Exceptions Related to Counting for Existing CHP Facilities Clause Samples

Exceptions Related to Counting for Existing CHP Facilities. 5.2.4.1 To the extent the full net output is offered by an Existing CHP Facility but is not procured by the IOU, only the capacity procured by an IOU shall count towards any IOU’s MW Target. 5.2.4.1.1 For example – if a 50 MW capacity CHP Facility from the July 2010 Semi-Annual Report offers 40 MW for procurement, and the IOU procures less than 40 MW, only the capacity procured will count towards the IOU’s MW Target. If the CHP Facility sells the full 40 MW offered, then the IOU may count the full 50 MW of capacity reported in the July 2010 Semi-Annual Report. 5.2.4.2 Coal-fired, wood waste, and renewable QFs in an IOU’s portfolio as of July 2010 will not count towards the IOU’s MW Targets.‌‌‌ 5.2.4.3 Any Existing CHP Facility that does not export power to the grid will not count toward the IOU’s MW Target, including existing SGIP facilities. 5.2.4.4 If an IOU contracts with an Existing CHP Facility that is currently operating in the State but has never sold to an IOU, the capacity from such CHP Facility will be determined by a Capacity Demonstration Test. This test will determine the CHP Facility’s capability to serve on site and PUC §218(b) loads and provide net exports to the grid, excluding auxiliary/station power load. 5.2.4.4.1 If a CHP Facility elects and is eligible under the Optional As- Available Program, the specific counting rules of that program shall apply for the purpose of calculating the subscription cap in the Optional As Available Program.
View SourceView Similar (2)

Related to Exceptions Related to Counting for Existing CHP Facilities

  • Responsibility for Equipment City shall not be responsible for any damage to persons or property as a result of the use, misuse or failure of any equipment used by Contractor, or by any of its employees, even though such equipment be furnished, rented or loaned to Contractor by City.

  • Responsibility for Evaluation Within each school the Principal will be responsible for the evaluation of employees assigned to that school. Evaluation will be made by the Principal or a qualified administrator. An employee assigned to more than one school will be evaluated by the Principal of the school in which the employee is assigned for the greater amount of time, with input provided by the Principal of the other school. Any Principal or person charged with the responsibility of evaluation of employees may involve other staff and students in the process if acceptable to the certificated teacher being evaluated.

  • SCOPE OF ARCHITECT’S BASIC SERVICES 3.1 The Architect’s Basic Services consist of those described in this Article 3 and include usual and customary structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering services. Services not set forth in this Article 3 are Supplemental or Additional Services. § 3.1.1 The Architect shall manage the Architect’s services, research applicable design criteria, attend Project meetings, communicate with members of the Project team, and report progress to the Owner. § 3.1.2 The Architect shall coordinate its services with those services provided by the Owner and the Owner’s consultants. The Architect shall be entitled to rely on, and shall not be responsible for, the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of, services and information furnished by the Owner and the Owner’s consultants. The Architect shall provide prompt written notice to the Owner if the Architect becomes aware of any error, omission, or inconsistency in such services or information. § 3.1.3 As soon as practicable after the date of this Agreement, the Architect shall submit for the Owner’s approval a schedule for the performance of the Architect’s services. The schedule initially shall include anticipated dates for the commencement of construction and for Substantial Completion of the Work as set forth in the Initial Information. The schedule shall include allowances for periods of time required for the Owner’s review, for the performance of the Owner’s consultants, and for approval of submissions by authorities having jurisdiction over the Project. Once approved by the Owner, time limits established by the schedule shall not, except for reasonable cause, be exceeded by the Architect or Owner. With the Owner’s approval, the Architect shall adjust the schedule, if necessary, as the Project proceeds until the commencement of construction. § 3.1.4 The Architect shall not be responsible for an Owner’s directive or substitution, or for the Owner’s acceptance of non-conforming Work, made or given without the Architect’s written approval. § 3.1.5 The Architect shall contact governmental authorities required to approve the Construction Documents and entities providing utility services to the Project. The Architect shall respond to applicable design requirements imposed by those authorities and entities. § 3.1.6 The Architect shall assist the Owner in connection with the Owner’s responsibility for filing documents required for the approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project.

  • Requirements for E- Bidders 3.1. For Individual/ Joint E-Bidders, the following documents shall be uploaded during online registration; 3.1.1. Copy of Identification Documents (both sides) 3.1.2. Evidence of deposit payment 3.2. For Agent acting for Individual/ Joint Online Bidders, the following documents shall be uploaded during online registration; 3.2.1. Copy of Identification Documents (both sides) of Individual/ Joint Online Bidder 3.2.2. Copy of Identification Documents (both sides) of Agent 3.2.3. Copy of letter of authorization to bid 3.2.4. Evidence of deposit payment 3.3. For Company, the following documents shall be uploaded during online registration: 3.3.1. Copy of Identification Documents (both sides) of the representative. 3.3.2. Copy of letter of authorization to bid under the Company’s Letter Head 3.3.3. Form 24; Form 44; Form 49 (or their equivalent forms under the Companies Act 2016)

  • Responsibility for Environmental Contamination 5.20.1 Neither Party shall be liable to the other for any costs whatsoever resulting from the presence or release of any Environmental Hazard that either Party did not introduce to the affected Work Location. Both Parties shall defend and hold harmless the other, its officers, directors and employees from and against any losses, damages, claims, demands, suits, liabilities, fines, penalties and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees) that arise out of or result from (i) any Environmental Hazard that the Indemnifying Party, its contractors or agents introduce to the Work Locations or (ii) the presence or release of any Environmental Hazard for which the Indemnifying Party is responsible under Applicable Law. 5.20.2 In the event any suspect materials within Qwest-owned, operated or leased facilities are identified to be asbestos containing, CLEC will ensure that to the extent any activities which it undertakes in the facility disturb such suspect materials, such CLEC activities will be in accordance with applicable local, state and federal environmental and health and safety statutes and regulations. Except for abatement activities undertaken by CLEC or equipment placement activities that result in the generation of asbestos-containing material, CLEC does not have any responsibility for managing, nor is it the owner of, nor does it have any liability for, or in connection with, any asbestos-containing material. Qwest agrees to immediately notify CLEC if Qwest undertakes any asbestos control or asbestos abatement activities that potentially could affect CLEC personnel, equipment or operations, including, but not limited to, contamination of equipment.