Evaluation System Preamble Clause Samples

The Evaluation System Preamble serves as an introductory section that outlines the purpose, scope, and guiding principles of the evaluation system described in the agreement or policy. It typically sets the context for how evaluations will be conducted, clarifies the objectives of the system, and may reference the standards or criteria to be used. By establishing a clear framework at the outset, this clause ensures that all parties understand the intent and foundational rules of the evaluation process, thereby promoting transparency and reducing the risk of misunderstandings.
Evaluation System Preamble. An evaluation system for teachers has the following elements, goals, and objectives: 1. The evaluation procedures set forth herein shall be to improve the educational program by improving the quality of instruction. 2. The evaluation process shall recognize strengths, identify areas needing improvement, and provide support for professional growth. 3. Within the selected instructional framework teachers will be allowed to exercise their professional judgment and will be evaluated on their own practice, skills, and knowledge as related to state law. 4. An evaluation system should be grounded in trust and respect by all parties through the use of objective standards and by minimizing subjectivity. The parties agree that the following evaluation system is to be implemented in a manner consistent with good faith and mutual respect and, as defined in RCW 28A.405.110 (1), “An evaluation system must be meaningful, helpful, and objective; (2) an evaluation system must encourage improvements in teaching skills, techniques, and abilities by identifying areas needing improvement; (3) an evaluation system must provide a mechanism to make meaningful distinctions among teachers and to acknowledge, recognize, and encourage superior teaching performance; and (4) an evaluation system must encourage respect in the evaluation process by the persons conducting the evaluations and the persons subject to the evaluations through recognizing the importance of objective standards and minimizing subjectivity.” Additionally, the parties agree that the evaluation process is one which will be implemented in cooperation between the evaluator and the bargaining unit member, as described in WAC ▇▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇: “To identify, in consultation with classroom teachers and certificated support personnel observed, particular areas in which their professional performance is satisfactory or outstanding, and particular areas in which the classroom teacher or support person needs to improve his or her performance.” WAC 392.191.025
Evaluation System Preamble. The evaluation system for instructional staff includes, but is not limited to, the following elements, goals, and objectives. 14.1. 1The evaluation procedures set forth herein shall be designed to improve the educational program by improving the quality of instruction. 14.1. 2The evaluation process shall recognize strengths, identify areas needing improvement, and provide support for professional growth.
Evaluation System Preamble. An evaluation system for teachers has the following elements, goals, and objectives:
Evaluation System Preamble. An evaluation system for teachers has the following elements, goals, and objectives: 1. The evaluation procedures set forth herein shall be to improve the educational program by improving the quality of instruction. 2. The evaluation process shall recognize strengths, identify areas needing improvement, and provide support for professional growth. 3. Within the selected instructional framework teachers will be allowed to exercise their professional judgment and will be evaluated on their own practice, skills, and knowledge as related to state law. 4. An evaluation system should be grounded in trust and respect by all parties through the use of objective standards and by minimizing subjectivity. The parties agree that the following evaluation system is to be implemented in a manner consistent with good faith and mutual respect and, as defined in RCW 28A.405.110 (1), “An evaluation system must be meaningful, helpful, and objective;
Evaluation System Preamble. The parties agree that the following evaluation system is to be implemented in a manner consistent with good faith and mutual respect and, as defined in RCW 28A.405.110, “An evaluation system must be meaningful, helpful, and objective; (2) an evaluation system must encourage improvements in teaching skills, techniques, and abilities by identifying areas needing improvement; (3) an evaluation system must provide a mechanism to make meaningful distinctions among teachers and to acknowledge, recognize, and encourage superior teaching performance, and (4) an evaluation system must encourage respect in the evaluation process by the persons conducting the evaluations and the persons subject to the evaluations through recognizing the importance of objective standards and minimizing subjectivity.
Evaluation System Preamble. The parties agree that the following evaluation system is to be implemented in a manner consistent with good faith and mutual respect and, as defined in RCW 28A.405.110, “An evaluation system must be meaningful, helpful, and objective;
Evaluation System Preamble. An evaluation system for teachers has the following elements, goals, and objectives: 1. The evaluation procedures set forth herein shall be designed to improve the educational program by improving the quality of instruction. 2. The evaluation process shall recognize strengths, identify areas needing improvement, and provide support for professional growth. 3. Within the selected instructional framework teachers will be allowed to exercise their professional judgment and will be evaluated on their own practice, skills, and knowledge. 4. An evaluation system should be grounded in trust and respect by all parties through the use of objective standards and by minimizing subjectivity. The following evaluation system shall be implemented in a manner consistent with good faith and mutual respect and, as defined in RCW 28A.405.110 (1), “An evaluation system must be meaningful, helpful, and objective; (2) an evaluation system must encourage improvements in teaching skills, techniques, and abilities by identifying areas needing improvement; (3) an evaluation system must provide a mechanism to make meaningful distinctions among teachers and to acknowledge, recognize, and encourage superior teaching performance; and (4) an evaluation system must encourage respect in the evaluation process by the persons conducting the evaluations and the persons subject to the evaluations through recognizing the importance of objective standards and minimizing subjectivity.” Additionally, the evaluation process will be implemented with collaboration between the evaluator and the teacher, as described in WAC ▇▇▇- ▇▇▇-▇▇▇: 1. “To identify in consultation with classroom teachers and certificated support personnel observed, particular areas in which their professional performance is satisfactory or outstanding, and particular areas in which the classroom teacher or support personneeds to improve his or her performance. 2. To assist classroom teachers and certificated support personnel, who have identifiedareas needing improvement, in making those improvements 3. To identify classroom teachers or certificated support personnel whoseprofessional performance is unsatisfactory and for whom remediation is needed.
Evaluation System Preamble 

