EMPLOYEE EVALUATION. Sec 25.1 Pursuant to Oregon Revised Statute 342.850, the District shall conduct evaluations of teachers based on job descriptions and performance standards with the adopted evaluation policies. Sec 25.2 Each year a committee representing an equal number of teachers assigned by ▇▇▇▇ and administrators designated by the Superintendent will review the current evaluation process from the Licensed Educators Evaluation and Growth System and suggest modifications if needed. The composition of the committee shall appropriately represent subjects and grade levels. Sec 25.3 Adoption of changes or revisions shall be through acceptance from ▇▇▇▇, the Superintendent, and the school Board. Changes will be implemented when the Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Handbook is revised and approved. This handbook will serve as an addendum to the current contract and shall become effective with the new evaluation cycle. Sec 25.4 Where serious deficiencies are identified through the formal observation process and noted in writing in the evaluation documents, a teacher may be placed on a program of assistance for improvement. A Program of Assistance for Improvement (PAI) will be developed by the evaluator in cooperation with the employee. A Program of Assistance for Improvement shall be in writing, in accordance with ORS 342.815 and shall consist of a minimum of 60 calendar days. Sec 25.5 An employee may request to have an Association representative present during any meetings held with the evaluator or any other administrator regarding the Program of Assistance for Improvement. Sec 25.6 While the components of a Program of Assistance for Improvement may be varied the following principles shall be contained in plans resulting from deficiencies noted in the evaluation documents: a) The plan will identify the performance standards deemed deficient. b) The plan will set forth a description of the expectations related to the deficiency(ies). c) The plan will include a description of assistance and resources to be provided to the employee which may include but are not limited to mentoring, coursework, book studies, coaching, classroom visitations, etc. d) The plan will identify monitoring procedures. e) The plan will establish a completion date. Sec 25.7 Successful programs of assistance for improvement shall not be placed in personnel files since they are for the specific purpose of improving instruction. Programs of assistance for improvement are not intended to be punitive in nature. Once a plan of assistance has been completed, the supervisor will place a note on the employee's final evaluation documenting the successful completion.
Appears in 3 contracts
Sources: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
EMPLOYEE EVALUATION. Sec 25.1 Pursuant The objective of the employee evaluation programs (classified, professional, and licensed) is to Oregon Revised Statute 342.850facilitate decision making regarding an employee's performance and professional development. To this end, the programs serve the purpose of: • Fostering increasing competence and growth of the employee; • Measuring and judging performance; • Clarifying the job description and the expectations of accomplishment; • Enhancing communication.
A. Evaluations of classified staff shall be conducted according to the terms of the document entitled “Lane Education Service District Classified Employee Evaluation Program.”
B. The evaluator for teacher evaluations shall conduct evaluations of teachers based on job descriptions and performance standards with the adopted hold a teaching license. The evaluation policies. Sec 25.2 Each year a committee representing an equal number of teachers assigned by ▇▇▇▇ and administrators designated shall be signed by the Superintendent will review teacher and the current evaluation process from District supervisor who supervises the Licensed Educators Evaluation and Growth System and suggest modifications if neededteacher. The composition A copy of the committee shall appropriately represent subjects and grade levels. Sec 25.3 Adoption of changes or revisions evaluation shall be through acceptance from ▇▇▇▇, the Superintendent, and the school Board. Changes will be implemented when the Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Handbook is revised and approved. This handbook will serve as an addendum provided to the current contract and shall become effective with teacher.
C. Employees may attach a written statement relating to any evaluation placed in their personnel file.
D. If the new evaluation cycle. Sec 25.4 Where serious deficiencies are identified through the formal observation process and noted in writing employee believes that any statements contained in the evaluation documentsare unsubstantiated, they may grieve the matter through the Board’s adopted grievance policy.
