Consistency of Recommendations Sample Clauses

The Consistency of Recommendations clause ensures that any advice, guidance, or recommendations provided under the agreement remain uniform and do not contradict each other throughout the term of the contract. In practice, this means that if multiple recommendations are issued—whether in reports, communications, or deliverables—they must align and not create confusion or conflicting instructions for the recipient. This clause is essential for maintaining clarity and reliability in the advice given, preventing misunderstandings and ensuring that the parties can confidently act on the recommendations provided.
Consistency of Recommendations. It is the responsibility of the CAPT to ensure that its recommendations on renewal, promotion, and tenure are made with consistency of reasons among Employees and with consistency of reasons from year to year. 8.03.1 The Parties recognize the standards contained in Appendix E.
View SourceView Similar (9)
Consistency of Recommendations. It is the responsibility of the CAPT to ensure that its recommendations on renewal, promotion, and tenure are made with consistency of reasons among Employees and with consistency of reasons from year to year, allowance being made for the University to improve its standards in any year upon adequate previous notice to the faculty. 8.03.1 The definition of new standards shall be the responsibility of the Employer and shall not be the responsibility of the Departmental committee or the CAPT. In the process of arriving at new standards the University shall consult the faculty. 8.03.2 The Parties recognize the standards promulgated by the University on June 29, 1993 and contained in Appendix C.
View Source

Related to Consistency of Recommendations

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Recognition of the U.S. Special Resolution Regimes (a) In the event that any Underwriter that is a Covered Entity becomes subject to a proceeding under a U.S. Special Resolution Regime, the transfer from such Underwriter of this Agreement, and any interest and obligation in or under this Agreement, will be effective to the same extent as the transfer would be effective under the U.S. Special Resolution Regime if this Agreement, and any such interest and obligation, were governed by the laws of the United States or a state of the United States. (b) In the event that any Underwriter that is a Covered Entity or a BHC Act Affiliate of such Underwriter becomes subject to a proceeding under a U.S. Special Resolution Regime, Default Rights under this Agreement that may be exercised against such Underwriter are permitted to be exercised to no greater extent than such Default Rights could be exercised under the U.S. Special Resolution Regime if this Agreement were governed by the laws of the United States or a state of the United States.

  • Incorporation of Prompt Payment Policy Statement into Contracts The provisions of this Exhibit shall apply to all Payments as they become due and owing pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, notwithstanding that NYSERDA may subsequently amend its Prompt Payment Policy by further rulemaking.

  • Publication of Procurement Contract 48.1 Within fourteen days after signing the contract, the Procuring Entity shall publish and publicize the awarded contract at its notice boards, entity website; and on the Website of the Authority in manner and format prescribed by the Authority. At the minimum, the notice shall contain the following information: a) name and address of the Procuring Entity; b) name and reference number of the contract being awarded, a summary of its scope and the selection method used; c) the name of the successful Tenderer, the final total contract price, the contract duration. d) dates of signature, commencement and completion of contract; e) names of all Tenderers that submitted Tenders, and their Tender prices as read out at Tender opening;

  • Absence of Regulatory Actions Since January 1, 2014, neither Purchaser nor any of its Subsidiaries has been a party to any cease and desist order, written agreement or memorandum of understanding with, or any commitment letter or similar undertaking to, or has been subject to any action, proceeding, order or directive by any Governmental Entity, or has adopted any board resolutions relating to such matters as are material to the business of Purchaser or its Subsidiaries at the request of any Governmental Entity, or has been advised by any Governmental Entity that it is contemplating issuing or requesting (or is considering the appropriateness of issuing or requesting) any such action, proceeding, order, directive, written agreement, memorandum of understanding, commitment letter, board resolutions or similar undertaking. To the Knowledge of Purchaser, there are no material unresolved violations, criticisms or exceptions by any Governmental Entity with respect to any report or statement relating to any examinations of Purchaser or its Subsidiaries.