Moving Forward Clause Samples
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 3 times
Moving Forward. ▇▇▇▇▇’ work has major implications for the study of inaugurated resurrection. Although his focus was not first and foremost resurrection, he offers a fruitful way forward in the study of inaugurated resurrection in early Christianity. In many ways, this present study builds upon his thesis, particularly his emphasis on the way that ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 36–37 played a key role in influencing ▇▇▇▇’s understanding of the Spirit. As noted above, the battleground for demonstrating that ▇▇▇▇ did or did not believe in inaugurated resurrection is usually Romans 6.1–14, since it is the only passage in the undisputed ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ letters that seems to explicitly describe rising with ▇▇▇▇▇▇ in the present, though it has also been interpreted to refute such a notion, as we 93 Ibid., 159 note 2. 94 Ibid., 162 emphasis in original. have seen. The challenge for interpreters is to show that Romans 6.1–14 does in fact describe or imply inaugurated resurrection. However, we have also noted above that scholarship is at something of an exegetical impasse on the issue, with some confidently proclaiming that Romans 6 does imply present resurrection and others claiming with equal confidence that it clearly does not. Fresh exegesis is clearly required, but we cannot simply rehash the arguments of previous scholars.
Moving Forward. To the extent the parties have other specific changes that they wish to make to the contract, they can be set forth on separate pages, which is the practice for other trading contracts. If market practice demonstrates widespread adoption of certain changes, the working group will examine whether to revise the contract accordingly. This is a dynamic contract, for a dynamic market. We fully expect the market to rapidly develop beyond the contract as currently written, but hope to set forth what parties should keep in mind when they seek to transact in RECs, while at the same time providing a functioning document that enables parties to transact in RECs right now. The drafters recognize that this market is nascent and we hope it will mature on our watch into a robust market mechanism to allocate resources to achieve the goals of renewable resource development.
Moving Forward. The Parties agree in principle to move forward to: • establish a Cooperative System reflecting the principles set out in this Agreement; • use their best efforts to cause their respective legislatures to enact or approve the legislation, legislative amendments or regulations necessary to implement the Cooperative System; and • enter into all agreements and take all actions necessary to give effect to this Agreement including an agreement for the integration of a capital markets regulatory body or function of a provincial Participating Jurisdiction with an integrated financial regulatory/consumer protection authority that would contemplate: • a services agreement for the interim provision of services (which will include the full secondment to the CMR of authority employees involved in capital markets regulation) on a cost-recovery basis by the integrated financial regulatory/consumer protection authority in the provincial Participating Jurisdiction to the CMR to assist in administering the Cooperative Legislation and delivering capital markets regulatory services within national standards in the provincial Participating Jurisdiction for a period of three years commencing on the operational launch date of the CMR. Employees of an integrated financial regulatory consumer protection authority who are seconded to the CMR and are delivering on behalf of the CMR capital markets regulatory services pursuant to the services agreement shall be identified as working on behalf of the CMR, shall work in premises identified with the CMR and shall be under the sole control and direction of the CMR on all matters relating to capital markets regulation under, and the interpretation and application of, the Cooperative Legislation and shall be fully accountable to the CMR with respect to all such activities. The CMR may audit costs and monitor service levels for all services provided pursuant to the services agreement; and • an agreement being reached no later than one year prior to the expiry date of the services agreement setting forth the terms of the staged transfer and/or assignment of all employees, assets and contracts of the integrated financial regulatory/consumer protection authority involved in or relating to capital markets regulation in the provincial Participating Jurisdiction to the CMR on the basis of certain stipulated benchmarks to be agreed to with all such transfers and/or assignments being completed by the expiry date of the services agreement.
Moving Forward. SSI and its Subsidiaries agree to use their commercially reasonable efforts to allow moving forward any scheduled delivery of Co-branded Product as may be reasonably necessary to meet the needs of any Distributor or End User or its Subsidiaries. In the event that StorageTek or any of its Subsidiaries requests expedited delivery, SSI or its Subsidiaries shall use reasonable efforts to accommodate such request and advise StorageTek or its Subsidiaries whether SSI or its Subsidiaries can accept the Contract in the time requested and of any additional costs associated with expedited delivery. If StorageTek or its Subsidiaries accepts such additional costs, in writing, then SSI or its Subsidiaries shall use commercially reasonable efforts to deliver the Co-branded Products in the expedited time requested, and StorageTek or its Subsidiaries shall pay for such expedited products at their price plus the agreed to additional costs of expediting.
Moving Forward. The Parties agree in principle to move forward to: establish a Cooperative System reflecting the principles set out in this Agreement; use their best efforts to cause their respective legislatures to enact or approve the legislation, legislative amendments or regulations necessary to implement the Cooperative System; and enter into all agreements and take all actions necessary to give effect to this Agreement.
