Integration Test Sample Clauses

Integration Test. Lucent represents, warrants and covenants that (a) It is familiar with the intended use by WinStar of the Network as described in this Agreement and that the Network and its associated Deliverables are suitable for and will satisfy such use and the terms of this Agreement in all respects, including the Network Architecture and design and Product recommendations. (b) The Network, if implemented in accordance with the Network Architecture, is Supply Agreement Confidential - WinStar/Lucent designed to and will interface and interoperate in accordance with the Network Architecture, Applicable Standards and other corresponding Specifications in this Agreement as a fully integrated system. If the Network fails to so interface and interoperate during the Term of this Agreement, Lucent shall initiate corrective actions after receipt of notice of the defect or failure and shall promptly cure such defect at Lucent's sole cost and expense. This warranty shall not apply to the extent that (i) the Network is installed by a party other than Lucent not in accordance with the Network Architecture or (ii) such failure to operate directly results from a failure or defect in Lucent or Third-Party Products to operate in accordance with their specifications. This warranty shall not be deemed to extend or limit any warranty for any individual Product provided by Lucent.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Integration Test. VTBP is installed on the two nodes in the safety console, and the VTBP for the master node is installed in the separate system. To check the communications between the master node and the safety console is to send the signal from the master node. The master node has the VTBP programs that the user can edit the signal values for Digital Input/Output, and Analog Input/Output. The tests that conduct are 832 of the DIs, DOs, AIs, and AOs.The entire test was done by hand and there was abnormal behavior that found and fixed such as the pressing the switch was supposed to behave as sending the “on” signal but it was opposite as sending the “off” signal.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Integration Test. OptiMark will assist JOS ▇▇ scheduling and performing integration tests in a fully functional environment with production level system components. JOS ▇▇ responsible for the definition and execution of these tests.
View Source
Integration Test. The Seller shall integrate and test all hardware and software components for the Federal Interface Subsystem, Basic Photo Imaging System, the Intelligence Subsystem, the Missing Persons Subsystem, and the Additional Components (option). The Seller shall be responsible for the integration and test of all hardware and software in their facilities before shipping and delivery to the NYCPD facilities. The Seller shall conduct pre-Ready-to-Ship Reviews (PRSR) at the Seller's facilities to be witnessed by the Buyer prior to conducting a Ready-to-Ship Review. The Seller shall conduct Ready-to-Ship Reviews (RSRs) at the Seller's facilities to be witnessed by the Buyer and NYCPD prior to shipping to the NYCPD facilities.
View Source
Integration Test. If the modification involves multiple modules, it will be beneficial to test integrated components of the system to ensure that distinct functions involving more than one module meet specified requirements. Distinct sets of integrated components will be tested by members of the maintenance team. Test cases will be developed directly from the design specification.
View Source

Related to Integration Test

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

  • Performance Testing (a) All performance tests of the Project, including any Initial Performance Test required in Section 2 of Appendix VIII, will be performed in accordance with the test procedures set forth in Appendix VIII (“Performance Test”), including additional procedures and protocols related to Performance Testing as mutually agreed between Buyer and Seller (“Test Procedures”). Seller shall bear all costs and receive all revenues, if applicable, associated with all Performance Tests. (b) After the Initial Delivery Date and during the Delivery Term, Buyer will have the right to conduct a Performance Test (“Buyer Performance Test”) no more than once a calendar year to demonstrate whether the Project is capable of delivering the Distribution Services at the Contract Capacity. Within 30 calendar days following a Buyer Performance Test, Seller will have the right to retest the Project with a Performance Test (“Seller Retest”). For the avoidance of doubt, the results of any Seller Retest will supersede the results of the preceding Buyer Performance Test. (i) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at or above ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, the Contract Capacity will remain the Initial Contract Capacity; (ii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at more than or equal to eighty-five (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, but less than ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity (“Testing Band”), the Contract Capacity will be automatically adjusted (upwards or downwards) to the capacity commensurate with the amount of Distribution Services the Project delivered during the Performance Test within the Testing Band. (iii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is not capable of delivering Distribution Services of at least eighty-five percent (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, an Event of Default shall occur in accordance with Section 7.1(a)(viii).

  • Stability Testing Patheon will conduct stability testing on the Products in accordance with the protocols set out in the Specifications for the separate fees and during the time periods set out in Schedule C. Patheon will not make any changes to these testing protocols without prior written approval from Client. If a confirmed stability test failure occurs, Patheon will notify Client within [***], after which Patheon and Client will jointly determine the proceedings and methods to be undertaken to investigate the cause of the failure, including which party will bear the cost of the investigation. Patheon will not be liable for these costs unless it has failed to perform the Manufacturing Services in accordance with the Specifications and cGMPs. Patheon will give Client all stability test data and results at Client’s request.

  • Laboratory Testing All laboratories selected by UPS Freight for analyzing Controlled Substances Testing will be HHS certified.

  • Performance Tests Contractor shall perform Performance Tests in accordance with Section 11.2 of the Agreement and Attachment S.