Dewatering Monitoring Sample Clauses

The Dewatering Monitoring clause establishes requirements for observing and recording the process of removing groundwater or surface water from a construction site. Typically, this involves specifying the frequency and methods of monitoring water levels, flow rates, and the effectiveness of dewatering equipment, as well as documenting any changes in site conditions. By mandating systematic monitoring, the clause helps ensure that dewatering activities are effective, environmental impacts are minimized, and compliance with regulatory or project standards is maintained.
Dewatering Monitoring. At the outset, the only data available to determine the water quality of the tunnel water consisted of six samples collected in 1988 during the original tunnel boring operations. Although insufficient, the depths and configuration of the tunnels prevented additional samples from being collected, and the available data had to serve as the basis for the design of the water treatment process design. The monitoring program that was developed and implemented addressed these parameters. The dewatering of the tunnels was completed in August 2007 and presently only the water infiltrating into the tunnels is pumped to the water treatment system. The treatment system developed during the initial dewatering activities is illustrated in Figure 1.4; the water passes through a cascade aeration system, a primary settling pond, a ▇▇▇▇ bed drainage channel and the DEVCO settling pond prior to its discharge to Schooner Pond Cove. Samples have been collected twice weekly by CBCL Limited since the start-up of the dewatering process in November 2006; third party monitoring was undertaken at the outset of the program by AMEC Consulting to ensure the establishment of effective protocols and to verify initial results. The sampling locations are shown on Figure 3.3; they are: ⮚ MP-1 – the initial sampling of the water from the tunnel waters prior to its discharge to the serpentine sedimentation pond; ⮚ MP-2 – sampling of the effluent discharged from the serpentine sedimentation pond; ⮚ MP-3 – sampling of the effluent discharged from the drainage channel; and ⮚ MP-4 – sampling of the effluent discharged from the DEVCO settling pond prior to discharge into Schooner Pond Cove. As the Proponent is not permitted to discharge any deleterious substance to waters frequented by fish pursuant to section 36(3) of the Fisheries Act, two 96-hr LC50 acute toxicity tests were performed on the tunnel waters, i.e., at MP-1, and one 96-hr LC50 acute test on the discharge waters at MP-4. The bioassay used for all three toxicity tests were Rainbow Trout fingerlings. The results of this work are provided in Section 4.3.5.5.
View Source

Related to Dewatering Monitoring

  • Dewatering (a) Where the whole of a site is so affected by surface water following a period of rain that all productive work is suspended by agreement of the Parties, then dewatering shall proceed as above with Employees so engaged being paid at penalty rates as is the case for safety rectification work. This work is typically performed by Employees engaged within CW1, CW2 or CW3 classifications. When other Employees are undertaking productive work in an area or areas not so affected then dewatering will only attract single time rates. (b) Where a part of a site is affected by surface water following a period of rain, thus rendering some areas unsafe for productive work, consistent with the Employer’s obligations under the OH&S Act, appropriate Employees shall assist in the tidying up of their own work site or area if it is so affected. Where required, appropriate Employees will be provided with the appropriate PPE. Such work to be paid at single time rates. Productive work will continue in areas not so affected. (c) To avoid any confusion any ‘dewatering’ time which prevents an Employee from being engaged in their normal productive work is not included in any calculation for the purposes of determining whether an Employee is entitled to go home due to wet weather (refer clauses 32.4 and 32.5)

  • Contract Monitoring The criminal background checks required by this rule shall be national in scope, and must be conducted at least once every three (3) years. Contractor shall make the criminal background checks required by Paragraph IV.G.1 available for inspection and copying by DRS personnel upon request of DRS.

  • TOOL STORAGE 1. A company shall provide on all construction jobs in towns and cities, and elsewhere where reasonably necessary and practicable (or if requested buy the employee), a suitable and secure waterproof lock-up solely for the purpose of storing employees’ tools, and on multi-storey and major projects the company shall provide, where possible, a suitable lock-up for employees’ tools within a reasonable distance of the work area of large groups of employees. 2. Where an employee is absent from work because of illness or accident and has advised the company in accordance with Clause 33 – Personal Leave of the award, the company shall ensure that the employee’s tools are securely stored during his/her absence.

  • Infrastructure Vulnerability Scanning Supplier will scan its internal environments (e.g., servers, network devices, etc.) related to Deliverables monthly and external environments related to Deliverables weekly. Supplier will have a defined process to address any findings but will ensure that any high-risk vulnerabilities are addressed within 30 days.

  • Project Monitoring The Developer shall provide regular status reports to the NYISO in accordance with the monitoring requirements set forth in the Development Schedule, the Public Policy Transmission Planning Process Manual and Attachment Y of the OATT.