Metrics and Targets Clause Samples

Metrics and Targets. System-Wide Metrics 2019-20 Target Institution-Specific Metrics 2019-20 Target
Metrics and Targets. MKS agrees to target the operational performance targets defined below. Performance targets for FY2000 are listed. Intermediate performance targets are established in the Supplier Performance Management Plan. The following defines how Applied and MKS will measure performance metrics: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FY 1999 End FY 2000 End Measure Definition Calculation Target Target ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quality ppm Number of quality Quantity of parts with discrepancies recorded DMR [**] [**] detected prior to occurrences provided shipping a completed by the supplier over system to an end the prior 13-week customer, expressed period, divided by the as parts per million total quantity of parts received from that supplier over the same period, multiplied by 1 million ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Supplier Fault DMRs Number of DMR Number of DMR [**] [**] transactions for part occurrences recorded quality discrepancies against the supplier detected in-house accumulated over the prior to system prior 13-week period installation in the field ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Confidential Materials omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Asterisks denote omissions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FY 1999 End FY 2000 End Measure Definition Calculation Target Target ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Late Delivery ppm Number of parts Quantity of parts delivered later than received one day or [**] [**] the agreed upon more after the commit commit date date, accumulated for each supplier over a rolling 13-week period, divided by the total quantity of parts received over the same period, multiplied by 1 million ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Early Delivery ppm Number of parts Quantity of parts received three or received three or more [**] [**] more days before the days before the commit date commit date, accumulated over a rolling 13-week period, divided by the total quantity of parts received over...
Metrics and Targets. Institutional Metrics Institutional Targets System-Wide Metrics (pre-determined by MAESD) Institutional Targets for System-Wide Metrics
Metrics and Targets. Advanced Energy agrees to perform to the following operational performance measures: quality, delivery, cost, manufacturing disruption occurrences, cycle time, and flexibility. Performance targets for FY2000 are listed. Intermediate performance targets are established in the Supplier Performance Management Plan. The following defines how Applied and Advanced Energy will measure performance metrics: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MEASURE DEFINITION CALCULATION 1998 TARGET 1999 TARGET 2000 TARGET -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Quality ppm* Number of quality Number of DMR 1750 ppm 750 ppm 400 ppm discrepancies detected occurrences recorded prior to shipping a for all parts provided completed system to an by the supplier end customer, accumulated over the expressed as parts per prior 13-week period, million divided by the total receipts for that part over the same period and multiplied by 1 million -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Field Failures Number of part quality Number of RMA 0 0 0 discrepancies detected occurrences recorded occurrences occurrences occurrences in the field during for each part installation or accumulated over the routine repair prior 13-week period -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Late Delivery ppm* Number of parts Number of parts 20,000 ppm 10,000 ppm 5000 ppm delivered later than received one day or with 0 ppm with 0 ppm with 0 ppm the agreed upon more after the LESS THAN LESS THAN LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO OR EQUAL TO OR EQUAL TO 4 days late 4 days late 4 days late -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Advanced Energy ______ Appled Materials _______ 13 of 16 Date ________
Metrics and Targets. Disclose the metrics and targets used to assess and manage relevant climate-related risks and opportunities where such information is material.

Related to Metrics and Targets

  • Targets Seller’s supplier diversity spending target for Work supporting the construction of the Project prior to the Commercial Operation Date is ____ percent (___%) as measured relative to Seller’s total expenditures on construction of the Project prior to the Commercial Operation Date, and;

  • Targets and Milestones For the purposes of this Access Agreement, the University of Bristol will assess progress in widening participation against a combination of progress measures which, between them, are designed to assess: • The specific impact of a number of key outreach initiatives. • Year on year progress in diversifying our applicant and student population. • Year on year progress in improving conversion of under-represented applicants. Bearing in mind the range of outreach activities which we plan to offer, we intend to measure year on year progress in attracting a wider pool of applicants by focusing particularly on each of the following categories (although additional measures included in our 2012 Agreement have also been retained for continuity of monitoring): • Applicants from low performing schools • Applicants from socio-economic groups 4-7 • Local applicants Progress measures for each of these are provided at Appendix Four. In each case, we have included new measures, to assess improvements in application to intake conversion. As far as possible, measures have been calculated taking account of the expected impact of a number of specific outreach initiatives (the Access to Bristol scheme, summer school programme and personal adviser scheme), each of which also has more detailed performance targets associated with them (also detailed at Appendix Four). Measurement of the University’s intake profile will be focused on the low school performance category, reflecting the role which this plays in our contextual approach to admissions. Measures relating to mature student intake have been included for continuity. The recent decision to grow our undergraduate numbers substantially means that continuing to measure progress in diversifying intake by looking at under-represented groups as a percentage of total intake is no longer meaningful. For each intake-related measure, we have therefore added the number of students which the original percentages might have been expected to deliver. Monitoring against these numbers will give a more accurate picture of progress. All progress measures have been informed by more detailed analysis of progress against the institutional milestones detailed in Appendix Two and will be re-calculated annually to reflect assessment of our progress to date. In addition, it should be noted that we intend to carry out further research, for example, to better understand the impact of educational standards in the Bristol area on our ability to progress at the specified rates; we may need to adjust the progress measures contained in this agreement for future years to reflect the findings.

  • Multi-year Planning Targets Schedule A may reflect an allocation for the first Funding Year of this Agreement as well as planning targets for up to two additional years, consistent with the term of this Agreement. In such an event, the HSP acknowledges that if it is provided with planning targets, these targets: a. are targets only, b. are provided solely for the purposes of planning, c. are subject to confirmation, and d. may be changed at the discretion of the Funder in consultation with the HSP. The HSP will proactively manage the risks associated with multi-year planning and the potential changes to the planning targets; and the Funder agrees that it will communicate any changes to the planning targets as soon as reasonably possible.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Metrics Institutional Metrics System-Wide Metrics