IN CUSTOMS MATTERS Sample Clauses

IN CUSTOMS MATTERS. The Government of the Republic of Austria and the Government of the State of Israel, hereinafter referred to as the “Contracting Parties”;
View SourceView Similar (5)
IN CUSTOMS MATTERS. The Government of Japan and the Government of the United Mexican States, hereinafter referred to as “the Contracting Parties”, CONSIDERING that offenses against Customs legislation are prejudicial to the economic, fiscal, social, public health, cultural and commercial interests and the public security of their respective countries; CONSIDERING the importance of the accurate assessment of Customs duties and other taxes collected at importation or exportation and of ensuring proper enforcement of measures of prohibition, restriction and control; RECOGNIZING the need to strengthen international cooperation in matters related to the application and enforcement of the Customs legislation; CONVINCED that actions against Customs offenses can be made more effective by cooperation between their Customs Authorities; HAVING REGARD to the Recommendation of the Customs Cooperation Council on Mutual Administrative Assistance of 5 December 1953; Have agreed as follows:
View SourceView Similar (3)
IN CUSTOMS MATTERS. The Government of Japan and the Government of the Plurinational State of Bolivia (hereinafter referred to as “the Contracting Parties”), CONSIDERING that offences against Customs laws are prejudicial to the public security and the economic, fiscal, social, cultural, public health and commercial interests of their respective countries; CONSIDERING that illicit traffic in narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, weapons, explosives and chemical, biological and nuclear substances, which may be related to crimes in customs matters, constitutes a danger to public health and to society; CONSIDERING the importance of assuring the accurate assessment of customs duties and other taxes collected at importation or exportation, as well as of ensuring proper enforcement of prohibitions, restrictions and control measures by their Customs Administrations; RECOGNISING the need for international cooperation in matters related to the administration and enforcement of the Customs laws of their respective countries; HAVING regard to the international agreements containing prohibitions, restrictions and special measures of control in respect of specific goods; CONVINCED that actions against Customs offences can be made more effective by cooperation between their Customs Administrations; and HAVING regard to the Recommendation of the Customs Cooperation Council on Mutual Administrative Assistance of December 5, 1953, Have agreed as follows:
View SourceView Similar (2)
IN CUSTOMS MATTERS. The Customs Administration of Japan and the Macao Customs Service (hereinafter referred to as “the Customs Administrations”): Have reached common recognition on that the Customs Administrations will co-operate as follows:
View SourceView Similar (2)
IN CUSTOMS MATTERS. The Government of Japan and the Government of the Italian Republic, hereinafter referred to as the Contracting Parties, CONSIDERING that customs offences are prejudicial to the economic, commercial, fiscal, social, industrial and agricultural interests of their respective Countries as well as to legitimate trade; CONSIDERING the importance of the accurate assessment of customs duties and other taxes collected at importation or exportation and of ensuring proper enforcement of measures of prohibition, restriction and control, the latter also including those on enforcement of legal provisions and regulations on goods infringing intellectual property rights; RECOGNIZING the need for international cooperation in matters related to the application and enforcement of the customs law; CONVINCED that action against customs offences can be made more effective by close cooperation between their Customs Administrations, in particular, through the exchange of information; HAVING REGARD to the Recommendation of the Customs Cooperation Council on Mutual Administrative Assistance of 5 December 1953; HAVING REGARD to the Agreement between the Government of Japan and the European Community on co-operation and mutual administrative assistance in customs matters of 30 January 2008; HAVING REGARD to the international conventions containing prohibitions, restrictions, and special measures of control in respect of specific goods; TAKING INTO ACCOUNT the United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances of 20 December 1988; TAKING INTO ACCOUNT the UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property (Paris, 14 November 1970), insofar as this property was the subject of customs offences; TAKING INTO ACCOUNT the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (Washington, 3 March 1973) whose purpose is to protect these species by seeking to control international trade; TAKING INTO ACCOUNT the Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal –with Annex- (Basel, 22 March 1989) governing the transboundary movements, the recycling and the disposal of hazardous wastes; HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
View Source

Related to IN CUSTOMS MATTERS

  • Labour Matters No material work stoppage, strike, lock-out, labour disruption, dispute grievance, arbitration, proceeding or other conflict with the employees of the Corporation or the Subsidiaries currently exists or, to the knowledge of the Corporation, is imminent or pending and the Corporation and the Subsidiaries are in material compliance with all provisions of all federal, national, regional, provincial and local laws and regulations respecting employment and employment practices, terms and conditions of employment and wages and hours.