E. The results of performance observation shall be in writing with a copy to the
1. The current performance which is unacceptable or needing improvement;
2. The required level of performance;
3. The specific plan for achieving the required level of performance;
4. The resources required to achieve the desired performance;
5. A timeline for completing the plan/program of assistance;
6. What will occur if the required level of performance is not achieved. No plan of assistance/program of assistance for improvement can be implemented without giving due notice of at least twenty-four (24) hours to the employee, prior to the implementation of the plan. A contract teacher may will not be placed on a program of assistance for improvement. A Program of Assistance improvement for Improvement any alleged deficiency stated in ORS 342.865 (PAIsee below) will be developed by without the evaluator in cooperation with the employee. A Program of Assistance for Improvement shall be in writing, in accordance with ORS 342.815 and shall consist completion of a minimum of 60 calendar days. Sec 25.5 An employee may request meeting to have an Association representative present during any meetings held with review the evaluator or any other administrator regarding concern and the Program of Assistance for Improvement. Sec 25.6 While the components of a Program of Assistance for Improvement may be varied the following principles shall be contained in plans resulting from deficiencies noted in the evaluation documents:
a) The plan will identify the performance standards deemed deficient.
b) The plan will set forth a description of the expectations data collected related to the deficiency(ies).
c) The plan alleged deficiency. • Inefficiency • Neglect of duty • Inadequate performance • Failure to comply with such reasonable requirements as the Board may prescribe to show normal improvement and evidence of professional training and growth. At the time of the meeting to review the concern, written notice of the alleged deficiency will be provided. If observational data is used, this will include a description pre-observation and post observation meeting.
F. The District will offer peer assistance whenever practicable and reasonable to aid the employee to better meet the needs of students.
1. The teacher who will receive the peer assistance and resources the Association will have input on the selection of the person(s) or agency that will provide the assistance.
2. Participation in peer assistance is voluntary. Both the teacher offered assistance and the person asked to provide assistance may refuse to participate with no adverse consequences or penalty.
3. Participation in peer assistance will not unreasonably increase the workload of participating teachers. The District will provide release time to be provided used for purposes related to peer assistance if such release time is deemed necessary by the employee which may include but are not limited to mentoring, coursework, book studies, coaching, classroom visitations, etcDistrict.
d) The plan 4. No witness or document relating to or arising from peer assistance will identify monitoring proceduresbe used for any proceeding before the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board, or in a probationary teacher non- renewal hearing. Use of such material or witnesses or documents must be approved by mutual consent for the hearings identified above.
eG. Employee discipline and the charges which resulted in the discipline shall be considered stale after sixty (60) The plan will establish a completion datemonths, so long as no other discipline for the same type of conduct occurs. Sec 25.7 Successful programs of assistance for improvement shall A stale document may not be placed in personnel files since they are used for the specific any purpose of improving instruction. Programs of assistance for improvement are not intended to be punitive in nature. Once a plan of assistance has been completedsupport progressive discipline, the supervisor will place a note on the employee's final evaluation documenting the successful completionnon-extension, or dismissal.
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
EMPLOYEE EVALUATION. Sec 25.1 Pursuant A. There shall be an annual evaluation of each member of the instructional and non-instructional staff. The principal or person directly responsible for the supervision of the individual shall make the evaluation using the appropriate state approved evaluation instrument and /or by utilizing the district’s digital Professional Growth System (PGS). The data collected during an instructional observation will be available for review by the instructional personnel when the information is uploaded to Oregon Revised Statute 342.850, the District PGS by the evaluating administrator. The final evaluation shall conduct evaluations of teachers based on job descriptions and performance standards be discussed with the adopted employee by the person responsible for making the evaluation policiesthrough the PGS. Sec 25.2 Each year a committee representing The filing of employee evaluations shall be carried out in accordance with state statutes. All observations of an equal number employee for purposes of teachers assigned by evaluation shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee.
B. A copy of The Santa ▇▇▇▇ District Teacher Evaluation System, and administrators designated by an orientation to the Superintendent will review the current evaluation process from the Licensed Educators Evaluation and Growth System and suggest modifications if neededwill be given to teachers during pre-planning. The composition of the committee shall appropriately represent subjects and grade levels. Sec 25.3 Adoption of changes or revisions evaluation shall be through acceptance from ▇▇▇▇used for the purpose of improving the quality of instruction. In the school year 2014-15 and thereafter, the Superintendentannual evaluation will also be used to determine performance pay as negotiated each year.
