Educator and evaluator hold the Summative Evaluation Conference Clause Samples

Educator and evaluator hold the Summative Evaluation Conference. In the Summative Evaluation Conference, the evaluator and educator review artifacts prepared by the educator, student growth data, and observation reports as appropriate. This conference enables the educator to point out important aspects of the educator’s work as well as essential areas of growth. The educator will present the educator’s student growth data relative to the educator’s goals in Criteria 3 and 6. This data will be used to evaluate the student growth Component of TPEP using the student growth rubrics. Criterion scores, including instructional and student growth rubrics, will be determined by an analysis of evidence.
Educator and evaluator hold the Summative Evaluation Conference. Prior to June 1, the evaluator and educator hold a final summative evaluation conference to review the outcome of the initial conference, artifacts and/or evidence prepared by the educator, student growth data, and observation reports as appropriate. This summative evaluation conference enables the educator to point out important aspects of his or her work as well as essential areas of growth. The educator will present his/her student growth data relative to his/her goals in Criterion 3 or 6. This data will be used to evaluate the student growth component of TPEP using the student growth rubrics. Criterion scores, including instructional and student growth rubrics, will be determined by an analysis of evidence. The Summative score reported to OSPI is the Summative score earned on the most recent Comprehensive Evaluation Cycle. Should an educator provide evidence of exemplary practice on the chosen focused criterion, a Distinguished score may be awarded by the evaluator for that year. Ratings shall be based upon the preponderance of evidence and its relationship to the state developed rubric. When there is an even number of components within a criterion, a split score, or evidence is unclear, the educator and evaluator may use one or more of the following to determine the criterion score:  Have further discussion about the specific components; or  Provide additional convincing evidence or artifacts, if relevant; or  Conduct additional observations if the criterion can be evaluated by observation. The educator signs the Focused evaluation; copies are filed with the educator, evaluator, and the District’s Human Resources office. The educator’s signature shall indicate that the evaluation has been discussed, but does not necessarily denote agreement with all that is written. Such statements as the educator may deem appropriate may be attached to the evaluation. Evidence and artifacts are not submitted with the report to the MISD Human Resources Department.

Related to Educator and evaluator hold the Summative Evaluation Conference

  • Evaluation Conference The final evaluation conference shall occur not later than the end of week six (6) of the spring semester. The purpose of the evaluation conference is to discuss the results of the visitation and other relevant evaluation information. If the team recommends that the District not employ the professor for the following year, no evaluation activities in year four (4) are necessary.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 Where the Employer is, any time during the Employee’s employment, not satisfied with the Employee’s performance with respect to any matter dealt with in this Agreement, the Employer will give notice to the Employee to attend a meeting; 12.2 The Employee will have the opportunity at the meeting to satisfy the Employer of the measures being taken to ensure that his performance becomes satisfactory and any programme, including any dates, for implementing these measures; 12.3 Where there is a dispute or difference as to the performance of the Employee under this Agreement, the Parties will confer with a view to resolving the dispute or difference; and 12.4 In the case of unacceptable performance, the Employer shall – 12.4.1 Provide systematic remedial or developmental support to assist the Employee to improve his performance; and 12.4.2 After appropriate performance counselling and having provided the necessary guidance and/or support as well as reasonable time for improvement in performance, the Employer may consider steps to terminate the contract of employment of the Employee on grounds of unfitness or incapacity to carry out his or her duties.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is an experienced and knowledgeable investor in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, title, reservoir engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Properties, the value thereof and title thereto.