  • Procedures for Third Party Claims In the case of any claim for indemnification arising from a claim of a third-party other than an Infringement Claim subject to Section 13.3 above (a “Third-Party Claim”), a party seeking indemnification hereunder (each an “Indemnified Party”) shall give prompt written notice, following such Indemnified Party’s receipt of such claim or demand, to the party from which indemnity is sought (each an “Indemnifying Party”) of any claim or demand of which such Indemnified Party has knowledge and as to which it may request indemnification hereunder; provided, however, that failure to give such notice will not affect such Indemnified Party’s rights hereunder unless, and then solely to the extent that, the rights of the Indemnifying Parties from whom indemnity is sought are prejudiced as a result of such failure. The Indemnifying Party shall have the right (and if it elects to exercise such right, shall do so within twenty (20) days after receiving such notice from the Indemnified Party) to defend and to direct the defense against any such claim or demand, in its name or in the name of the Indemnified Party, as the case may be, at the expense of the Indemnifying Party, and with counsel selected by the Indemnifying Party; provided, that the Indemnifying Party shall be entitled to assume control of the defense of such action only if the Indemnifying Party acknowledges in writing its indemnity obligations and assumes and holds the Indemnified Party harmless from and against all Losses resulting from such Third-Party Claim; and provided further that the Indemnifying Party shall not be entitled to assume control of such defense if (i) the Indemnifying Party shall not have notified the Indemnified Party of its exercise of its right to defend such Third-Party claim within such twenty (20) day period; (ii) such claim or demand seeks an injunction or other equitable relief against the Indemnified Party, (iii) the Indemnified Party shall have reasonably concluded that (x) there is a conflict of interest between the Indemnified Party and the Indemnifying Party in the conduct of the defense of such claim or demand or (y) the Indemnified Party has one or more defenses not available to the Indemnifying Party, (iv) such claim relates to or arises in connection with any criminal proceeding, action, indictment, allegation or investigation, or (v) the appropriate court rules that the Indemnifying Party failed or is failing to vigorously prosecute or defend such Third-Party Claim. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the Indemnified Party shall, at the expense of the Indemnifying Party, cooperate with the Indemnifying Party, and keep the Indemnifying Party fully informed, in the defense of such claim or demand. The Indemnified Party shall have the right to participate in the defense of any claim or demand with counsel employed at its own expense; provided, however, that, in the case of any claim or demand described in clause (i) or (ii) of the second preceding sentence or as to which the Indemnifying Party shall not in fact have employed counsel to assume the defense of such claim or demand, the reasonable fees and disbursements of such counsel shall be at the expense of the Indemnifying Party. The Indemnifying Party shall have no indemnification obligations with respect to any such claim or demand which shall be settled by the Indemnified Party without the prior written consent of the Indemnifying Party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned. The Indemnifying Party shall not settle any such claim without the prior written consent of the Indemnified Party (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned if such settlement is accompanied by a document releasing the Indemnified Party from all liability with respect to the matter in controversy that is binding, valid and enforceable against all applicable Parties). Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Indemnified Party fails to object to the settlement within five (5) Business Days of receipt of a written notice from the Indemnifying Party containing the terms and condition of such settlement, the Indemnified Party shall be deemed to have consented to the settlement.

  • Procedural Matters The Trustee may maintain a proceeding even if it does not possess any of the Notes or does not produce any of them in such proceeding. A delay or omission by the Trustee or any Holder in exercising any right or remedy following an Event of Default will not impair the right or remedy or constitute a waiver of, or acquiescence in, such Event of Default. All remedies will be cumulative to the extent permitted by law.

  • Responsibility for Following Standards Each Party recognizes a responsibility to follow the standards that may be agreed to between the Parties and to employ characteristics and methods of operation that will not interfere with or impair the service, network or facilities of the other Party or any third parties connected with or involved directly in the network or facilities of the other.

  • Financial Matters (a) The Borrower has heretofore furnished to the Lender copies of (i) the audited consolidated balance sheets of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996, and the related statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the fiscal years then ended, together with the opinion of KPMG Peat Marwick thereon or PricewaterhouseCoopers, and (ii) the unaudited consolidated balance sheet of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries as of June 30, 1999, and the related statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the nine-month period then ended. Except as set forth in Schedule 4.11(a) attached hereto, such financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (subject, with respect to the unaudited financial statements, to the absence of notes required by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and to normal year-end audit adjustments) and present fairly the financial condition of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis as of the respective dates thereof and the consolidated results of operations of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries for the respective periods then ended. Except as fully reflected in the most recent financial statements referred to above and the notes thereto, there are no material liabilities or obligations with respect to the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries of any nature whatsoever (whether absolute, contingent or otherwise and whether or not due). (b) The Borrower has heretofore furnished to the Lender copies of the Annual Statements of each of the Insurance Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998, 1997, 1996 and 1995, and for the fiscal years then ended, each as filed with the relevant Insurance Regulatory Authority (collectively, the "Historical Statutory Statements"). Except as set forth in Schedule 4.11(b) attached hereto, the Historical Statutory Statements (including, without limitation, the provisions made therein for investments and the valuation thereof, reserves, policy and contract claims and statutory liabilities) have been prepared in accordance with Statutory Accounting Principles (except as may be reflected in the notes thereto and subject, with respect to the Quarterly Statements, to the absence of notes required by Statutory Accounting Principles and to normal year-end adjustments), were in compliance with applicable Requirements of Law when filed and present fairly the financial condition of the respective Insurance Subsidiaries covered thereby as of the respective dates thereof and the results of operations, changes in capital and surplus and cash flow of the respective Insurance Subsidiaries covered thereby for the respective periods then ended. Except for liabilities and obligations disclosed or provided for in the Historical Statutory Statements (including, without limitation, reserves, policy and contract claims and statutory liabilities), no Insurance Subsidiary had, as of the date of its respective Historical Statutory Statements, any material liabilities or obligations of any nature whatsoever (whether absolute, contingent or otherwise and whether or not due) that, in accordance with Statutory Accounting Principles, would have been required to have been disclosed or provided for in such Historical Statutory Statements. All books of account of each Insurance Subsidiary fully and fairly disclose all of its material transactions, properties, assets, investments, liabilities and obligations, are in its possession and are true, correct and complete in all material respects. (c) Each of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries, after giving effect to the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, (i) will have capital sufficient to carry on its businesses as conducted and as proposed to be conducted, (ii) will have assets with a fair saleable value, determined on a going concern basis, (A) not less than the amount required to pay the probable liability on its existing debts as they become absolute and matured and (B) greater than the total amount of its liabilities (including identified contingent liabilities, valued at the amount that can reasonably be expected to become absolute and matured), and (iii) will not intend to, and will not believe that it will, incur debts or liabilities beyond its ability to pay such debts and liabilities as they mature.