Decision Process Sample Clauses

Decision Process. Decisions of the Technical Board shall be approved by a majority of votes of members present or represented, except for roadmap prioritization. Roadmap prioritization is decided according to the process described in article 9.3

Decision Process. Decisions of the General Assembly shall be approved by a majority of votes of Standard Members present or represented, except for roadmap prioritization. Only Standard members get to vote. Roadmap prioritization is decided according to the process described in article 9.3 An Academic Member plays a consultative role. His representative may attend the meetings of the General Assembly as a guest. He can propose ideas, suggestions and give his point of view on discussed topics. By attending the meetings, an Academic Member will be informed of the suggestions, orientations and priorities for the development of ▇▇▇▇▇ and obtain a report of ▇▇▇▇▇ activities. Any decision of the General Assembly may be taken in accordance with the above in meetings via teleconference or other means.

Decision Process. Contemplated decisions about matters mentioned in articles 4 and 5 are not enforced until a majority of the public service unions agree, in as far as they concern: a. Enactment, change or cancellation of a regulation with right and/or obligations of (groups of) employees; b. Allocation of local employment policy funds.

Decision Process. 42.6.1 The Relevant Senior Officer will, as soon as practicable after receiving the report from the Director, HR and any response from the employee, and any review report, make a decision, having regard to all available relevant material and submissions. The employee will be notified in writing of the decision. 42.6.2 The decisions available are: a) take no further action; b) impose disciplinary action as set out in this Agreement.

Decision Process. VII.1.1 A decision to reappoint, award tenure, or to promote shall be made by the Board only on the recommendation of the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, following the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ receipt of a recommendation from COAP, and following COAP’s receipt of a recommendation from the relevant departmental committee. VII.1.2 Probationary reappointment shall not be granted without a positive recommendation from the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, provided that the duties assigned in the probationary reappointment process under this Agreement have been carried out without determinative procedural or substantive error or bias. VII.1.3 Tenure shall not be granted without a positive recommendation from the Tenure Committee and the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ provided that each carries out the duties assigned in the tenure process under this Agreement without determinative procedural or substantive error or bias. VII.1.4 A decision not to reappoint, to deny tenure, or to deny promotion shall be made by the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.

Decision Process. Federal agencies are required to complete an appropriate Decision Support System for all wildland fires that escape initial attack on federally managed lands to determine the appropriate response. This is done via the Wildland Fire Decision Support System (WFDSS). This procedure requires federal agency administrator participation. DFPC requires that a Decision Support System be completed for all fires that receive a FEMA Fire Management Assistance Grant and recommends a Decision Support System are completed for all EFF fires. All agencies involved in extended attack on federal, private and state lands should provide input on the Decision Support System. When a fire is burning, or threatens to burn, on multiple jurisdictions, one Decision Support System should be prepared for the incident that considers all jurisdictions and their interests. When a multijurisdictional fire involves federal ownership, one WFDSS will be prepared for the incident, with federal, state and county input included. The State Agency Administrator will facilitate completion and review of the Decision Support System for EFF fires.

Decision Process for Decisions The persons who are responsible for applying the decision process are the Company representative with the appropriate decision and the Union representative designated by the Union Executive. It is recognized that a given decision may require the involvement of more than these two persons. Subject to and below, decisions to use purchased services will be made on a consensus basis. Both parties must consider all relevant criteria with the mutual goal of selecting the most effective option. The decision makers are responsible for making timely decisions and for the decision itself. Opportunity The parties recognize that work may be done more effectively internally or externally. Opportunities for the application of this Article to new or existing work can be initiated by Management andlor the Union. It is intended that joint discussion should commence as soon as possible and before detailed definition of the need to have new or existing work done by purchased Definition of Need The parties will consider what work must be done and why and include such dimensions as when it must commence and the duration of the work; the quantity of resources required; the quality of the results; the skills required and their availability internally and externally; and safety requirements.

Decision Process. The Board of Supervisors shall determine the department in which the reduction is to be made and the number and classes of positions to be eliminated for the County.

Decision Process. The development of suppression strategies and tactics should consider the probability of success, safety risk mitigations, available resources, values at risk, social and political values, and existing legal statutes. The decisions should be documented per each agencies policy and included in the incident file. A wildland fire decision document will be completed by the Jurisdictional Agency per agency requirements. The wildland fire decision documents the Jurisdictional Agency’s direction for the specific incident. Periodic assessments by the agency administrator of the wildland fire decision will occur. The Wildland Fire Decision Support System (WFDSS) is used by the federal agencies and the State uses the Incident Situation Assessment (ISA). The Jurisdictional Agency provides resource-based input to the incoming team through the Jurisdictional Agency’s line officer signature delegation, development of the wildland fire decision document, and presence of a Jurisdictional Agency resource advisor on the incident. The Delegation of Authority (DOA) will incorporate these planning documents and will clearly communicate the intent of the leader(s). The DOA will be signed by all Agencies based on incident requirement.