Identification and Determination of Potential ARARs Sample Clauses
Identification and Determination of Potential ARARs. 1. For those primary document s or secon dary document s that con sist of or include ▇▇▇▇ determinations, prior to DOE’s issuance of a document, the Parties shall confer to identify and propose, to the best of their ability, all potential ARARs pertinent to the document being addressed. ARARs determinations shall be prepared by the DOE in accordance with Section 121(d)(2) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9621(d)(2), the NCP, and pertinent guidance issued by EPA not inconsistent with CERCLA.
2. In identifying the potential ARARs listed in Appendix A, the Parties recognize that actual ARARs can be identified only on an operable unit- specific basis and that ARARs depend upon the specific hazardous substances, pollutants or conta minants a t a site, the particular actions proposed as a remedy and the characteristics of a operable unit. The Parties recognize that ARARs identification is necessarily an iterative process and that potential ARARs must be re-examined throughout the RFI/RI and CMS/FS processes until the CA/RA(s) is implemented.
Identification and Determination of Potential ARARs. 1. For those primary reports or secondary documents that consist of or include ▇▇▇▇ determinations, prior to the issuance of a D1 report, the Parties shall confer to identify and propose, to the best of their ability, all potential ARARs pertinent to the report being addressed. D1 ARARs determinations shall be prepared by the DOE in accordance with Section 121(d)(2) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9621(d)(2), the NCP, and pertinent guidance issued by EPA.
2. In identifying potential ARARs, the Parties recognize that actual ARARs can be identified only on a site- specific basis and that ARARs depend upon the specific hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants at a site, the particular actions proposed as a remedy and the characteristics of a site. The Parties recognize that ARARs identification is necessarily an iterative process and that potential ARARs must be re-examined throughout the RI/FS and RD processes until the RA is implemented.
Identification and Determination of Potential ARARs. 1. For those primary reports or secondary documents that consist of or include ▇▇▇▇ determinations, prior to the issuance of a draft report, the Project Managers should meet to identify and propose, to the best of their ability, potential ARARs pertinent to the report being addressed. The State shall identify all potential State ARARs as early in the remedial process as possible consistent with the requirements of CERCLA Section 121, 42 U.S.C. Section §9621, and the NCP. The Corps shall consider any written interpretations of ARARs provided by the State. Draft ▇▇▇▇ determinations shall be prepared by the Corps in accordance with Section 121(d)(2) of CERCLA, the NCP and pertinent guidance issued by EPA, which is not inconsistent with CERCLA and the NCP.
2. In identifying potential ARARs, the Parties recognize that actual ARARs can be identified only on a site-specific basis and that ARARs depend on the specific hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants at a site, the particular actions proposed as a remedy and the characteristics of a site. The Parties recognize that ▇▇▇▇ identification is necessarily an iterative process and that potential ARARs must be re-examined throughout the RI/FS process until a ROD is issued.
Identification and Determination of Potential ARARs. A. For those Primary Documents or Secondary Documents that consist of or include ▇▇▇▇ determinations, the Parties’ Project Managers shall meet prior to the issuance of a draft report to identify and propose, to the best of their ability, all potential ARARs pertinent to the document being addressed. At that time, EPA, the Commonwealth, and Interior shall identify all potential ARARs for their respective entities as required by CERCLA Section 121(d)(2)(A)(ii), 42 U.S.C. § 9621(d)(2)(A)(ii), and the NCP that are pertinent to the document being addressed. Draft ▇▇▇▇ determinations shall be prepared by Navy in accordance with CERCLA Section 121, the NCP, and pertinent guidance issued by EPA, which is not inconsistent with CERCLA and the NCP.
B. In identifying potential ARARs, the Parties recognize that actual ARARs can be identified only on a site-specific basis and that ARARs depend on the specific hazardous substances, pollutants, and contaminants at an AOC or SSA, the particular actions being considered for a remedy, and the characteristics of an AOC or SSA. The Parties recognize that ▇▇▇▇ identification is necessarily an iterative process and that potential ARARs must be reexamined throughout the RI/FS process until a ROD is issued.
Identification and Determination of Potential ARARs. 8.10 For those primary documents or secondary documents that consist of or include ▇▇▇▇ determinations, the Project Managers shall meet prior to the issuance of a draft document, to identify and propose, to the best of their ability, all potential ARARs pertinent to the document being addressed. Draft ▇▇▇▇ determinations shall be prepared by U.S. DOE in accordance with Section 121 (d) (2) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9621 (d) (2), the NCP, and pertinent guidance issued by U.S. EPA and IDHW which is not inconsistent with CERCLA and the NCP.
