Model 1: exposure to spray drift Clause Samples

Model 1: exposure to spray drift boom spraying‌ An example calculation, based on the case study used in the CRD Guidance (Chemicals Regulation Directorate), summarised in Table 11, is shown in Figure 5. Single application with a test product Dermal absorption = 17% Concentration of a.s. in product = 125 g/l Inhalation absorption =100% Applied dose = 1 L product per ha Oral absorption = 100% A distribution of outputs is calculated, and a number of different centiles of the distributions can be selected by the user. The relative importance of each component of exposure is shown in Figure 5 for median values, and it can be seen that dermal exposure for this scenario was the largest for both acute and longer term exposures. Direct dermal exposure is greatest for acute exposure, and indirect dermal exposure is greatest for longer-term, as it is repeated daily. Table 12 shows the median, 75th and 95th percentile of the output distribution for exposures, compared with the CRD case study. (Note that this case study used double the applied dose to determine the indirect exposures, shown in the lower half of the table for a child only, and we have therefore halved the CRD figures for comparison). It can be seen that the BROWSE model acute exposure distribution has a median that is similar to the existing CRD exposure assessment for direct dermal exposure, but the 95th percentile (recommended by EFSA for acute exposure calculations) is significantly higher. Spray inhalation exposure is lower in the BROWSE model, however, because the CRD model uses the limit of detection of experimental data, whereas BROWSE attempts a realistic estimate. The BROWSE indirect exposure calculation shows a greater longer-term exposure than the acute exposure, which is counter-intuitive. For indirect exposure, it is assumed that (a) the exposure occurs daily, and in this case study, the half life of the pesticide on the turf is 30 d so there is little decay over the 7 d exposure period, leading to a similar exposure to that for the acute calculation; and (b) there are two neighbouring fields that have contributed to the exposure, rather than a single field that is used for the acute calculation. Indirect dermal exposure is higher in the BROWSE model than the CRD calculation, largely because a more realistic estimate of ground deposits are used by BROWSE and because there has been a revision in the default values for input parameters, compared with those used by CRD. Indirect ingestion exposure is similar to the CRD calcula...
View Source

Related to Model 1: exposure to spray drift

  • Reallocation to a Class with a Lower Salary Range Maximum 1. If the employee meets the skills and abilities requirements of the position and chooses to remain in the reallocated position, the employee retains the existing appointment status and has the right to be placed on the Employer’s internal layoff list for the classification occupied prior to the reallocation. 2. If the employee chooses to vacate the position or does not meet the skills and abilities requirements of the position, the layoff procedure specified in Article 31 of this Agreement applies.

  • Reallocation of Applicable Revolving Percentages to Reduce Fronting Exposure All or any part of such Defaulting Lender’s participation in L/C Obligations and Swingline Loans shall be reallocated among the Non-Defaulting Lenders in accordance with their respective Applicable Revolving Percentages (calculated without regard to such Defaulting Lender’s Commitment) but only to the extent that such reallocation does not cause the aggregate Revolving Exposure of any Non-Defaulting Lender to exceed such Non-Defaulting Lender’s Revolving Commitment. Subject to Section 11.20, no reallocation hereunder shall constitute a waiver or release of any claim of any party hereunder against a Defaulting Lender arising from that Lender having become a Defaulting Lender, including any claim of a Non-Defaulting Lender as a result of such Non-Defaulting Lender’s increased exposure following such reallocation.

  • Availability of Earnings Statements The Company shall make generally available to holders of its securities as soon as may be practicable but in no event later than the last day of the fifteenth (15th) full calendar month following the calendar quarter in which the most recent effective date occurs in accordance with Rule 158 of the Rules and Regulations, an earnings statement (which need not be audited but shall be in reasonable detail) for a period of twelve (12) months ended commencing after the effective date, and satisfying the provisions of Section 11(a) of the Act (including Rule 158 of the Rules and Regulations).

  • Reallocation of Pro Rata Share to Reduce Fronting Exposure During any period in which any Revolving Credit Lender is a Defaulting Lender, for purposes of computing the amount of the obligation of each Revolving Credit Lender that is a Non-Defaulting Lender to acquire, refinance or fund participations in Letters of Credit or Swing Line Loans pursuant to Section 2.03, the “Pro Rata Share” of each Non-Defaulting Lender’s Revolving Credit Loans and L/C Obligations shall be computed without giving effect to the Revolving Credit Commitment of that Defaulting Lender; provided that (i) each such reallocation shall be given effect only if, at the date the applicable Revolving Credit Lender becomes a Defaulting Lender, no Default or Event of Default has occurred and is continuing; and (ii) the aggregate obligation of each Non-Defaulting Lender to acquire, refinance or fund participations in Letters of Credit and Swing Line Loans shall not exceed the positive difference, if any, of (1) the Revolving Credit Commitment of that Non-Defaulting Lender minus (2) the aggregate Outstanding Amount of the Revolving Credit Loans of that Non-Defaulting Lender. No reallocation hereunder shall constitute a waiver or release of any claim of any party hereunder against a Defaulting Lender arising from that Lender having become a Defaulting Lender, including any claim of a Non-Defaulting Lender as a result of such Non-Defaulting Lender’s increased exposure following such reallocation. If the allocation described in this clause (iv) cannot, or can only partially, be effected, the Borrower shall, without prejudice to any right or remedy available to it hereunder or under law, (x) first, prepay Swing Line Loans in an amount equal to the Swing Line Lenders’ Fronting Exposure and (y) second, Cash Collateralize the L/C Issuers’ Fronting Exposure in accordance with the procedures satisfactory to such L/C Issuer (in its sole discretion).

  • Amount of Funds Available to Grantee The maximum amount of funding being made available to Grantee under this Agreement is: $20,000. This amount may be amended, subject to funds availability, by mutual consent of the parties. Grant funds under this Agreement may be considered taxable income.