Evaluation of Services Sample Clauses
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 5 times
Evaluation of Services. 13.1. ACC has the right to evaluate any Service under this Contract, so that we can check compliance with organisational and Service quality requirements.
13.2. Such evaluations can consider any and all aspects of this Contract.
13.3. ACC will use any method of evaluation that we determine is appropriate based on the perceived level of risk.
13.4. ACC can perform such evaluations itself or by using an appropriate subcontractor or other government agency.
13.5. ACC will give you at least 10 business days’ notice of our intention to conduct an evaluation. If we believe that delay will unnecessarily prejudice the interests of any person, we may give you notice of our intention to carry out an evaluation within such other time ACC considers appropriate, but on no less than 24 hours’ notice.
13.6. If ACC considers an evaluation is necessary, then subject to the requirements of relevant law, you will allow ACC access to the information necessary for that process. This includes your records and premises and the records and premises of any relevant subcontractor. You, and any relevant subcontractors will provide ACC with every reasonable facility for and assistance in obtaining access to undertake the evaluation. The person conducting the evaluation may (subject to the rights of Clients or other people receiving the Services) attend Services being provided, and talk with Clients and other providers or users of Services.
13.7. We will not charge you and you will not charge us for any initial evaluation process. You will pay for any further evaluations about the same performance issues if you have not improved your Service standards to the level required by ACC within an agreed length of time.
Evaluation of Services. A. PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITY
B. PROGRAM EVALUATION
Evaluation of Services. The planning council may choose to evaluate how well services funded by RWHAP Part A are meeting identified community needs, or it can pay someone else to do such an evaluation. The Part A recipient’s CQM program can provide information on clinical outcomes that informs the planning council about the impact of services. The recipient may include planning council members on its CQM committee. In addition, most planning councils regularly review EMA/TGA performance along the HIV care continuum. The planning council uses evaluation findings in considering ways to improve the system of care, including changing service priorities and allocations and developing directives. To carry out the array of planning tasks described above the planning council meets regularly throughout the year, as a whole and in committees. See Appendix II for a sample calendar describing the approximate timing of various planning council activities by months of the year.
Evaluation of Services. The Parties are dedicated to their respective missions, levels of excellence and commitment to rural healthcare, and recognize the importance of maintaining their existing level of hospital and other health care services to the extent feasible under evolving standards of quality, cost, effectiveness and reimbursement. D-HH GO will support the continued availability of services necessary and appropriate for the communities served by CMC, HH and MCH and, with respect to HH and MCH, as both necessary to maintain CAH status and appropriate for a comparable rural hospital (collectively the “Core Services”), subject to the following evaluation process. The Regional Presidents, in consultation with the Member CEOs and their respective clinical leaders, will evaluate regularly the effectiveness and efficiency of clinical services provided by the Members in addressing the health needs of the communities they serve. The evaluation will include consideration of the following: (i) the synergies created by the Combination and the goals of the Parties stated in Article 1 above; (ii) quality; (iii) cost; (iv) reimbursement; (v) profitability; (vi) outcomes; (vii) access; (viii) provider retention and recruitment needs and challenges; and (ix) community needs. If the evaluation pertains to any clinical services or operations in Region II that are not consistent with Catholic moral teaching, the ERDs or Canon Law and Section 4.2.2(d) remains applicable, then the evaluation of such services or operations and the process under Section 5.3.3(b) below will be the responsibility of the D-HH GO Chief Clinical Officer or Chief Operating Officer. No Core Service will be terminated, however, for the sole reason that the Core Service is not profitable.
Evaluation of Services. 2.1 HCC shall have the right to determine, in its sole discretion, whether the Services rendered by the Contractor under this Contract are satisfactory and meet the standards expected by HCC. In the event that HCC is not satisfied that the Contractor has performed the Services in an acceptable manner and/or that such Services do not meet the standards required by HCC for the Project and/or that the Work Product (as hereinafter defined) does not meet the expectations of HCC, HCC shall have the right to reject such Services or such Work Product, in which case, either of the following shall occur: (a) the Contractor shall re-perform any unsatisfactory or non- conforming Services or redesign or reconstruct such Work Product at no cost to HCC; or (b) HCC shall terminate the Contract and shall not be obligated to pay any Fees (as hereinafter defined) attributable to the unsatisfactory or non-conforming Services or Work Product.
2.2 The Parties agree that the HCC shall have the right to have access to the area where and equipment on which Contractor is performing Services and to any Work Product resulting from the Services to evaluate Contractor's Services under this Contract, to ensure compliance with all Applicable Law (as hereinafter defined), to review documentation, and/or to obtain other pertinent information.
Evaluation of Services. 2.4.1 BSQUARE understands and agrees that it is obligated under this Agreement to provide MICROSOFT with high quality Work Product and Services at all times during the term of this Agreement. In addition, and as further detailed in Section 2.4.3 below, BSQUARE shall be responsible for initiating prompt and detailed communications with the appropriate MICROSOFT project leaders regarding any Errors discovered during the course of development of software code Deliverables. In the event that any such Errors are caused by a failure of BSQUARE to provide a high quality Work Product, then Microsoft shall be entitled (in addition to any other remedies it may have under this Agreement, at law or in equity) to an appropriate credit for Service time associated with such Error.
2.4.2 For documentation or report Deliverables, MICROSOFT shall evaluate each version of such Deliverable. In the event that it requires corrections, MICROSOFT shall specify the corrections needed and BSQUARE shall deliver an amended version of such documentation within five (5) working days.
Evaluation of Services. The planning council may choose to evaluate how well services funded by RWHAP Part A are meeting identified community needs, or it can pay someone else to do such an evaluation. The Part A recipient’s CQM program can provide information on clinical outcomes that informs the planning council about the impact of services. The recipient may include planning council members on its CQM committee. In addition, most planning councils regularly review EMA/TGA performance along the HIV care continuum. The planning council uses evaluation findings in considering ways to improve the system of care, including changing service priorities and allocations and developing directives. To carry out the array of planning tasks described above the planning council meets regularly throughout the year, as a whole and in committees. See Appendix II for a sample calendar describing the approximate timing of various planning council activities by months of the year. 6 Service Standards: Guidance for ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ HIV/AIDS Program Grantees/ Planning Bodies. 2014. Available at ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇
Evaluation of Services. Cygilant may agree to allow Customer to evaluate the Services with respect to a limited number of nodes or IP addresses for a no charge evaluation of the Services for a designated evaluation period. Upon the expiration of such designated evaluation period, the Evaluation Services license shall automatically terminate. Cygilant shall have no obligation or responsibility to store or preserve any Customer Data upon the expiration of such designated evaluation period. Title to the Evaluation Services shall at all times remain with Cygilant.
Evaluation of Services. The manner in which Gibbsboro subcontracts the services of its Learning Disabilities Teacher Consultant shall be evaluated by Berlin at the conclusion of the 2017-2018 school year. This evaluation shall assess the level and quality of the services provided by Gibbsboro and shall include any concerns that either Berlin or Gibbsboro may have in accordance with Berlin and Gibbsboro Board policies, respectively. A copy of the evaluation shall be furnished to Gibbsboro by April 30 of the respective years. These evaluations shall be utilized by both Berlin and Gibbsboro to determine whether this Agreement should be renewed at the conclusion of this Agreement and/or, whether there should be any modifications to the Agreement.
Evaluation of Services. The services provided by the Investigator will be measured by the Investigator’s completing the tasks as described in Exhibit “A”.