Itemized Budget and Justification Sample Clauses
The Itemized Budget and Justification clause requires the party seeking funds or reimbursement to provide a detailed breakdown of projected expenses, along with explanations for each cost. This typically involves listing specific budget categories such as personnel, equipment, travel, and supplies, and justifying the necessity and reasonableness of each item in relation to the project’s objectives. The core function of this clause is to ensure transparency and accountability in financial planning, enabling the reviewing party to assess the appropriateness of requested funds and prevent misuse or over-allocation of resources.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Itemized Budget and Justification. Provide an itemized budget with appropriate justification. If applicable, include any indirect cost paid under the contract and the indirect cost rate used.
Itemized Budget and Justification. If the above information is unknown for any contractor at the time the application is submitted, the information may be submitted at a later date as a revision to the budget. Copies of the actual contracts should not be sent to HHS, unless specifically requested. In the body of the budget request, a summary should be provided of the proposed contracts and amounts for each.
Itemized Budget and Justification. Provide an itemized budget with appropriate justification. If applicable, include any indirect cost paid under the contract and the indirect cost rate used. If the above information is unknown for any contractor at the time the application is submitted, the information may be submitted at a later date as a revision to the budget. Copies of the actual contracts should not be sent to HHS, unless specifically requested. In the Budget Narrative, a summary should be provided of the proposed contracts, the work to be completed, and amounts for each. Recipient must not incur costs for contractual activities until the aforementioned information is provided for each contract and CMS approval obtained.
Itemized Budget and Justification. If this information is unknown at the time the application is submitted, the information may be submitted at a later date as a revision to the budget. In the Budget Narrative, a summary should be provided of the proposed subawards (subrecipients), the work to be completed, and amounts for each. Recipient must not incur costs for subrecipient activities until the aforementioned information is provided for each subrecipient and CMS approval obtained.
Itemized Budget and Justification. Provide an itemized budget with appropriate justification. If applicable, include any indirect cost paid under the contract and the indirect cost rate used. If the above information is unknown for any contractor at the time the application is submitted, the information may be submitted at a later date as a revision to the budget. Copies of the actual contracts should not be sent to HHS, unless specifically requested. In the body of the budget request, a summary should be provided of the proposed contracts and amounts for each.
Itemized Budget and Justification. The following table summarizes the estimated costs for grant management services (The Balmoral Group; 236 hours), legal services (▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 140 hours total), and fiscal agent services (3 basis points of total transactions). Note: only a portion of the total contractual costs for The Balmoral Group and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ are for pre-award efforts for grant application development: 30 hours for The Balmoral Group ($5,100) and 6 hours for ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ($1,500). The grant management effort was estimated based on The Balmoral Group’s time spent on other similar projects, including management of the Stand-up State Expenditure Plan project funded by RESTORE Council. The legal effort was estimated by ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ based on their efforts for other legal review and development of agreements.
Itemized Budget and Justification. The amount of Bucket 3 funds requested here is $5,000,000 for construction of stormwater conveyance improvements and storage enhancements. The remaining $2,005,063 for construction costs will be from co-funding committed by the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD). The costs are estimated based on Pasco County’s engineering consultants’ Opinion of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) from 60% plans and is considered reasonable based on the effort/scope and total cost amounts. Costs are summarized in Table 1. Environmental Testing and Monitoring includes rigorous site sampling, analyses, and other related work that is to be performed prior to and during construction for the soil management plan required under Chapter 62-780 F.A.C. The substantial excavation costs are justified as this project is building ponds and wetland storage, which involves mostly excavation. All construction and excavation will occur on lands owned by Pasco County or within County right- of-way (ROW) or easements. Plans and permits will confirm project limits and ROW. 30 years is the estimated useful life of the storage and conveyance improvements. Table 1. Subrecipient costs. Conveyance Improvement Project Elements Project Element Total ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ N $485,175 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ $207,415 509,510 Autumn Ln $505,883 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ $285,811 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ $238,029 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ $273,962 517,518 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ to Raintree $658,382 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇ ▇ $282,251 Conveyance Improvement Project Total $2,936,908 Regional Storage/Wetland Facility Project Elements Project Element Total Excavation and Soil Management Costs $3,568,155 Environmental Testing and Monitoring $500,000 Regional Storage Facility Project Total $4,068,155 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: $7,005,063 TOTAL SUBRECIPIENT COST: $5,000,000 (Bucket 3 funds) Co-funding (SWFWMD costs): $2,005,063 7. NICRA—NA
Itemized Budget and Justification. The following table summarizes the estimated costs for grant management services (The Balmoral Group; 250 hours total), legal services (▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 180 hours total), and fiscal agent services (3 basis points on total costs). Fiscal agent services are budgeted at the rate agreed to between The Gulf Consortium and ▇▇▇▇ County of 3 basis points of total disbursements. Note: only a portion of the total contractual costs for The Balmoral Group and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ are for pre-award efforts for grant application development: 50 hours for The Balmoral Group ($8,750) and 6 hours for ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ($1,500).
Itemized Budget and Justification. Please review Appendix G “Guidance for Preparing a Budget Request and Narrative in Response to SF424A” in the Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) for further guidance on what is required to address these topics areas.
Itemized Budget and Justification. The following table summarizes the estimated costs for grant management services (The Balmoral Group; 36 hour/yr), legal services (▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇; 14 hours/yr), and fiscal agent services (▇▇▇▇ County; 3 basis points). Organization Description Unit Cost Quantity or Rate (total) Pre-Award Costs? The Balmoral Group Grant management, oversight, reporting $170/hr 292 hours $49,640 ☒ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ & ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Subrecipient agreements and legal services $250/hr 80 hours $20,000 ☒ ▇▇▇▇ County Clerk Fiscal agent services 3 basis points % of total disbursements $257 ☐ Total $69,897