unit employees: a. Urine specimens shall be collected at the approved laboratory as stated below in section (e), or at an accredited medical facility when necessary after an accident. b. The employee shall not be observed when the urine specimen is given. c. All specimen containers, vials or bags used to transport the samples shall be sealed with evidence tape and labeled in the presence of the employee. d. The testing shall be done by another approved laboratory. e. The employer shall choose the testing/collection facility to be utilized for toxicology testing on a yearly basis. f. The following standards shall be used to determine what levels of detected substances shall be considered positive. Note: - These are current levels subject to change by Federally Mandated Regulations. Current Federal Regulations shall be controlling in case of change or conflict: DRUG SCREENING TEST CONFIRMATION Amphetamines 500 ng/ml Amphetamine 250 ng/ml GC-MS Marijuana Metabolites 50 ng/▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇-THC 15 ng/ml GC-MS Cocaine Metabolites 150 ng/ml Metabolites 100 ng/ml GC-MS Opiates Morphine 2,000 ng/ml 2,000 ng/ml GC-MS PCP 25 ng/ml PCP 25 ng/ml GC-MS MDMA 500 ng/ml 250 ng/ml Alcohol .08 Breath .04 Breath – Employees with CDL .02 - .039 Breath - Employees with CDL will be removed from service for 24 hrs. g. Tests which are below the levels set forth above shall be determined as negative. If test results are negative, all non-required documentation regarding supervisors' observations and testing will be destroyed. h. At the time the urine specimen is collected two samples will be taken. One sample will be sent to the laboratory to be tested at the employer's expense. If the first sample tests positive then upon written request by the employee within twenty-four

  • System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades Connecting Transmission Owner shall design, procure, construct, install, and own the System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades described in Appendix A hereto. The responsibility of the Developer for costs related to System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Attachment S to the ISO OATT.

  • Testing Procedure Limitations The Asset Representations Reviewer will only be required to perform the testing procedures listed under “Tests” in Schedule A, and will have no obligation to perform additional procedures on any Subject Lease or to provide any information other than a Review Report indicating for each Subject Lease whether there was a Test Pass or a Test Fail for each Test, or whether the Subject Lease was a Test Complete and the related reason. However, the Asset Representations Reviewer may provide additional information about any Subject Lease that it determines in good faith to be material to the Review.

  • Standard Operating Procedures Over approximately the past eight years, the Parties have been supplying select Products to one another for use in the operation of their respective businesses within the United States of America, Canada and Mexico. The Parties developed and been following certain standard operating procedures in connecting with, among other topics, forecasting, production planning, ordering, delivering and resolving claims on the Products supplied to one another (the “Current SOPs”). The Parties will be updating their respective business systems over the next six months, and the updates to these business systems will require the Parties to modify the Current SOPs. Once the Parties have completed the updates to the business systems and agreed on the necessary modifications to the Current SOPs, the Parties will sign a written amendment to this Agreement appending the updated standard operating procedures (the “Updated SOPs”). Until the Parties have signed a written amendment appending the Updated SOPs, the parties will continue to follow the Current SOPs. The Parties will comply with the applicable SOPs in connection with the purchase and sale of products identified in a Purchase Schedule. The Parties may add terms and conditions to, and amend the terms and conditions of, the SOP in a Purchase Schedule, but any additional and amended terms and conditions in a Purchase Schedule supplementing and modifying the SOP will only apply the specific products identified in that Purchase Schedule for its duration.