Conclusion of the Evaluation Sample Clauses

The 'Conclusion of the Evaluation' clause defines the formal end point of an assessment or review process within an agreement. It typically outlines the criteria or events that signal the completion of the evaluation, such as the delivery of a final report or the achievement of specific milestones. This clause ensures that all parties are clear on when the evaluation is considered finished, thereby preventing disputes over ongoing obligations and facilitating the transition to subsequent phases or actions.
Conclusion of the Evaluation. A copy of all final signed evaluation documents shall be given to the unit member, and a copy shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file, excluding any student evaluations, by no later than the last day of the academic semester in which the evaluation took place. The unit member and the administrative evaluator may extend this deadline by mutual consent. All documents placed into the unit member’s personnel file must follow the policies and procedures of this article and of Article 3 of this agreement.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Conclusion of the Evaluation. A copy of all the final, signed evaluation documents shall be given to the unit member, and a copy shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file, excluding any student evaluations or references thereto, by no later than the last day of the academic semester in which the evaluation took place. The unit member and the administrative evaluator may extend this deadline by mutual consent. In the event the unit member being evaluated receives what s/he considers to be a negative evaluation, the evaluation team and the unit member shall discuss the matter at the post-evaluation conference. The administrative evaluator shall specify on the evaluation form the reasons for the alleged deficiencies. The administrative evaluator and the unit member shall meet within fifteen (15) workdays of the post-evaluation conference to develop a written, detailed plan for remediation of the deficiencies upon which the negative evaluation was based. All documents placed into the unit member’s personnel file must follow the policies and procedures of this article and of Article 3 of this agreement.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Conclusion of the Evaluation. 1. The establishment of the final ranking of Tenders in decreasing order of their final mark is calculated as follows: L = Τ * 0.60 + C * 0.40 where: Τ = the Technical Offer evaluation mark, and C = the relative cost of the Financial Offer. 2. The Tender with the highest mark L shall be considered to be the most advantageous Tender based on best price-quality ratio. 3. In cases where the marks of two or more Tenders are the same, these Tenders are ranked in decreasing order of their Technical Offer mark.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Conclusion of the Evaluation. A copy of all final signed evaluation documents shall be given to the unit member, and a copy shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file, excluding any student evaluations, within one week of the final evaluation conference. The unit member and the administrative evaluator may extend this deadline by mutual consent. In the event the unit member evaluated receives what they consider to be a negative evaluation; the administrative evaluator and the unit member shall discuss the matter at the final evaluation conference. The administrative evaluator shall document on the evaluation form the specific reasons for any rating of needs improvement or unsatisfactory. A unit member may submit to the appropriate Vice-President a written response to their evaluation. The written response shall be attached to the evaluation and included in their personnel file. The unit member may, but is not required to, submit the written response to one or both of the evaluators or the area ▇▇▇▇. The administrative evaluator and the unit member shall meet within the first four weeks of the following semester to develop a written, detailed plan for remediation of the deficiencies upon which the negative evaluation was based (form Q). All completed and signed evaluations and written responses will be forwarded to Human Resources for tracking, scheduling, and filing. All documents placed into the unit member’s personnel file must follow the policies and procedures of this article and of Article 3 of this agreement.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Conclusion of the Evaluation of all final signed evaluation documents shall be given to the unit member, and a copy shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file, excluding any student evaluations, by no later than the last day of the academic semester in which the evaluation took place. The unit member and the administrative evaluator may extend this deadline by mutual consent. In the event the unit member being evaluated receives what s/he considers to be a negative evaluation, the evaluation team and the unit member shall discuss the matter at the post-observation conference. The administrative evaluator shall specify on the evaluation form the reasons for the alleged deficiencies. The administrative evaluator and the unit member shall meet within fifteen (15) workdays of the post-observation conference to develop a written, detailed plan for remediation of the deficiencies upon which the negative evaluation was based. All documents placed into the unit member’s personnel file must follow the policies and procedures of this article and of Article 3 of this agreement.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Conclusion of the Evaluation of all final signed evaluation documents shall be given to the unit member, and a copy shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file, excluding any student evaluations, within one week of the final evaluation conference. The unit member and the administrative evaluator may extend this deadline by mutual consent. In the event the unit member being evaluated receives what s/he considers to be a negative evaluation; the administrative evaluator and the unit member shall discuss the matter at the final evaluation conference. The administrative evaluator shall document on the evaluation form the specific reasons for any rating of needs improvement or unsatisfactory. A unit member may submit to the appropriate Vice-President a written response to his/her evaluation. The written response shall be attached to the evaluation and included in his/her personnel file. The unit member may, but is not required to, submit the written response to one or both of the evaluators or the area ▇▇▇▇. The administrative evaluator and the unit member shall meet within the first four weeks of the following semester to develop a written, detailed plan for remediation of the deficiencies upon which the negative evaluation was based (form Q). All documents placed into the unit member’s personnel file must follow the policies and procedures of this article and of Article 3 of this agreement.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Conclusion of the Evaluation. A copy of all final signed evaluation documents shall be given to the unit member, and a copy shall be placed in the unit member's personnel file, excluding any student evaluations, within one week of the final evaluation conference by no later than the last day of the academic semester in which the evaluation took place. The unit member and the administrative evaluator may extend this deadline by mutual consent. In the event the unit member being evaluated receives what s/he considers to be a negative evaluation; the administrative evaluator evaluation team and the unit member shall discuss the matter at the final evaluation post-observation conference. The administrative evaluator shall document specify on the evaluation form the specific reasons for any rating of needs improvement or unsatisfactory the alleged deficiencies. A unit member may submit to the appropriate Vice-President a written response to his/her evaluation. The written response shall be attached to the evaluation and included in his/her personnel file. The unit member may, but is not required to, submit the written response to one or both of the evaluators or the area ▇▇▇▇. The administrative evaluator and the unit member shall meet within the first four weeks of the following semester fifteen (15) workdays of the post-observation conference to develop a written, detailed plan for remediation of the deficiencies upon which the negative evaluation was based (form Q). All documents placed into the unit member’s personnel file must follow the policies and procedures of this article and of Article 3 of this agreement.
View Source

Related to Conclusion of the Evaluation

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.

  • Conclusion of the Agreement 1. All offers made by the Freight Forwarder are non-binding. 2. Agreements, as well as amendments of and additions to these agreements, shall only become effective if and insofar as the Freight Forwarder has confirmed these in writing or the Freight Forwarder has started to perform the Services.

  • Evaluation of Tenders 33.1 The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification criteria. No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. By applying the criteria and methodologies, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. This is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be: a) substantially responsive to the tender documents; and b) the lowest evaluated price. 33.2 Price evaluation will be done for Items or Lots (contracts), as specified in the TDS; and the Tender Price as quoted in accordance with ITT 14. To evaluate a Tender, the Procuring Entity shall consider the following: a) price adjustment due to unconditional discounts offered in accordance with ITT 13.4; b) converting the amount resulting from applying (a) and (b) above, if relevant, to a single currency in accordance with ITT 31; c) price adjustment due to quantifiable nonmaterial non-conformities in accordance with ITT 29.3; and d) any additional evaluation factors specified in the TDS and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. 33.3 The estimated effect of the price adjustment provisions of the Conditions of Contract, applied over the period of execution of the Contract, shall not be considered in Tender evaluation. 33.4 Where the tender involves multiple lots or contracts, the tenderer will be allowed to tender for one or more lots (contracts). Each lot or contract will be evaluated in accordance with ITT 33.