C. The evaluation system and the evaluator shall offer opportunities for noting deficiencies, suggestions for improvement, assistance available for correcting deficiencies, the period of time within which improvements must be made, and the school Board. Changes will probable consequences if improvements are not made.
D. A copy of the final electronically signed evaluation shall be implemented when available for printing from the Teacher Evaluation PGS and Professional Growth Handbook is revised provided to any employee upon request.
E. See SB policy number 6.17* which addresses Fairness and approved. This handbook will serve as an addendum to the current contract and shall become effective with the new evaluation cycle. Sec 25.4 Where serious deficiencies are identified through the formal observation process and noted in writing Impartiality in the Supervision of Employees.
F. Within 15 working-days of the announcement of the final evaluation documentsresults, a teacher may be placed on a program of assistance for improvement. A Program of Assistance for Improvement (PAI) will be developed by the evaluator in cooperation with the employee. A Program of Assistance for Improvement shall be in writing, in accordance with ORS 342.815 and shall consist of a minimum of 60 calendar days. Sec 25.5 An an employee may request a review of their annual evaluation based on possible errors in data collection, possible errors in the students included in performance data, possible procedural errors or errors in final evaluation rating calculation. An Evaluation Review Committee shall be created to have an Association representative present during review such requests and determine if any meetings held with the evaluator or any other administrator regarding the Program corrective action is necessary. The Evaluation Review Committee shall be comprised of Assistance for Improvement. Sec 25.6 While the components of a Program of Assistance for Improvement may be varied the following principles shall be contained in plans resulting from deficiencies noted in the evaluation documentsmembers:
a) The plan will identify the performance standards deemed deficient.
b) The plan will set forth a description of the expectations related to the deficiency(ies).
c) The plan will include a description of assistance and resources to be provided to the employee which may include but are not limited to mentoring, coursework, book studies, coaching, classroom visitations, etc.
d) The plan will identify monitoring procedures.
e) The plan will establish a completion date. Sec 25.7 Successful programs of assistance for improvement shall not be placed in personnel files since they are for the specific purpose of improving instruction. Programs of assistance for improvement are not intended to be punitive in nature. Once a plan of assistance has been completed, the supervisor will place a note on the employee's final evaluation documenting the successful completion.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Collective Bargaining Agreement
EMPLOYEE EVALUATION. Sec 25.1 Pursuant to Oregon Revised Statute 342.850, the District shall conduct evaluations of teachers employees based on job descriptions and performance standards with the adopted evaluation policies. Sec 25.2 Each year a committee representing an equal number of teachers assigned by ▇▇▇▇ and administrators designated by the Superintendent will review the current evaluation process from the Licensed Educators Evaluation and Growth System and suggest modifications if needed. The composition of the committee shall appropriately represent subjects and grade levels. Sec 25.3 Adoption of changes or revisions shall be through acceptance from ▇▇▇▇, the Superintendent, and the school Board. Changes will be implemented when the Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Handbook is revised and approved. This handbook will serve as an addendum to the current contract and shall become effective with the new evaluation cycle. Sec 25.4 Where serious deficiencies are identified through the formal observation process and noted in writing in the evaluation documents, a teacher an employee may be placed on a program of assistance for improvement. A Program of Assistance for Improvement (PAI) will be developed by the evaluator in cooperation with the employee. A Program of Assistance for Improvement shall be in writing, in accordance with ORS 342.815 and shall consist of a minimum of 60 calendar days. Sec 25.5 An employee may request to have an Association representative present during any meetings held with the evaluator or any other administrator regarding the Program of Assistance for Improvement. Sec 25.6 While the components of a Program of Assistance for Improvement may be varied the following principles shall be contained in plans resulting from deficiencies noted in the evaluation documents:
a) The plan will identify the performance standards deemed deficient.
b) The plan will set forth a description of the expectations related to the deficiency(ies).
c) The plan will include a description of assistance and resources to be provided to the employee which may include but are not limited to mentoring, coursework, book studies, coaching, classroom visitations, etc.
