Initial Project Review Clause Samples

The Initial Project Review clause establishes a formal process for evaluating the project's scope, objectives, and requirements at the outset. Typically, this involves a meeting or documentation review between the parties to confirm mutual understanding of deliverables, timelines, and key milestones before substantive work begins. By ensuring both parties are aligned from the start, this clause helps prevent misunderstandings and disputes later in the project, promoting clarity and setting a solid foundation for successful project execution.
Initial Project Review. All Projects submitted to the Program shall be subject to the review process as detailed in the Contractor Resource Manual. With the exception of EmPower Electric Reduction (direct install) projects, it is strongly recommended that work not start on any project until the Participating Contractor has been notified that the submitted work scope has complied with Program requirements. This policy also applies to any field change order(s) submitted to the Program. Projects started without Program approval must be submitted to the Program no later than 14 days after the start of work. Program incentives will be calculated based upon the project submission date, not the date that work began on the project. Certain energy efficiency measures, including but not limited to windows and doors, may be subject to review by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and may require a SHPO form to be submitted and approved prior to commencement of work on these measures. See Contractor Resource Manual for further details. Any project that has been partially or fully completed prior to Project review and approval is at the Participating Contractor’s risk. In these cases, the Participating Contractor shall assume all financial liabilities associated with these projects (i.e., Contractor incentives and Program participant financing, as well as the value of the Program participant incentive and/or contractor incentive).
View SourceView Similar (5)
Initial Project Review. Screening Projects under Attachment 3 of the PA
View SourceView Similar (3)
Initial Project Review. In March 2007, the Napa County Board of Supervisors (the “Board”) received an initial application from Landowner for a General Plan amendment related to development of the Property. Following a series of City-County “study group” meetings in 2007-2008 to analyze water supply, traffic, and fiscal impacts, Landowner amended its application and the County initiated the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (the “Draft EIR”) in January 2009.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Initial Project Review. Lender’s Inspector shall have performed an Initial Project Review for construction of the MOB and Borrower shall have satisfied all requirements reasonably made by Lender’s Inspector as a result of such review.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Initial Project Review. In March 2007, the Napa County Board of Supervisors (the “Board”) received an initial application from Landowner for a General Plan amendment related to development of the Property. Following a series of City-County “study group” meetings in 2007-2008 to analyze water supply, traffic, and fiscal impacts, Landowner amended its application and the County initiated the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (the “Draft EIR”) in January 2009. D.2. County Housing Element. On June 23, 2009 (Resolution No. 09-88), the Board certified the County’s Housing Element Environmental Impact Report and adopted a General Plan amendment updating the Housing Element which identified the Property as a location for multifamily housing and contained the program to, among other things, rezone 20 acres of the Property to allow housing development at a minimum density of 20 dwelling units per acre (Housing Element Program H-4e). The Housing Element identified Program H-4e as 945 residential dwelling units with a state-required density bonus), up to 50,000 square feet of enclosed non-residential uses, one hotel with up to 150 suites and associated uses such as meeting space and spa, and a continuing care retirement and assisted living facility for seniors with up to 150 units (containing up to 225 beds). On the Eastern Parcel, outside of the Study Area, the GPA allows up to 319,000 gross square feet (“gsf”) of enclosed non-residential uses, including approximately 154,000 gsf of Membership Warehouse Store, 90,000 gsf of office use and 75,000 gsf of warehouse and R&D uses. As specified in Policy AG/LU-52 of the General Plan, the “Study Area” designation allows industrial uses to continue pursuant to existing zoning, but signals the need for further site- or area-specific planning to assess the potential for a mix of uses within the Study Area.
View Source
Initial Project Review. Prior to closing of the construction financing for the Project, the Advisor will perform a detailed construction cost review for the Project (an "Initial Project Review") which will include the scope of work, including the size of the Project, the unit size, unit mix and density of the Project, and the type of building, amenity package and parking spaces and will render an opinion regarding: (1) overall quality of the construction plans and specifications and an opinion as to whether the plans are sufficiently detailed for construction and conform to federal and state laws and codes applicable to the Project, including but not limited to building, health, fire, safety and handicapped access codes; (2) whether the level and quality of the construction/rehabilitation as detailed in the plans and specifications is adequate to maintain the use of the Project as affordable rental housing over the term of the Permanent Lender’s loan; (3) the general adequacy of the proposed construction documents and the level of quality of the specified materials, equipment, building components and systems; (4) availability of sewer, water, electric, telephone and gas utilities to the Project as represented by the Borrower, the Project architect or the Project surveyor; (5) review of all permits provided by the Borrower; (6) general compliance of the plans and specifications with the recommendations set forth in the geotechnical and structural reports, if any; and (7) general adequacy of the construction contract in its entirety, including all qualifications, assumptions and exhibits. Additionally, the Advisor will include with the analysis any additional comments or explanations that would reasonably be deemed relevant to the Initial Project Review.
View Source
Initial Project Review. In March 2007, the Napa County Board of Supervisors (the “Board”) received an initial application from Landowner for a General Plan amendment related to development of the Property. Following a series of City-County “study group” meetings in 2007-2008 to analyze water supply, traffic, and fiscal impacts, Landowner amended its application and the County initiated the preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (the “Draft EIR”) in January 2009. D.2. County Housing Element. On June 23, 2009 (Resolution No. 09-88), the Board certified the County’s Housing Element Environmental Impact Report and adopted a General Plan amendment updating the Housing Element which identified the Property as a location for multifamily housing and contained the program to, among other things, rezone 20 acres of the Property to allow housing development at a minimum density of 20 dwelling units per acre (Housing Element Program H-4e). The Housing Element identified Program H-4e as the likely first phase of a larger development, and required the County to rezone at least 20 acres of the Napa Pipe property, allowing at least 304 units (202 of them by right) to fulfill its Housing Element commitment.
View Source

