Common use of Moving Forward Clause in Contracts

Moving Forward. ▇▇▇▇▇’ work has major implications for the study of inaugurated resurrection. Although his focus was not first and foremost resurrection, he offers a fruitful way forward in the study of inaugurated resurrection in early Christianity. In many ways, this present study builds upon his thesis, particularly his emphasis on the way that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 36–37 played a key role in influencing ▇▇▇▇’s understanding of the Spirit. As noted above, the battleground for demonstrating that ▇▇▇▇ did or did not believe in inaugurated resurrection is usually Romans 6.1–14, since it is the only passage in the undisputed ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ letters that seems to explicitly describe rising with ▇▇▇▇▇▇ in the present, though it has also been interpreted to refute such a notion, as we 93 Ibid., 159 note 2. 94 Ibid., 162 emphasis in original. have seen. The challenge for interpreters is to show that Romans 6.1–14 does in fact describe or imply inaugurated resurrection. However, we have also noted above that scholarship is at something of an exegetical impasse on the issue, with some confidently proclaiming that Romans 6 does imply present resurrection and others claiming with equal confidence that it clearly does not. Fresh exegesis is clearly required, but we cannot simply rehash the arguments of previous scholars.