d) The plan will identify monitoring procedures.
e) The plan will establish a completion date. Sec 25.7 Successful programs of assistance for improvement shall not be placed in personnel files since they are for the specific purpose of improving instruction. Programs of assistance for improvement are not intended to be punitive in nature. Once a plan of assistance has been completed, the supervisor will place a note on the employee's final evaluation documenting the successful completion.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Collective Bargaining Agreement
EMPLOYEE EVALUATION. Sec 25.1 Pursuant to Oregon Revised Statute 342.850, the District shall conduct evaluations of teachers employees based on job descriptions and performance standards with the adopted evaluation policies. Sec 25.2 Each year a committee representing an equal number of teachers assigned by ▇▇▇▇ and administrators designated by the Superintendent will review the current evaluation process from the Licensed Educators Evaluation and Growth System and suggest modifications if needed. The composition of the committee shall appropriately represent subjects and grade levels. Sec 25.3 Adoption of changes or revisions shall be through acceptance from ▇▇▇▇, the Superintendent, and the school Board. Changes will be implemented when the Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Handbook is revised and approved. This handbook will serve as an addendum to the current contract and shall become effective with the new evaluation cycle. Sec 25.4 Where serious deficiencies are identified through the formal observation process and noted in writing in the evaluation documents, a teacher an employee may be placed on a program of assistance for improvement. A Program of Assistance for Improvement (PAI) will be developed by the evaluator in cooperation with the employee. A Program of Assistance for Improvement shall be in writing, in accordance with ORS 342.815 and shall consist of a minimum of 60 calendar days. Sec 25.5 An employee may request to have an Association representative present during any meetings held with the evaluator or any other administrator regarding the Program of Assistance for Improvement. Sec 25.6 While the components of a Program of Assistance for Improvement may be varied the following principles shall be contained in plans resulting from deficiencies noted in the evaluation documents:
a) The plan will identify the performance standards deemed deficient.
b) The plan will set forth a description of the expectations related to the deficiency(ies).
c) The plan will include a description of assistance and resources to be provided to the employee which may include but are not limited to mentoring, coursework, book studies, coaching, classroom visitations, etc.
d) The plan will identify monitoring procedures.
e) The plan will establish a completion date. Sec 25.7 Successful programs of assistance for improvement shall not be placed in personnel files since they are for the specific purpose of improving instruction. Programs of assistance for improvement are not intended to be punitive in nature. Once a plan of assistance has been completed, the supervisor will place a note on the employee's final evaluation documenting the successful completion.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Collective Bargaining Agreement
EMPLOYEE EVALUATION. Sec 25.1 Pursuant to Oregon Revised Statute 342.850, the District shall conduct evaluations of teachers based on job descriptions and performance standards with the adopted evaluation policies. Sec 25.2 Each year a committee representing an equal number of teachers assigned by ▇▇▇▇ and administrators designated by the Superintendent will review the current evaluation process from the Licensed Educators Evaluation and Growth System and suggest modifications if needed. The composition of the committee shall appropriately represent subjects and grade levels. Sec 25.3 Adoption of changes or revisions shall be through acceptance from ▇▇▇▇, the Superintendent, and the school Board. Changes will be implemented when the Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Handbook is revised and approved. This handbook will serve as an addendum to the current contract and shall become effective with the new evaluation cycle. Sec 25.4 Where serious deficiencies are identified through the formal observation process and noted in writing in the evaluation documents, a teacher may be placed on a program of assistance for improvement. A Program program of Assistance assistance for Improvement (PAI) improvement will be developed by the evaluator in cooperation with the employee. A Program program of Assistance assistance for Improvement improvement shall be in writing, in accordance with ORS 342.815 and shall consist of a minimum of 60 calendar days. Sec 25.5 An employee may request to have an Association representative present during any meetings held with the evaluator or any other administrator regarding the Program of Assistance for Improvement. Sec 25.6 While the components of a Program of Assistance for Improvement may be varied the following principles shall be contained in plans resulting from deficiencies noted in the evaluation documents:
a) The plan will identify the performance standards deemed deficient.
