Cost Apportionment Sample Clauses
The Cost Apportionment clause defines how costs associated with a project or agreement are divided among the involved parties. Typically, it outlines the specific expenses to be shared, the method of calculation or allocation (such as proportional to usage or fixed percentages), and the timing of payments. This clause ensures that each party understands their financial responsibilities, thereby preventing disputes over cost distribution and promoting fairness in managing shared expenses.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Cost Apportionment. The Parties shall bear, in equal proportions, the fees and expenses of the Arbitrator or the alternate Arbitrator, including the rental of any premises used for the hearing. This shall apply in all cases except where, as provided in Section the Arbitrator is called upon to reconsider his decision. In such latter instances, the fees and expenses connected with his reconsideration of the decision, including the rental of any premises used, shall be borne in full by the Party which requested such reconsideration.
Cost Apportionment. Not withstanding anything to the contrary herein contained, the Seller will pay one-half (1/2) up to a total of $2,500.00 of the cost to Buyer of the title policy, Survey and environmental assessments.
Cost Apportionment. The parties shall bear in equal proportions the fees and expenses of the Arbitrator including the rental of any premises used for the hearing.
Cost Apportionment. Costs are shared based on the suppression effort expended to protect each agency’s DPA, including the threat to another agency’s DPA. This is a more complex system for identifying agency cost share and will require specific knowledge and skills to facilitate. When assigned, Incident Management Teams will be expected to support the cost share agreement process, including participating in decision making, oversight and providing incident information and documents to support the agreement. Cost share settlement meetings will be conducted in accordance with the “Operating Plan for Cooperative Incident Billings Procedures.” Separate cost share agreements will be developed for incident support and coordination operations. Redding and Riverside OCCs require special consideration. Absent a separate negotiated cost share agreement by the State and Federal OCC Coordinators, the costs involved with the Operation Coordination Centers at Redding and Riverside will be the responsibility of the ordering agency. Typically, cost share agreements for incident support and coordination operations will include the costs generated by management groups and resources not ordered for a specific fire incident. The responsibility for the development of such an agreement will reside with the managers of the support or coordination operation that has been mobilized. Actual costs should be accounted for separately by using an appropriate order number for each agency and support facility and not intermingled with specific fire incident costs. Cost shares should be developed for each unique support operation. As the methodology may vary with each location and situation, it will be documented in the resulting cost share agreement. Guidelines on developing an Incident Support and Coordination Operations Cost Share are described in the “Cost Share Agreement Guideline.” The cost apportionment process is a more complex system for identifying agency cost‐shares and relieves the incident commanders, agency representatives, and line officers of much of the burden of estimating solely from observing how resources are used. This is of assistance in situations where there is a great deal of mobility of resources across protection boundaries. Although more complex and time consuming, the cost apportionment process seeks to achieve cost sharing through an equitable process that takes into consideration the effort that was expended to meet an incident objective. The process develops agency percentages...
Cost Apportionment. The parties hereby agree that all costs outlined in D1.2 to D1.5 herein shall be shared by all the Regional District Partners, pro rata, in proportions equivalent to the percentage that each Regional District Partner’s respective converted assessed value of improvements for hospital purposes using the annual completed assessment roll, bears to the total converted assessed value of improvements of all Regional District Partners (the “Apportionment”). These proportions shall be determined on an annual basis, on or before March 1st in each year of this Agreement and shall apply to the current calendar year.
Cost Apportionment. Each Member Agency’s share of costs incurred under the VC shall be calculated as follows: (Member CAD Incident Count / All Member CAD Incident Count) * 50% + (Member Aid Received via CAD / All Member Aid Received via CAD) * 50%
Cost Apportionment. The cost of the Works is to be shared equally between the HCC and WRC.
Cost Apportionment. 3.1. The Partners agree that costs will be apportioned in line with the methodology set out in this section
Cost Apportionment. Costs are shared based on the suppression effort expended to protect each agency’s DPA, including the threat to another agency’s DPA. This is a more complex system for identifying agency cost share and will require specific knowledge and skills to facilitate. It is important for the ICs/AA/ARs to understand their involvement in the cost apportionment process and the complexity of implementing this methodology. The Incident Finance Section Chief (FSC) and Cost Share Specialist are key advisors to the IC’s, AA’s and/or AR’s in the cost share agreement process. The FSC and/or Cost Share Specialist are responsible to: Assist in determining the appropriate methodology for the incident. Oversee the cost share agreement process. Coordinate the preparation of the draft cost share agreement; ensuring clauses are consistent with the cooperative fire agreement and agency policies. Create and maintain documentation to support the cost share agreement.
Cost Apportionment. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ shall pay for its attributable share of the costs to provide the Route (the "Fraser Portion") pursuant to the formula set forth in Exhibit B. Any change to the formula set forth in Exhibit B must be first recommended by the TAC and then approved by both Parties. Winter Park shall invoice Fraser for the Fraser Portion on a monthly basis.