Coherence Sample Clauses
The Coherence clause ensures that all provisions within a contract are interpreted in a manner that maintains consistency and avoids contradictions. In practice, this means that if there are ambiguities or apparent conflicts between different sections of the agreement, the contract should be read as a whole to harmonize those provisions rather than treating them as isolated or conflicting. This clause is essential for preventing disputes over interpretation and ensuring that the contract functions as a unified, logical document.
Coherence. This is the first year of reporting this indicator. Similar data are published annually in NBCSP monitoring reports prepared by the AIHW. The most recent of these reports is National bowel cancer screening program monitoring report 2009.
Coherence. The information presented for this indicator is calculated using the same
Coherence. The DoHA aged care data used to construct the numerator of this benchmark are consistent and comparable over time. For measure f i, there are issues with the consistency of the numerator and denominator, as the numerator and denominator are drawn from differently defined populations and different data sources. These issues reduce the consistency of the performance indicators and lead to quality issues.
Coherence. The data items used for the numerator in this indicator are consistent and
Coherence. Create coherence and leverage opportunities to reinforce it. Without explicit linkage to other priorities and on-going work, the new educator evaluation regulations will be both perceived and undertaken as an "add on" that is disconnected from daily practice and big picture goals for the school and district, limiting opportunities for feedback and growth. Linking the data analysis, self-assessment, goal setting, and evidence collection activities required for educator evaluation to key activities already underway in the school is one way to build this coherence. Overview
Coherence. How well does the intervention fit? The compatibility of the intervention with other interventions in a country, sector, or institution. The extent to which other interventions (particularly policies) support or undermine the intervention, and vice versa. Includes internal coherence and external coherence. This includes complementarity, harmonization, and coordination with others, as well as the extent to which the intervention adds value while avoiding duplication of effort. Specific questions to be answered:
i. To what extent is the design and implementation of the Action programme coherent with the policy priorities of the Government of Zimbabwe, especially with regard to building climate resilience?
ii. To what extent is the design and implementation of the Action coherent with the policy priorities of the European Delegation?
iii. To what extent is coherence sought and achieved with other projects and programmes in the targeted areas from Government, national and local stakeholders?
Coherence. The coherence of the variables is checked with Regulation (EC) No 543/2009, and when relevant, with the Farm Structure Survey data (ex-post).
Coherence. The concepts used for the statistics on land prices and rents should be coherent with those of the Economic Accounts for Agriculture. The definitions of the land categories should be as comparable as possible with the definition used for weighting and aggregating the results.
Coherence. Some of these data are published annually in Program monitoring reports prepared by the AIHW. These reports include participation by State and Territory and participation by remoteness and socioeconomic status categories nationally. Data for 2009–2010 will be published in 2012.
Coherence. Coherence is often defined as the equivalent of hanging together, making sense as a whole, cohesion, consonance, speaking with one voice, or being tightly knit (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 1989: 159 in Bertea, 2005: 372). To achieve coherence, there must be reasonable interconnection between mutually reinforcing elements, in order to form supportive rationality (Bertea, 2005: 372). Each of these elements supports or justifies each other, so that they integrate and produce harmony (▇▇▇▇▇, 1993: 640-641). The degree of coherence therefore depends on weighing all the elements and balancing them against each other (▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 1990: 132). The term ‘coherence’ is common in discussions about legal reasoning and legal justification, where coherence is needed to justify legal propositions or judicial decisions (Raz, 1992). A coherent decision means that each argu- ment put forward supports the others, and is in accordance with the basic principles of a legal system (Bertea, 2005: 372). A decision can be justified if it is supported by arguments that are rationally coherent, i.e. the decision does not contain any illogical arguments, in terms of its structure (▇▇▇▇, 2004: 87). The decision can also be justified if it is coherent in terms of exist- ing cases and laws (Levenbook, 1984, 355; ▇▇▇▇▇, 2008: 149). ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ is not only used to justify arguments or decisions. It is essen- tial that any legal system (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2016: 363) has a unity of principles, or a set of legal norms that share the same values or principles (MacCormick, 1984). For Weinrib, every legal doctrine, institution, or action (and its justification) forms an integrated unit, every sub-part (or aspect) of which reflects the whole (▇▇▇▇▇, 1993: 640). In a broader understanding of coherence, law is not only a coherent collection of norms; it must also be coherent with social reality, because it law a social phenomenon (▇▇▇▇, 2004: 90). Unity in the legal system, or being free from contradiction, makes the system clear (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2016: 363). What is coherent can be understood, it makes sense and is well expressed (Raz, 1992: 276 in ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2013: 18). Legal subjects will better understand the law, if the rules in their legal system do not contradict each other, making it more likely that they will understand how the rules apply to them. Therefore, coherence supports both legal certainty and the rule of law (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2016: 363; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2013: 18). In the context of environmental law i...