Historical Transaction Amounts Sample Clauses
Historical Transaction Amounts. The table below sets out the historical transaction amounts of the Product Sales Transaction for the three years ended December 31, 2019, 2020, 2021 and nine months ended September 30, 2022. (in US$ millions) 2019 2020 2021 2022 Product Sales Transaction Proposed Product Sales Annual Caps 704.1 493.8 523.0 383.6 The Proposed Product Sales Annual Caps for each of the three years ending December 31, 2023, 2024 and 2025 are set forth below, which was determined primarily with reference to projections of the Company which in turn are prepared by the Company mainly with reference to the following major factors: • the latest available actual amounts of the transactions under the Product Purchase Transaction and the Product Sales Transaction during the period from January 1, 2019 to September 30, 2022 (both dates inclusive); • the expected growth of the Group’s products; • the expected growth of the Group’s existing businesses between 2023 and 2025 in view of the Company’s investment and acquisition activities from time to time; • the production strategy as a result of the Group’s production costs control measures; and • a buffer of 10% due to uncertainties in the external environment. (in US$ millions) ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ Proposed Product Sales Annual Caps 660.0 706.0 756.0 On November 18, 2022, the Company and Hon Hai agreed upon the terms and conditions of the Framework Purchase Agreement pursuant to which the Company has agreed to purchase from Hon Hai Group gold salts as raw materials, ancillary materials and semi-finished components and assembled products from time to time upon and subject to the terms and conditions thereof. The Company and Hon Hai had entered into an agreement on substantially the same terms for a term from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022. For details, please refer to the announcement of the Company dated November 25, 2019 and the circular of the Company dated December 4, 2019. The principal terms of the Framework Purchase Agreement are set out as follows:
Historical Transaction Amounts. No amount was payable by the Group for the use of the ▇▇▇▇▇ Trademarks and ▇▇▇▇▇ Names for the years ended 31 December 2018, 2019 and 2020. No amount was payable by the Group for the use of the ▇▇▇▇▇ Express Trademarks and ▇▇▇▇▇ Express Names for the years ended 31 December 2018 and 2019 and HK$100 was paid by KE Thailand for the use of ▇▇▇▇▇ Express Trademarks and ▇▇▇▇▇ Express Names for the year ended 2020. The Group have adopted the ▇▇▇▇▇ Trademarks and the ▇▇▇▇▇ Names across all the international markets in which the Company operates and in connection with the Partial Offer. As the Controlling Shareholders are expected to continue to be involved in the Company as significant Shareholders (i.e., in excess of 30%) and in order for the Company to continue to retain a clear brand identity and culture, the Company has requested the ongoing use of the ▇▇▇▇▇ Trademarks and the ▇▇▇▇▇ Names. KE Thailand and its subsidiary have adopted the ▇▇▇▇▇ Express Trademarks and ▇▇▇▇▇ Express Names in Thailand and in connection with the Partial Offer, KE Thailand has requested the ongoing use of the ▇▇▇▇▇ Express Trademarks and ▇▇▇▇▇ Express Names. The Directors (excluding the members of the LR Independent Board Committee and the Code Independent Board Committee whose view will be given after having been advised by the Independent Financial Adviser) believe that the Brand Licence Agreements are fair and reasonable and in the best interests of the Company and its Shareholders as a whole.
Historical Transaction Amounts. The aggregate amounts paid by CR Cement, its subsidiaries and associates to the Group in relation to power supply by the Group for the nine months ended 30 September 2016 amounted to RMB101 million (equivalent to approximately HK$119 million. No power supply transactions had been conducted between the Group and CR Cement, its subsidiaries and associates for the years ended 31 December 2014 and 2015.
Historical Transaction Amounts. The aggregate purchase price paid by our Group to Daoming Company for the three financial years ended 31 December 2017, 2018 and 2019 and the six months ended 30 June 2020 were approximately HK$9,170,000, HK$11,919,000, HK$6,568,000 and HK$1,129,000, respectively. The fluctuations in historical transaction amounts are mainly due to the fact that (i) our Group made certain purchases from suppliers who are Independent Third Parties and who offered prices lower than Daoming Company and
Historical Transaction Amounts. Members of the ▇▇▇▇ Metal Group had been providing services similar to those set out in the Services Framework Agreement to the Parent Company and its subsidiaries in the three years ended 31 December 2008, 2009, 2010 and the six months ended 30 June 2011. The aggregate amount paid by the Parent Company and its subsidiaries for such services amounted to approximately RMB2,060,000, RMB1,250,000, RMB7,430,000 and RMB2,130,000 for the three years ended 31 December 2008, 2009, 2010 and the six months ended 30 June 2011, respectively.
Historical Transaction Amounts. For each of the two years ended 31 December 2021 and 2022 and the six months ended 30 June 2023, the historical transaction amounts paid by Poly Developments and Holdings Group to the Group in respect of other value- added services under the 2021-2023 Other Value-added Services Framework Agreement were RMB458.0 million, RMB598.1 million and RMB292.8 million, respectively.
Historical Transaction Amounts. The table below sets out the historical transaction amounts of the Logistics Transaction for the three years ended December 31, 2019, 2020, 2021 and nine months ended September 30, 2022.
Historical Transaction Amounts. The historical amounts of the fees incurred under the Xingbei Partnership Agreement are as follows:
Historical Transaction Amounts. During the Track Record Period, the total fee paid by us was nil as the Intellectual Property Licensing Agreement was on a royalty-free basis. Pursuant to the Intellectual Property Licensing Agreement, the license will continue to be royalty- free. Our Group has been using the Licensed Intellectual Properties on a royalty-free basis for a number of years in the PRC. We intend to continue to use the Licensed Intellectual Properties in such connection after the [REDACTED]. Our Directors consider that entering into the Intellectual Property Licensing Agreement for a duration longer than three years is reasonable and justifiable to ensure the stability of our operations. The term of the Intellectual Property Licensing Agreement ensures our ongoing operations are not interrupted and is a usual business practice. Our Directors consider the Intellectual Property Licensing Agreement to be beneficial to the interests of our Company and our Shareholders as a whole. On the basis that (i) the Intellectual Property Licensing Agreement is beneficial to our business;
Historical Transaction Amounts. According to the audited historical amounts of the Group for the 2 financial years ended 31 December 2010 and 2011 respectively and the unaudited historical amounts of the Group for the 7 months ended 31 July 2012, the historical amounts of consideration in respect of the reinsurance services provided by CTPI (HK) to members of the TPG Group and the Connected Subsidiaries are set out below: HK$’000 Gross premium income ceded by the members of the TPG Group and the Connected Subsidiaries and underwritten by CTPI (HK) 93 157 5,115 Commission expenses paid by CTPI (HK) to members of the TPG Group and the Connected Subsidiaries