Related to Initial Project Review

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Project Completion Report At the completion of construction and once a Project is placed in service, the Subrecipient must submit a Project Completion Report that includes the total number of units built and leased, affordable units built and leased, DR-MHP units built and leased, an accomplishment narrative, and the tenants names, demographics and income for each DR-MHP unit.

  • Agreement Review If, pursuant to section 25.10 (Review of Agreement) of the Bilateral Agreement, the Bilateral Agreement is reviewed after three or five years, or both, of the effective date of the Bilateral Agreement, and any changes to the Bilateral Agreement are required as a result, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as necessary and in a manner that is consistent with such changes.

  • Rent Review 3.1 If the reference base used to compile the Index shall change after today’s date the figure taken to be shown in the Index after the change shall be the figure which would have been shown in the Index if the reference base current at today’s date had been retained 3.2 If it becomes impossible by reason of any change after today’s date in the methods used to compile the Index or for any other reason whatever to calculate the revised Rent by reference to the Index or if any dispute or question whatever shall arise between the parties with respect to the amount of the revised Rent or the determination of the revised Rent such matter shall at the option of the Landlord be determined by an independent valuer to be appointed either by agreement between the parties or in the absence of agreement by the President for the time being of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (or his duly appointed deputy or any person authorised by him to make appointments on his behalf) on the application of either party who shall have full power to determine on such dates as he shall deem apposite what would have been the increase in the Index had it continued on the same basis and in view of the information assumed to be available for the operation of this rent review or (if that determination shall also be impossible) shall determine a reasonable revised Rent for the Property on such dates having regard to the purposes and intent of the provisions in this Lease for the review of the Rent 4 The Landlord shall give written notice to the Tenant of the amount of the revised Rent and thereafter memoranda (in such form as the Landlord shall reasonably require) recording the amount of the revised Rent shall be signed by or on behalf of the Landlord and the Tenant and annexed to this Lease and the Counterpart thereof and the parties shall bear their own costs of this procedure 5 If the new Rent payable on and from any Review Date has not been agreed by that Review Date Rent shall thereafter be payable at the rate in force immediately before the Review Date and forthwith upon the revised Rent being ascertained the Tenant shall pay to the Landlord an amount representing the difference (“the Shortfall”) between:- 5.1 the amount of the yearly Rent which would have been payable for the period from that Review Date until the next payment date following the date of ascertainment if the revised Rent had been ascertained at that Review Date and 5.2 together with interest at the rate of 2% below the Interest Rate on the Shortfall calculated on a day to day basis upon those parts of the Shortfall which would have been payable if the revised Rent had been ascertained at that Review Date

  • PROJECT WORK PLAN The Statement of Work is the formal document incorporated into the Grant. The Project Work Plan documents how the Grantee will achieve the performance measures outlined in the Grant. Changes to the Statement of Work require an amendment. Project Work Plans may be changed with written approval from DFPS and the Grantee.