b) The plan will set forth a description of the expectations related to the deficiency(ies).
c) The plan will include a description of assistance and resources to be provided to the employee which may include but are not limited to mentoring, coursework, book studies, coaching, classroom visitations, etc.
d) The plan will identify monitoring procedures.
e) The plan will establish a completion date. Sec 25.7 Successful programs of assistance for improvement shall not be placed in personnel files since they are for the specific purpose of improving instruction. Programs of assistance for improvement are not intended to be punitive in nature. Once a plan of assistance has been completed, the supervisor will place a note on the employee's final evaluation documenting the successful completion.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Collective Bargaining Agreement
EMPLOYEE EVALUATION. Sec 25.1 Pursuant to Oregon Revised Statute 342.850, The District will comply with the District provisions of ORS 342.850 in evaluating licensed staff. Probationary employees shall conduct evaluations of be evaluated annually using multiple observations. Contract teachers based on job shall be evaluated at least every other year.
A. Evaluation procedures shall include at the minimum:
1. Job descriptions and performance standards with standards;
2. Pre-evaluation interviews, which will include the adopted establishment of performance goals;
3. The evaluation policieswill be based upon written criteria which include the performance goals;
4. Sec 25.2 Each year a committee representing an equal number Post-evaluation interviews in which the results of teachers assigned by ▇▇▇▇ and administrators designated by the Superintendent will review the current evaluation process from the Licensed Educators Evaluation and Growth System and suggest modifications are discussed;
5. A written program of assistance for improvement, if needed.
6. The composition of the committee shall appropriately represent subjects and grade levels. Sec 25.3 Adoption of changes or revisions shall be through acceptance from ▇▇▇▇, the Superintendent, and the school Board. Changes will be implemented when the Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Handbook is revised and approved. This handbook will serve Standards as an addendum to the current contract and shall become effective with the new evaluation cycle. Sec 25.4 Where serious deficiencies are identified through the formal observation process and noted in writing defined in the evaluation documents, a teacher may be placed on District Handbook for Professional Growth.
B. If it is determined that a program of assistance for improvementimprovement is to be implemented, it will include the following components:
1. A Program of Assistance for Improvement (PAI) meeting will be developed held with the employee and, if the employee desires, the employee's REA/OBA association representative, to review a draft program of assistance, offer suggestions and input, and clarify the program of assistance.
2. A statement of the employee's deficiencies noted in prior observations or evaluations or brought to the attention of the evaluator through parental or student complaints;
3. A statement of expectations, which should include specific details of how the employee should perform in the areas where deficiencies have been noted;
4. A statement of the assistance that will be provided by the evaluator or other staff members, as well as other resources the employee will have available;
5. Timelines and provisions for monitoring progress in cooperation with correcting the employeedeficiencies;
6. A Program Consequences if the program of Assistance for Improvement assistance is not satisfactorily completed.
C. Procedural aspects of employee evaluation shall be in writingsubject to the grievance procedure. However, in accordance with ORS 342.815 and shall consist of a minimum of 60 calendar days. Sec 25.5 An employee may request to have an Association representative present during any meetings held with the evaluator or any other administrator regarding the Program of Assistance for Improvement. Sec 25.6 While the components of a Program of Assistance for Improvement may be varied the following principles shall be contained in plans resulting from deficiencies noted in the evaluation documents:
a) The plan will identify the performance standards deemed deficient.
b) The plan will set forth a description substance of the expectations related to the deficiency(ies)evaluations is not grievable.
c) The plan will include a description of assistance and resources to be provided to the employee which may include but are not limited to mentoring, coursework, book studies, coaching, classroom visitations, etc.
d) The plan will identify monitoring procedures.
e) The plan will establish a completion date. Sec 25.7 Successful programs of assistance for improvement shall not be placed in personnel files since they are for the specific purpose of improving instruction. Programs of assistance for improvement are not intended to be punitive in nature. Once a plan of assistance has been completed, the supervisor will place a note on the employee's final evaluation documenting the successful completion.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Professional Services