Contract Readiness Review Requirement Clause Samples

Contract Readiness Review Requirement. CMS and the Department or their designee, will conduct a Readiness Review of each Contractor, which must be completed successfully, as determined by CMS and the Department, prior to the Contract Operational Start Date.
View SourceView Similar (6)
Contract Readiness Review Requirement. CMS and NYSDOH or their designee, will conduct a Readiness Review of each FIDA Plan, which must be completed successfully, as determined by CMS and NYSDOH, prior to the Contract Operational Start Date.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Contract Readiness Review Requirement. 2.2.1.1. CMS and the State or their designee, will conduct a Readiness Review of each FIDA-IDD Plan, which must be completed successfully prior to the Contract Operational Start Date. 2.2.1.2. CMS and State Readiness Review Responsibilities: 2.2.1.2.1. CMS and the State will conduct a Readiness Review of each FIDA-IDD Plan that will include, at a minimum, one on-site review. This review shall be conducted prior to marketing to and Enrollment of Eligible Individuals into the FIDA-IDD Plan. CMS and the State or their designee will conduct the Readiness Review to verify the FIDA-IDD Plan’s assurances that the FIDA-IDD Plan is ready and able to meet its obligations under the Contract. 2.2.1.2.1.1. The scope of the Readiness Review will include, but is not limited to, a review of the following elements: 2.2.1.2.1.1.1. Participating Provider composition and access, in accordance with Section 2.7; 2.2.1.2.1.1.2. Staffing, including key management positions and functions directly impacting on Participants (e.g., adequacy of Care Manager and Participant Services staffing), in accordance with Sections 2.2.3, 2.5, and 2.10; 2.2.1.2.1.1.3. Capabilities of First Tier, Downstream, and Related Entities, in accordance with Section 2.7.2.3 and Appendix C; 2.2.1.2.1.1.4. Content of Provider Agreements, including any Physician Incentive Plans, in accordance with Section 5.1.7; 2.2.1.2.1.1.5. Care Management capabilities, in accordance with Section 2.5; 2.2.1.2.1.1.6. Participant services capabilities (materials, processes and infrastructure, e.g., call center capabilities), in accordance with Section 2.11; 2.2.1.2.1.1.7. Comprehensiveness of quality management / quality improvement and Utilization Management strategies, in accordance with Section 2.14; 2.2.1.2.1.1.8. Internal Grievance and Appeal policies and procedures, in accordance with Sections 2.12 and 2.13; 2.2.1.2.1.1.9. Fraud and Abuse and program integrity, in accordance with Sections 2.1.5;
View Source

Related to Contract Readiness Review Requirement

  • Contract Review Agent shall have reviewed all material contracts of Borrowers including, without limitation, leases, union contracts, labor contracts, vendor supply contracts, license agreements and distributorship agreements and such contracts and agreements shall be satisfactory in all respects to Agent;

  • Subcontract Requirements As required by Section 6.22(e)(5) of the Administrative Code, Contractor shall insert in every subcontract or other arrangement, which it may make for the performance of Covered Services under this Agreement, a provision that said subcontractor shall pay to all persons performing labor in connection with Covered Services under said subcontract or other arrangement not less than the highest general prevailing rate of wages as fixed and determined by the Board of Supervisors for such labor or services.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS a. NSF will exercise its responsibility for oversight and monitoring of procurements, contracts or other contractual arrangements for the purchase of materials and supplies, equipment or general support services under the award. The procedures set forth below shall be followed to ensure that performance, materials and services are obtained in an effective manner and in compliance with the provisions of applicable Federal statutes and executive orders. The awardee shall obtain prior written approval from the cognizant NSF Grants and Agreements Officer prior to entering into a contract if the amount exceeds $250,000 or other amount specifically identified in the agreement. Contracts clearly identified in the NSF award budget are considered approved at the time of award unless withheld by the Grants and Agreements Officer. Contracts must be clearly identified in the NSF award budget (on Line G6. Other) or by receiving written prior approval from the cognizant NSF Grants and Agreements Officer after an award is issued. The threshold noted above also applies to cumulative increases in the value of the contractual arrangement after initial NSF approval. The awardee shall not artificially segregate its procurements to lesser dollar amounts for the purpose of circumventing this requirement. A request to enter into a contract shall include, at a minimum: 1. Proposed contractual arrangement document; 2. A description of the supplies or services required; 3. Identification of the type of contract to be issued; 4. The proposed price and the recipient's cost or price analysis; 5. Identification of the proposed vendor, an explanation of why and how the proposed vendor was selected, and the degree of competition obtained; and 6. If the contract was awarded without competition, the memorandum shall include a detailed justification.

  • Review Report Within 5 Business Days after the end of the applicable Asset Representations Review period under Section 3.03(b), the Asset Representations Reviewer will deliver to the Issuer, the Administrator, the Servicer, the Depositor and the Indenture Trustee a report indicating for each Review Receivable whether there was a Test Pass, Test Fail or Test Complete for each related Test (a “Review Report”). For each Test Fail or Test Complete, the Review Report will indicate the related reason, including (for example) whether the Review Receivable was a Test Fail as a result of missing or incomplete Review Materials. The Review Report will contain a summary of the Asset Representations Review results to be included in the Issuer’s Form 10-D report for the Collection Period in which the Review Report is received. The Asset Representations Reviewer will ensure that the Review Report does not contain any PII. On reasonable request of the Servicer, the Asset Representations Reviewer will provide additional details on the Test results.