Example Calculations Sample Clauses

Example Calculations. To demonstrate the application of provisions related to [redacted], example calculations are set forth in Appendix B.

Example Calculations. This section provides example calculations of the maximum allowable HVIP voucher amount, based upon assumptions regarding other potential funding sources. These examples are for illustrative purposes only. The actual maximum voucher amount will depend upon each specific circumstance. EXAMPLE 1: A local air district grant provides $100,000 to a private fleet to replace an old truck with a new $140,000 diesel truck of 35,000 lbs GVWR. HVIP augments this grant by providing a $150,000 voucher for the purchaser to upgrade to a $300,000 zero-emission truck. The zero-emission truck incremental cost is $160,000. HVIP voucher amount combined with the air district funding cannot exceed 90 percent of the zero-emission vehicle purchase cost (excluding taxes and fees). HVIP funding may not pay for any taxes or fees. Taxes and fees must be paid for by another funding source. EXAMPLE 2: Transit agencies receive an 80 percent grant from the FTA for most new vehicle purchases, including new zero-emission vehicle purchases. For example, suppose a public transit agency receives a EXAMPLE 3: A trucking fleet is replacing a 2009 Class 8 truck with a new zero-emission truck. The fleet has secured funding from the Volkswagen (VW)

Example Calculations. (i) For purposes of illustration only, if the EBITDA of the Surviving Corporation is One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) in a Measurement Period, then the Earn-Out Payment for such Measurement Period would be calculated as follows: [($1,000,000.00 - $750,000.00) * 3.333] = $833,250.00.] (ii) For purposes of illustration only, if the EBITDA of the Surviving Corporation is Seven Hundred Thousand Dollars ($700,000.00) in a Measurement Period, then no Earn-Out Payment would be due for such Measurement Period because the EBITDA Target was not achieved in such Measurement Period. (iii) For purposes of illustration only, if the Surviving Corporation’s EBITDA is Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) in a Measurement Period, then the Earn-Out Payment would be calculated as follows: [($2,000,000.00 - $750,000.00) * 3.333] = $2,500,000 by virtue of the operation of the Measurement Period Earn-Out Payment cap described above.

Example Calculations. By way of an example only, if property, subject to City Resolution Nos. 927 and 928, is annexed on April 18, 2023, during Year 1 of this Agreement, that property will be placed on the City’s certified tax rolls on January 1, 2024. A tax bill will be issued in the Fall of 2024, with the maintenance and operations tax payment being due by January 31, 2025. If the maintenance and operations tax payment amount is $700 (and no portion of that amount is attributable to improvements made to the Property post-annexation), and the $700 in taxes is timely paid by the property owner and collected by the City, then the no-contest payment for the 2024 tax year would be $700. If the property owner has not asserted an Annexation Challenge to the annexation of the property owner’s property during 2024, then the City would pay to the property owner a sum of $700 (i.e., 100% within 90 days of receipt of the tax payment by the City). This process would be repeated for Year 2 of the Agreement provided that the Year 2 taxes (i.e., 2025 taxes due in 2026) are timely paid by the property owner and collected by the City, and the property owner has not asserted an Annexation Challenge to the annexation of the property during Year 2 of this Agreement. Years 3 through 6 would follow the same process with 100% of the taxes paid; with Year 7 being paid at 80% of the taxes paid; Year 8 being paid at 60% of the taxes paid; Year 9 being paid at 40% of the taxes paid; and Year 10 being paid at 20% of the taxes paid.

Example Calculations. ‌ Some example calculations, based on the case studies used in the CRD Guidance (Chemicals Regulation Directorate), have been undertaken, and the comparisons are given in the tables below. Exposures are mg/kg Acute - BROWSE centiles Longer-term BROWSE centiles CRD median 75th 95th median 75th 95th direct dermal 1.51E-04 4.19E-04 1.77E-03 2.16E-05 5.99E-05 2.52E-04 1.77E-04 spray inhalation 3.32E-06 4.29E-06 6.30E-06 4.74E-07 6.13E-07 9.01E-07 1.04E-04 direct dermal 6.41E-04 1.77E-03 7.57E-03 9.15E-05 2.53E-04 1.08E-03 7.08E-04 spray inhalation 3.12E-05 4.34E-05 6.95E-05 4.46E-06 6.21E-06 9.93E-06 4.16E-04 Acute - BROWSE centiles Longer-term BROWSE centiles CRD median 75th 95th median 75th 95th indirect dermal 2.05E-04 5.59E-04 2.14E-03 4.61E-04 1.18E-03 3.89E-03 7.50E-05 indirect ingestion 1.18E-06 2.89E-06 9.77E-06 2.66E-06 6.04E-06 1.72E-05 1.65E-05 Example output from BROWSE model version 4.4 compared with CRD case study for orchard sprayers. Exposures are mg/kg Acute -BROWSE centiles Longer-term - BROWSE centiles CRD direct dermal 1.64E-04 5.09E-04 2.52E-03 2.34E-05 7.25E-05 3.60E-04 3.28E-03 spray inhalation 1.46E-05 2.69E-05 5.94E-05 2.10E-06 3.85E-06 8.46E-06 1.04E-05 direct dermal 6.78E-04 2.13E-03 1.05E-02 9.57E-05 3.02E-04 1.50E-03 1.31E-02 spray inhalation 1.35E-04 2.61E-04 5.72E-04 1.93E-05 3.73E-05 8.24E-05 4.16E-05 Acute -BROWSE centiles Longer-term - BROWSE centiles CRD indirect dermal 1.44E-03 4.21E-03 1.66E-02 2.84E-03 7.48E-03 1.48E-01 1.98E-04 indirect ingestion 8.20E-06 2.19E-05 7.61E-05 1.64E-05 3.85E-05 1.11E-04 4.50E-05 Predicted exposures from a low volatility a.s. (vapour pressure = 0.0001 Pa at 20 C) for two locations Exposures are µg/kg Northern Southern (Spain) median 75th centile 95th centile median 75th centile 95th centile CRD adult acute 0.114 0.176 0.367 0.636 0.927 1.51 0.253 adult longer term 0.0416 0.0606 0.118 3.09 4.49 7.28 child acute 0.553 0.846 1.76 0.25 0.324 0.452 0.6 child longer term 0.2 0.289 0.56 1.21 1.56 2.13 1.7 Comparison between BROWSE and existing models of bystander and resident exposure‌ Comparing the results of the BROWSE model with exposure assessment models is not straightforward because of the different approaches taken. A separate report has been provided by BPI which considered the comparison between the two main existing models (Germany and UK) and some results produced by the BROWSE model for boom sprayer applications. While this showed significantly greater exposures from BROWSE using a similar...

