Major Plan Update Conformity Submittal Protocol Clause Samples

Major Plan Update Conformity Submittal Protocol. 1. The KRTPO will develop a single conformity determination for the entire affected area to support major updates to both the Knoxville Regional TPO and the LAMTPO Long Range Transportation Plans and Transportation Improvement Programs as well as TDOT’s Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). 2. The Executive Boards of both the KRTPO and LAMTPO will each formally adopt the regional conformity determination as part of the full Plan/TIP adoption. 3. The TPO will submit the adopted conformity determination first to TDOT for its review/concurrence. 4. Subsequent to its review, TDOT will submit the final conformity determination to the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration for their review and approval (conformity finding) with concurrence from EPA. 5. The LAMTPO will include the ozone conformity determination documentation within their transportation plans as an appendix.
View Source

Related to Major Plan Update Conformity Submittal Protocol

  • Contractor Selection Justification Form Customers shall complete this Contractor Selection Justification Form for each candidate selected and attach all completed forms to the purchase order. Date: Contractor’s Name: _ Contractor’s Contact Information: Address: _ Phone: _ Email: Candidate’s Name: _ Date Candidate will be available: _ Hourly rate of candidate: $ Position candidate recommended for: _ Justification for selection of candidate: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Agency: Division/Section/Unit: _ Printed Name: _ Title: _ Signature _ Date: Contractor's Name: Quarter: Purchase Order (PO) Number: PO Total $ Amount: PO Starting Date Ending Date Please review the attached Rating Definitions and provide your opinion by rating the following:

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures. 2. Each Party shall seek to enhance the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures conducted in the territories of other Parties with a view to increasing efficiency, avoiding duplication and ensuring cost effectiveness of the conformity assessments. In this regard, each Party may choose, depending on the situation of the Party and the specific sectors involved, a broad range of approaches. These may include but are not limited to: (a) recognition by a Party of the results of conformity assessments performed in the territory of another Party; (b) recognition of co-operative arrangements between accreditation bodies in the territories of the Parties; (c) mutual recognition of conformity assessment procedures conducted by bodies located in the territory of each Party; (d) accreditation of conformity assessment bodies in the territory of another Party; (e) use of existing regional and international multilateral recognition agreements and arrangements; (f) designating conformity assessment bodies located in the territory of another Party to perform conformity assessment; and (g) suppliers’ declaration of conformity. 3. Each Party shall exchange information with other Parties on its experience in the development and application of the approaches in Paragraph 2(a) to (g) and other appropriate approaches with a view to facilitating the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures. 4. A Party shall, upon request of another Party, explain its reasons for not accepting the results of any conformity assessment procedure performed in the territory of that other Party.

  • Escrow Format Specification Deposit’s Format. Registry objects, such as domains, contacts, name servers, registrars, etc. will be compiled into a file constructed as described in draft-▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-registry-data-escrow, see Part A, Section 9, reference 1 of this Specification and draft-▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-dnrd-objects-mapping, see Part A, Section 9, reference 2 of this Specification (collectively, the “DNDE Specification”). The DNDE Specification describes some elements as optional; Registry Operator will include those elements in the Deposits if they are available. If not already an RFC, Registry Operator will use the most recent draft version of the DNDE Specification available at the Effective Date. Registry Operator may at its election use newer versions of the DNDE Specification after the Effective Date. Once the DNDE Specification is published as an RFC, Registry Operator will implement that version of the DNDE Specification, no later than one hundred eighty (180) calendar days after. UTF-8 character encoding will be used.

  • ODUF Packing Specifications 6.3.1 A pack will contain a minimum of one message record or a maximum of 99,999 message records plus a pack header record and a pack trailer record. One transmission can contain a maximum of 99 packs and a minimum of one pack.

  • Progress Update Information included with the annual Data Access Request (DAR) renewal or Closeout summarizing the analysis of controlled-access datasets obtained through the DAR and any publications and presentations derived from the work.