CMOM Sample Clauses

CMOM. [INSERT ENTITY NAME] shall develop and implement a CMOM program as set forth in this section for the entire portion of [INSERT ENTITY NAME]’s WCTS connected to Chattanooga’s WCTS. a) Engineering Standards. All work performed under this section shall be performed using sound engineering practices, which include the relevant provisions of the following: Handbook: Sewer System Infrastructure Analysis and Rehabilitation, EPA/625/6-91/030, 1991; Existing Sewer Evaluation and Rehabilitation, WEF MOP FD-6, 1994; Computer Tools for Sanitary Sewer Capacity Analysis and Planning, EPA/600/R-07/111, October 2007; Design of Wastewater and Stormwater Pumping Stations, WEF MOP FD-4; Chapter 40, Wastewater Pumping Stations, latest edition Recommended Standards for Wastewater Facilities, Great Lakes –Upper Mississippi River Board of State and Provincial Public Health and Environmental Managers (Ten State Standards); and the Tennessee Design Criteria for Sewage Works in accordance with Tenn. R. & Regs., ch. 1200-4-2-.03; Georgia Environmental Protection Division documents: Guidelines for Sewage Collection Systems (Revised Nov. 2010), Certification Process for Wastewater Plans and Specifications Submittals (July 26, 2012), Pump Stations and Force Mains Submittal Common Problems List (May 2006); provided, however, if any of the above-referenced standards are updated, the latest edition shall apply. b) CMOM Self-Assessment. Within six (6) months after the Effective Date of this Agreement, [INSERT ENTITY NAME] shall submit to Chattanooga for review and approval, a CMOM Programs Self-Assessment of [INSERT ENTITY NAME]’s WCTS to evaluate the CMOM programs that [INSERT ENTITY NAME] has in place that are designed to reduce peak flows and reduce and eliminate SSOs from [INSERT ENTITY NAME]’s WCTS. The CMOM Programs Self-Assessment shall be performed in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Guide for Evaluating Capacity, Management, Operation, and Maintenance (CMOM) Programs at Sanitary Sewer Collections Systems, EPA 305-B-05- 002 (ver. Jan. 2005), or as may be updated by EPA. The CMOM Programs Self-Assessment shall be certified by a registered Tennessee/Georgia engineer. Each CMOM Program should contain in specific written detail the following: i) a defined purpose and goal; ii) established performance measures; (iii) procedures for periodic review; and iv) provisions for implementation of the CMOM program by trained personnel. Recommended improvements ...
View SourceView Similar (2)

Related to CMOM

  • Geometric visibility The visibility of the illuminating surface, including its visibility in areas which do not appear to be illuminated in the direction of observation considered, shall be ensured within a divergent space defined by generating lines based on the perimeter of the illuminating surface and forming an angle of not less than 5° with the axis of reference of the headlamp.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. ▇▇▇ shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by ▇▇▇.

  • Performance Monitoring ‌ A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives. B. County shall periodically evaluate Subrecipient’s progress in complying with the terms of this Contract. Subrecipient shall cooperate fully during such monitoring. County shall report the findings of each monitoring to Subrecipient. C. County shall monitor the performance of Subrecipient against the goals, outcomes, milestones and performance standards required herein. Substandard performance, as determined by County, will constitute non-compliance with this Contract for which County may immediately terminate the Contract. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by Subrecipient within the time period specified by County, payment(s) will be denied in accordance with the provisions contained in this Paragraph 47 of this Contract. D. HUD in accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 Subpart O, 570.902, will annually review the performance of County to determine whether County has carried out its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) assisted activities in a timely manner and has significantly disbursed CDBG funds and met the mandated “1.5 ratio” threshold. Subrecipient is responsible to ensure timely drawdown of funds.

  • Uptime bookinglab shall ensure that the Booking Service will be available, excluding Downtime caused by Scheduled Maintenance, Emergency Maintenance or Force Majeure event, 99.5% of the time in any one calendar month (first day to last day) (the “Service Level”). The Service Level will not apply (and therefore no Service Credits will be applicable) to the extent that any Service Level Failure is caused by: (a) a Penetration Test conducted by Customer without the prior written approval of bookinglab; or (b) Customer’s failure to comply with specific instructions provided by bookinglab; or (c) a failure of the Customer to comply with any Customer responsibility or obligation detailed in a Statement of Work, Order Form or the Master Subscription Agreement; or (d) Customer’s failure to adhere to JRNI’s or bookinglab’s best practice guidelines for the use of the API.

  • NETLINK MANAGEMENT PTE LTD. (in its capacity as trustee of NetLink Trust) (Company Registration Number: 201704784C), a company incorporated in Singapore with its registered address at ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ Road, #07-03 Viva Business Park Singapore 469005 (“NLT”) AND