Example Calculations. F.6.1 The following examples illustrate the man- 4/2/82 ner in which calculations of Assigned Fuel Expenses, Fuel Expense Credits and As­signed Fuel Expense Debits are made under four scenarios with differing assumptions.

Example Calculations. The following examples for the calculations in Section 3.3(a) and (b) above are provided for clarity: Example 1 – If SK hynix were to acquire a business which was unlicensed by Rambus which had [***] in revenue from Reference Products over the four quarters preceding the acquisition and SK hynix had twenty billion US dollars (US$20,000,000,000) in revenue from Reference Products over the same time period, and if there had not been any previous acquisitions by SK hynix, then the Acquisition Coefficient would be calculated as follows: Acquisition Coefficient = ((1 + [***]/20,000,000,000) * 1) = [***] Example 2 – If subsequent to the acquisition in Example 1, SK hynix were to acquire a business which was licensed by Rambus which had [***] in revenue from Reference Products over the four quarters preceding the acquisition and SK hynix had twenty-five billion US dollars (US$25,000,000,000) in revenue from Reference Products over the same time period, such acquired business paid an average of three million US dollars (US$3,000,000) per quarter over the same period, and the most recent Quarterly Base Amount was eleven million US dollars (US$11,000,000), then the Acquisition Coefficient would be calculated as follows: Acquisition Coefficient (per 3.3(b)(i)) = (1 + [***]/25,000,000,000) * [***] = [***] Acquisition Coefficient (per 3.3(b)(ii)) = (3,000,000/11,000,000) + [***] = [***] Therefore, the Acquisition Coefficient after the acquisition in Example 2 would be the lesser of the two values above, or [***].”

Example Calculations. Coop’s calculation of an example of the valuation of the Ordinary Units for the Regular Put Price and Call Price shall be part of the three-month period reporting of the Coop and shall be provided to each of the members of the Joday Group who continue to have any exercisable rights under this Schedule A, as soon as available after the end of each three-month period, and in any event within 45 days after the end of each such three-month period; it being understood that this does not in any manner affect the right of the Unitholders to dispute the valuation of the Ordinary Units pursuant to and in accordance with Annex 2 and no party hereto waives any right they have under Annex 2. [insert place and date] To: [Constellation, Listco, and the Coop] From: [●] Re: Exercise of Regular Put Option On [●] 2020, certain parties entered into an Investor Rights and Governance Agreement (the “IRGA”). Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalised terms in this notice shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the IRGA. 1. I hereby give notice of my exercise of the put option pursuant to Section 6(a) of Schedule A to the IRGA in respect of [●] Ordinary Units and [●] Preference Units (which number of Preference Units is equivalent, on a percentage basis, to the percentage of Ordinary Units which are hereby being put, over my total number of Ordinary Units now owned). This letter constitutes a Regular Put Notice. 2. Subject to the terms and conditions of the IRGA, the transfer of the Regular Put Units shall take place within 30 Business Days as from the date of this Regular Put Notice against payment of the respective consideration in full and in cash to the following bank account: [●]. We acknowledge that this notice is irrevocable. This notice is governed by the laws of the Netherlands. Yours sincerely, [insert place and date] To: [Constellation, Listco, and the Coop] From: [●] Re: Exercise of CSI Change of Control Put Option On [●] 2020, certain parties entered into an Investor Rights and Governance Agreement (the “IRGA”). Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalised terms in this notice shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the IRGA. 1. I hereby give notice of my exercise of the put option pursuant to Section 6(b) of Schedule A to the IRGA in respect of [●] Ordinary Units and [●] Preference Units (which number of Preference Units is equivalent, on a percentage basis, to the percentage of Ordinary Units which are hereby being put, over my total number of Ordinary Uni...

Example Calculations. For illustrative purposes only, attached hereto as Exhibit 5.3 are sample calculations of Deficiency Charges, Makewhole Volumes and Excess Product Volumes.