Moving Forward. EU-JORDAN TRADE AGREEMENT AS PART OF THE JORDAN COMPACT
Moving Forward. The adage, “If you’re not part of the solution, you’re part of the problem,” is a phrase that characterizes the philosophy that underlies this work. The current climate of contention benefits no one. It simply must change in order for there to be progress. Whether the plan will be successful is an unknown, but rather than taking the same tried path and slamming into a brick wall again, industry and community are invited to move beyond the limitations of what they think is possible in order to create the future they envision.
Moving Forward ten ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ systematic investigation of the concentration-exposure duration response relationships of extremely hazardous airborne substances provided insight on chemical characteristics that have demonstrated great utility in the development of hazard assessments and safety analysis plans for emergency responses. However, the statistical power of ten ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ study is low and implementing AEGL default values based on percentiles of only 20 chemicals may be risky. The international growth of newly synthesized and isolated chemicals is high. In fact, data from the CAS Statistical Summary from 1907-2007 indicates an exponential increase in registered chemicals over that time period (ACS, 2008; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2008). Furthermore, the U.S. EPA’s Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Chemical Substance Inventory currently contains more than 84,000 chemical substances and the agency receives between 500 and 1,000 new “Notices of Commencement of Manufacture or Import” (NOCs) each year (U.S. EPA, “TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory”). It is without question that within this growth of new chemicals contains substances that could cause toxic effects after acute inhalation exposure, and therefore call for chemical-specific AEGL value development. The discontinuation of the AEGL Committee’s involvement in the AEGL program may limit the validity of these newly derived AEGL values. Moreover, substantial uncertainty may be present in future AEGL values as a result of limited relevant empirical studies to identify chemical-specific concentration-exposure duration relationships. Therefore, default values adopted by U.S. EPA’s AEGL program may be of significant importance in the future. It has been nearly 30 years since ten ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ 1986 publication in which the distribution of TLEs was first explored. The AEGL database contains large source of rich expert-validated chemical-specific information about temporal extrapolation. Surprisingly, no statistical assessments have been performed on AEGL Committee approved TLEs in the AEGL database. Additionally, open access journals and journal archives provide a wealth of information on empirical studies that can be compiled in a similar fashion to ten ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ study to complement temporal extrapolation characteristics found in the AEGL database. These untouched resources could be used to build on ten ▇▇▇▇▇’▇ contribution to inhalation risk assessment by providing additional information on concentration-exposure duration relationships that may re...
Moving Forward. The goals, proposed strategies, and responsibilities of each organization outlined below are designed to advance the shared goals of NAGP and NAFA. To this end, NAGP and NAFA will remain in reliable and expedient contact with each other as relevant conservation issues arise. Similarly, both organizations will strategize ways in which to protect and advance conservation policies at the state and federal level.
Moving Forward. To avoid an arbitrary application of the international standard, nations must cooperate in utilizing SPS measurements, in order to flourish the global economy as well as the domestic economy. In addition, the SPS Agreement needs to be applied equally between countries to prevent discrimination and income inequality that cause excessive challenges between countries. If a country claims that an animal, and therefore the animal products, are affected by climate change, but the country lacks SPS measurements, and the animal products threaten the health of their citizens, they have to be clear to articulate the reasons or refer the case to the WTO dispute settlement. There, the WTO may scrutinize the claim and make final decisions whether or not the affected animal products impose a massive threat to their citizens in terms of health otherwise the decision would be unjustifiable and arbitrary. Additionally, besides the WHO recommendations regarding animal productions, countries should take into consideration how climate change affects animals’ physiology, distribution and adaptation. The reasons for prohibiting animal products from any country or region must be reasonable and scientific, otherwise, it will be unreasonable and discriminatory. After studying the above cases objectively, I can say that the SPS Agreement needs to be addressed globally to reach out to monolithic standard that all nations can rely on when they decide to import agriculture products from other nation, otherwise the application of the SPS will continue to be disputed unabated. Countries need to restrict the import of agricultural products through the development of SPS measures to ensure that they are free from such dangers.78 The SPS Agreement sets out various principles that strive to exclude discriminatory and unreasonable 78 Id. measures that risk becoming a protectionist tool.79 The SPS Agreement requires that SPS measures depend on logical standards and scientific measures.80 However, the measures should be encouraged to be a framework for international standards of “harmonization”81 As a result of the arbitrary application of the SPS, developed countries could raise their income and become richer. In addition to that they could carve out a strong infrastructure that could adopt any changes that result from climate change. Climate change’s impact the prices of the international food, rice production, and maize production.82 The first chart83 shows the impact on international food ...