Circus Processes Clause Samples

Circus Processes. ‌ A mechanised version of the Timer process (Fig. 2 on page 12) is provided in Fig. 10. Its state is given by the HOL type time state and introduced by the following alphabet declaration. The alphabet command is part of Isabelle/UTP and an extension of Isabelle’s record command for introducing record types. An additional behaviour of alphabetis to define lenses for the state components, so that they can be ref- erenced within Isabelle/UTP predicates and relations; details of this are tech- nical and can be found in INTO-CPS Deliverable D2.3b, as well as [15]. Two state components are introduced: currentTime and stepSize. An added feature of the mechanised model is that we represent time abstractly by virtue of an arbitrary type ’τ that fulfils certain type-class membership constraints. The constructs TIME( ) and NZTIME( ) above impose those constraints on ’τ . They guarantee, for instance, that there exists a linear order on the elements of the time domain. They also require the existence of various arithmetic operators like +, , , and so on, with common algebraic properties. Natural, rational and real numbers are valid time domains, for instance. We observe that the Isabelle encoding of the Timer process is a nearly di- rect image of the respective Circus process. There are only a few technical artefacts that we have to remember. Firstly, when referring state components in Circus operators, it is usually nec- ▇▇▇▇▇▇ to decorate them, depending whether the underlying term is a plain predicate or relation. For instance, the occurrence of currentTime within output synchronisations requires an & prefix since the expression is over unprimed variables only. The same applies to the right-hand side of an as- signment. Secondly, where HOL values and terms are referenced, we require the double-angular brackets « ». This emphasises the difference between HOL terms and UTP terms, as the brackets here act as a coercion from the former to the latter. As can be seen, events are prefixed by ‘tm:’, which, as explained in the previous section, is necessary to facilitate later extension of the action event type when additional channels have to be declared. Circus constructs are Figure 11: Encoded InstantiationMode action of the Interaction process. subscripted to delineate to what UTP theory they belong. For instance, equality t1 =u t2 is subscripted with a ‘u’ since this operator is valid in all theories. Fixed-point and assignment, on the other hand, are subscripted with ...
Circus Processes. 53 5.5 Analysis and Proofs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 5.6 Final Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 1 Introduction‌ This report constitutes the final deliverable on FMI modelling foundations. It extends the earlier deliverables D2.1d and D2.2d on this topic by describing a comprehensive model of FMI in the Circus process algebra, and a mecha- nisation of the model in the theorem prover Isabelle/UTP. The mechanised model is instantiated using a case study from railways (see INTO-CPS Deliv- erable D1.2b), and we also discuss reasoning and proof support, in particular, in relation to the verification strategy in INTO-CPS Deliverable D2.3a.
Circus Processes. 34 4.4 Reasoning Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 4.5 Final Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Circus Processes. The process model lifts the relational FMU programs into reactive ones that can interact with a master algorithm and the environment. In the following, we discuss the reactive models of the FMU processes, master algo- rithm, and the composite FMI model that integrates all of them. The com- plete mechanised model can be found in the report ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/ isabelle-utp/utp-main/blob/master/fmi/railways_model.pdf.

Related to Circus Processes

  • TECHNOLOGY/KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER ACTIVITIES The goal of this task is to develop a plan to make the knowledge gained, experimental results, and lessons learned available to the public and key decision makers. • Prepare an Initial Fact Sheet at start of the project that describes the project. Use the format provided by the CAM. • Prepare a Final Project Fact Sheet at the project’s conclusion that discusses results. Use the format provided by the CAM. • Prepare a Technology/Knowledge Transfer Plan that includes: o An explanation of how the knowledge gained from the project will be made available to the public, including the targeted market sector and potential outreach to end users, utilities, regulatory agencies, and others. o A description of the intended use(s) for and users of the project results. o Published documents, including date, title, and periodical name. o Copies of documents, fact sheets, journal articles, press releases, and other documents prepared for public dissemination. These documents must include the Legal Notice required in the terms and conditions. Indicate where and when the documents were disseminated. o A discussion of policy development. State if project has been or will be cited in government policy publications, or used to inform regulatory bodies. o The number of website downloads or public requests for project results. o Additional areas as determined by the CAM. • Conduct technology transfer activities in accordance with the Technology/Knowledge Transfer Plan. These activities will be reported in the Progress Reports. • When directed by the CAM, develop Presentation Materials for an Energy Commission- sponsored conference/workshop(s) on the project. • When directed by the CAM, participate in annual EPIC symposium(s) sponsored by the California Energy Commission. • Provide at least (6) six High Quality Digital Photographs (minimum resolution of 1300x500 pixels in landscape ratio) of pre and post technology installation at the project sites or related project photographs. • Prepare a Technology/Knowledge Transfer Report on technology transfer activities conducted during the project. • Initial Fact Sheet (draft and final) • Final Project Fact Sheet (draft and final) • Presentation Materials (draft and final) • High Quality Digital Photographs • Technology/Knowledge Transfer Plan (draft and final) • Technology/Knowledge Transfer Report (draft and final)

  • ONLINE PUBLIC AUCTION PROCESS Bidders may browse through the PAH Website and select the properties they wish to bid online.

  • DISCIPLINE PROCEDURES The Employer agrees to provide the employee with written notification of a disciplinary document that is to be made a part of the employee’s personnel file. In instances where the Employer desires to conduct an investigatory interview with an employee, the employee shall be entitled upon request to have an Association representative present at the interview. A copy of all disciplinary actions involving suspension or discharge will also be provided to the Association, unless the employee requests that the matter be kept confidential.

  • Sustainable Development 4.1 The Authority will review the Contractor’s Sustainable Development Policy Statement and Sustainable Development Plan submitted by the Contractor in accordance with the Schedule (Sustainable Development Requirements) and then at least annually thereafter. 4.2 Sustainable Procurement Risk Assessment Methodology (SPRAM) is a tool used by the Authority to identify and mitigate any potential risks to sustainability in contracts. The process requires that each Contract be assessed for its potential social, economic and environmental risks, throughout the various stages of its lifetime. Where risks are identified, appropriate mitigation action is required to reduce or eliminate the risk to sustainability. The Authority may at times require input from the Contractor in order to ensure that this process is given the required levels of consideration.

  • Impasse Procedures Impasse proceedings shall be in accordance with § 6-408 of the Education Article to the Annotated Code of Maryland.