Procedural Clause Samples
A Procedural clause outlines the specific steps, methods, or processes that parties must follow to carry out certain actions under an agreement. This may include requirements for submitting notices, timelines for performance, or the sequence of actions to be taken in the event of a dispute. By clearly defining these procedures, the clause ensures that all parties understand their obligations and the correct way to proceed, thereby reducing confusion and minimizing the risk of disputes arising from misunderstandings about process.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Procedural. Within six (6) months after completion of the Survey, ADOC will have implemented all policies, procedures, and/or Standard Operating Procedures to remove barriers identified in the Survey for all instances in which physical remediation is not contemplated.
C. Nothing herein prevents ADOC from making modifications or improvements to its existing prison or work release facilities in order to bring such facilities or any parts of such facilities into compliance with the architectural requirements of the ADA. Likewise, nothing herein prevents ADOC from constructing entirely new prison or work release facilities so long as those facilities are complaint with the provisions of the Acts.
D. The Transition Plan will include the name of the official responsible for the plan's implementation.
E. ADOC will maintain a copy of the Transition Plan. Additionally, a copy of the Transition Plan same will be maintained at the law library of all ADOC facilities that maintain an inmate law library. ADOC is permitted to redact from any copy of the self- evaluation made available to the public or to Inmates any portion of the self-evaluation that could adversely impact safety or security concerns at ADOC facilities. However, unreacted copies of the Transition Plan will be provided, under seal, to the Court, the arbitrator, the monitor and Plaintiffs’ counsel.
Procedural. Gatekeeping is the programme of work associated with making a decision as to whether to commence an assessment in respect of a country, by reference to numerous policy factors reflecting HMG and UK interests.
Procedural. 3.1.1. I agree to cooperate with CD in accurately presenting my services and qualifications to the public at large in order to avoid confusion and misrepresentation, and to make every effort to ensure that public media identifies me correctly.
3.1.2. I agree that my annual license fee includes the license to represent myself as an “Accredited Caring Dads Professional”, “Accredited Caring Dads Facilitator in Training” or “Accredited Caring Dads Facilitator”, as well as my license to facilitate Caring Dads Group Programs, along with my access to the Pro-Portal and associated reporting functions.
3.1.3. I further agree that my status as an “Accredited Caring Dads Professional” is contingent upon paying annual license fees. Non-payment of fees results in immediate revoking of my license to represent myself as an “Accredited Caring Dads Professional”, “Accredited Caring Dads Facilitator in Training” or “Accredited Caring Dads Facilitator”, as well as my license to facilitate any Caring Dads Groups.
3.1.4. I agree that ongoing consultation, support, and additional training as deemed necessary by CD, is required so that I am always thoroughly trained in the CD model, and using the continually updated program manuals correctly. This ongoing follow-up consultation is required in order to address implementation issues, or to take into account unforeseen clinical realities that may be specific to my operational community (e.g. cultural diversity). I agree to attend one CD conference every 2 years in addition to the above. Conferences may be attended via webinar.
3.1.5. I agree to to sustain a model with high fidelity over time and participate actively in the Reporting & Quality Assurance system by submitting required reports for all Caring Dads groups as both an ongoing record of service provided, and to assure compliance with the CD model of service described below.
Procedural. The Joint Management Board will meet at least monthly The Quorum for the Joint Management Group shall be at least three representatives of the Local Authority (which shall include the Chair or such person as the Chair shall nominate to act as chair in his absence) and three representatives of the Trust. The Joint Management Board shall decide all other procedural arrangements under which it operates.
Procedural. Gatekeeping is the programme of work associated with making a decision as to whether to commence an assessment in respect of a country, by reference to numerous policy factors reflecting HMG and UK interests. • Assessment is the programme of work associated with collecting and analysing information relating to the level of data protection in another country. • Recommendation is the programme of work associated with the DCMS UK Adequacy Assessment team making a recommendation to the Secretary of State who will then decide whether to make a finding of adequacy and make UK Adequacy Regulations in respect of another country. • Procedural is the programme of work associated with making the relevant UK Adequacy Regulations, laying these in Parliament, and any subsequent publication of the ICO’s opinion. • The ICO’s role in relation to UK Adequacy Assessment Work – in line with its independent regulatory role and statutory responsibilities – includes: • During the Gatekeeping and Assessment phases in response to being engaged by officials in DCMS: providing comments and advice to DCMS officials, including via provision of relevant factual information that relate to a country’s data protection laws and practices (e.g. the role and effectiveness of the relevant country’s regulator); • During the Recommendation phase: providing a response on the draft conclusions of a DCMS assessment so that the Commissioner’s view can be included in the recommendation to the Secretary of State and factored into their decision making. In forming its view, the ICO will consider, inter alia, the features of a country’s data protection laws and practices in the round, recognising that different countries have different ways of ensuring adequate levels of data protection; and • During the Procedural phase: providing advice and/or an opinion to Parliament, including on the process followed and the factors taken into consideration by the DCMS Adequacy Assessment team and the Secretary of State. • The Parties agree, where appropriate, to provide assistance to each other, in light of their particular roles, as set out below: DCMS ICO Gatekeeping Share factual research Provide comments and and analysis relating to advice, including factual countries’ data protection information to supplement laws and practices. DCMS research and Share information on analysis, especially on which countries are being issues the ICO is well- considered as potential placed to comment on (e.g. candidates for futu...
Procedural. The discussions will take place in the style of a book club, where we’ll discuss set reading based around a few questions or discussion points provided in advance.
Procedural. CONSIDERATIONS
A. Data Sources:
1. Travel Demand Model – The KRTPO will maintain a validated travel demand forecasting model in order to project future vehicle miles of travel within the affected area for purposes of determining conformity of the transportation projects that are proposed. Furthermore, the KRTPO will be responsible for maintaining a travel demand forecasting model that includes the entire LAMTPO Metropolitan Planning Area. If, through the interagency consultation process, a project is determined to be regionally significant but not included in the model then appropriate off model data forecasting methodologies will be pursued.
Procedural improper use of an ICT system, access or privileges (e.g. inappropriate use of email or accessing inappropriate web sites); improper handling, distribution, accounting, storage and destruction of cryptographic items or sensitive information
Procedural. The provisions of this Agreement shall be effective as of July 1, 2013 and shall continue and remain in full force and effect to and including June 30, 2016.
Procedural. All meetings are open to the public. Please note that the meetings may close early if all business is finished. At the Chairs’ discretion, members of the public may make oral presentations during the meetings. If you would like to make an oral presentation at a meeting, please notify the Executive Director no later than April 10, 2002. Written material for distribution at a meeting should reach the Coast Guard no later than April 10, 2002. If you would like a copy of your material distributed to each member of the committee or subcommittee in advance of a meeting, please submit 25 copies to the Executive Director no later than April 10, 2002. For information on facilities or services for individuals With disabilities or to request special assistance at the meetings, contact the Executive Director as soon as possible. Dated: March 25, 2002. [FR Doc. 02–7829 Filed 4–1–02; 8:45 am] AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of dispositions of prior petitions. SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking provisions governing the application, processing, and disposition of petitions for exemption part 11 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this notice contains a summary of dispositions of certain petitions previously received. The purpose of this notice is to improve the public’s awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of FAA’s regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (202) 267–5174, Office of Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal Aviation Administration, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇., ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇. This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91. Issued in Washington, DC, on March 27, 2002.