Related to Evaluation System Preamble

  • Information Systems The Customer is aware that vehicles manufactured, supplied or marketed by a company within the Volvo Group are equipped with one or more systems which may gather and store information about the vehicle (the “Information Systems”), including but not limited to information relating to vehicle condition and performance and information relating to the operation of the vehicle (together, the “Vehicle Data”). The Customer agrees not to interfere with the operation of the Information System in any way.

  • DTC DIRECT REGISTRATION SYSTEM AND PROFILE MODIFICATION SYSTEM (a) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 2.04, the parties acknowledge that the Direct Registration System (“DRS”) and Profile Modification System (“Profile”) shall apply to uncertificated American Depositary Shares upon acceptance thereof to DRS by DTC. DRS is the system administered by DTC pursuant to which the Depositary may register the ownership of uncertificated American Depositary Shares, which ownership shall be evidenced by periodic statements issued by the Depositary to the Owners entitled thereto. Profile is a required feature of DRS which allows a DTC participant, claiming to act on behalf of an Owner of American Depositary Shares, to direct the Depositary to register a transfer of those American Depositary Shares to DTC or its nominee and to deliver those American Depositary Shares to the DTC account of that DTC participant without receipt by the Depositary of prior authorization from the Owner to register such transfer. (b) In connection with and in accordance with the arrangements and procedures relating to DRS/Profile, the parties understand that the Depositary will not verify, determine or otherwise ascertain that the DTC participant which is claiming to be acting on behalf of an Owner in requesting a registration of transfer and delivery as described in subsection (a) has the actual authority to act on behalf of the Owner (notwithstanding any requirements under the Uniform Commercial Code). For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of Sections 5.03 and 5.08 shall apply to the matters arising from the use of the DRS. The parties agree that the Depositary’s reliance on and compliance with instructions received by the Depositary through the DRS/Profile System and in accordance with this Deposit Agreement shall not constitute negligence or bad faith on the part of the Depositary.

  • Access to Information Systems Access, if any, to DXC’s Information Systems is granted solely to perform the Services under this Order, and is limited to those specific DXC Information Systems, time periods and personnel as are separately agreed to by DXC and Supplier from time to time. DXC may require Supplier’s employees, subcontractors or agents to sign individual agreements prior to access to DXC’s Information Systems. Use of DXC Information Systems during other time periods or by individuals not authorized by DXC is expressly prohibited. Access is subject to DXC business control and information protection policies, standards and guidelines as may be modified from time to time. Use of any other DXC Information Systems is expressly prohibited. This prohibition applies even when an DXC Information System that Supplier is authorized to access, serves as a gateway to other Information Systems outside Supplier’s scope of authorization. Supplier agrees to access Information Systems only from specific locations approved for access by DXC. For access outside of DXC premises, DXC will designate the specific network connections to be used to access Information Systems.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Information Systems Acquisition Development and Maintenance a. Client Data – Client Data will only be used by State Street for the purposes specified in this Agreement.