8.11 In identifying potential ARARS, the Parties recognize that actual ARARs can be identified only on a site-specific basis and that ARARs depend on the specific hazardous substances at a site, the particular actions proposed as a remedy, and the characteristics of a site. The Parties recognize that ▇▇▇▇ identification is necessarily an iterative process and that potential ARARs must be reexamined throughout the RI/FS process until a ROD is issued.
Identification and Determination of Potential ARARs. (a) The RPMs shall meet to identify and propose, to the best of their ability, all potential ARARs prior to any relevant decision point identified in Subsection 9.2, including any permit-related requirements which may be a source of ARARs. In a timely manner, UDEQ shall identify potential State ARARs as required by CERCLA § 121(d)(2)(A)(ii) (42 U.S.C. § 9621(d)(2)(A)(ii)), which are pertinent to those activities for which it is responsible. USAF shall prepare draft ▇▇▇▇ determinations in accordance with EPA guidelines, rules, regulations, and criteria implementing CERCLA.
(b) In identifying potential ARARs, the Parties recognize that actual ARARs can be identified only on a site-specific basis and that ARARs depend on the specific hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants at a given Site or operable unit, the particular actions associated with the proposed remedy and the characteristics of the Site or operable unit. The Parties recognize that a reexamination of ARARs may become necessary during the RI/FS process until a ROD is issued. Disagreements between the RPMs about ARARs are subject to the provisions of Section 14 (Dispute Resolution) of this Agreement.
Identification and Determination of Potential ARARs. (a) For those primary reports or secondary documents that consist of, or include ARAB determinations, prior to the issuance of a draft report, the Project Managers shall meet to identify and propose, to the best of their ability, all potential ARARs pertinent to the report being addressed, including any permitting requirements which may be a source of ARARs. The State shall identify all potential state ARARs as early in the remedial process as possible consistent with the requirements of CERCLA Section 121, 42 U.S.C. 9621, and the NCP. The A▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇n interpretation of ARARs provided by the State. Draft ARAR determinations shall be prepared by the Air Force ▇▇ accordance with CERCLA Section 121(d)(2), 42 U.S.C. 9621(d)(2), the NCP and pertinent guidance issued by EPA that is consistent with CERCLA and the NCP.
(b) In identifying potential ARARs, the parties recognize that actual ARARS can be identified only on a site-specific basis and that actual ARARs depend on the specific hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants at an Area of Concern, the particular actions proposed as a remedy and characteristics of an Area of Concern. The Parties recognize that ARAR identification is necessarily an iterative process and that potential ARARs must be re-examined throughout the RI/FS process until a ROD is issued.
Identification and Determination of Potential ARARs. For those primary reports or secondary documents that consist of, or include ARAB determinations, prior to the issuance of a draft report, the Project Managers shall meet to identify and propose, to the best of their ability, all potential ARARs pertinent to the report being addressed, including any permitting requirements which may be a source of ARARs. The State shall identify all potential state ARARs as early in the remedial process as possible consistent with the requirements of ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇.▇.▇. ▇▇▇▇, and the NCP. The Air Force shall consider any written interpretation of ARARs provided by the State. Draft ▇▇▇▇ determinations shall be prepared by the Air Force in accordance with CERCLA Section 121(d)(2), 42 U.S.C. 9621(d)(2), the NCP and pertinent guidance issued by EPA that is consistent with CERCLA and the NCP.
Identification and Determination of Potential ARARs. 10.6.1 For those Primary Documents or Secondary Documents that consist of or include ▇▇▇▇ determinations, the Project Managers shall meet prior to the issuance of a draft report, to identify and propose, to the best of their ability, all potential ARARs pertinent to the document being addressed.
10.6.2 The Air Force shall consider any written interpretations of ARARs provided by the NJDEP. Draft ▇▇▇▇ determinations shall be prepared by the Air Force in accordance with CERCLA Section 121(d)(2), the NCP, and pertinent Guidance issued by EPA that is not inconsistent with CERCLA and the NCP.
10.6.3 In identifying potential ARARs, the Parties recognize that actual ARARs can be identified only on a site-specific basis and that ARARs depend on the specific hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants at a site, the particular actions proposed as a remedy and the characteristics of a site. The Parties recognize that ▇▇▇▇ identification is necessarily an iterative process and that potential ARARs must be reexamined throughout the RI/FS process until a ROD is issued.
Identification and Determination of Potential ARARs