Nonstandard Design Features Clause Samples

The Nonstandard Design Features clause defines how unique or atypical design elements, which deviate from standard industry practices, are addressed within a project. It typically requires that any such features be clearly identified, reviewed, and approved by relevant parties before implementation, and may outline additional responsibilities or documentation requirements for these elements. This clause ensures that all stakeholders are aware of and agree to the risks, costs, or maintenance implications associated with nonstandard features, thereby reducing misunderstandings and potential disputes during or after the project.
Nonstandard Design Features. A Design Standard Decision Document was approved on October 2nd, 2020. The proposed project requires the following nonstandard design features: HDM Section 304.1 titled Side Slope Standards states “In light grading where normal slopes catch in distance less than 18 feet from the edge of the shoulder, a uniform catch point, at least 18 feet from the edge of the shoulder, should be used.” Uniform grading standard is meant for construction production efficiencies for larger production projects. This standard does not address safety or the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) 10 controlling criteria and will not be classified in the same category because of the proposed nature of improvements.
Nonstandard Design Features. The project does not propose to change any geometric features. According to Design Information Bulletin 81-02, a Design Standard Decision Document or Memo to File is not required. Per DIB-81-02, Table 5-1 lists the nonstandard design features to remain under the Build Alternative. The table also lists the relevant design standards and the justification for keeping the nonstandard features unchanged. Build Alternative HDM Index 301.1 (Lane Standard Width) Lane width is less than 12 feet. The nonstandard lane width originated from the existing roadway cross sections and will remain. Build Alternative HDM Index 302.1 (Shoulder Standard width) Shoulder width is less than 10 feet for the mainline and less than 8 feet for ramps. The nonstandard shoulder width originated from the existing roadway cross sections and will remain. Build Alternative HDM Index 304 (Side Slopes of 4:1 or Flatter) Side slopes are steeper than 4:1. The nonstandard side slopes originated from the existing roadway cross sections and will remain. Build Alternative HDM Index 305.1 (Median Standard Width) Median width is less than 36 feet from PM 0.0 to PM 9.0. The nonstandard median width originated from the existing roadway cross sections and will remain. Notes: HDM = Highway Design Manual PM = post mile The project does not involve interim features. High-Occupancy Vehicle Lanes The project is not proposing HOV lanes.
Nonstandard Design Features. The project proposes to maintain the existing nonstandard features. The approval date for the Existing Features to Remain: Memo to File is August 23, 2020. The details of the nonstandard features to remain are discussed below. The existing posted speed for the corridor is 65 miles per hour (mph), and the project will maintain this existing speed. The design speed for freeways in urban areas varies from 55 mph to 80 mph. The design speed for the project is 70 mph. The existing horizontal and vertical curves along I-80 within the project limits provide stopping sight distances that vary from 311 feet to greater than 750 feet (40 mph to 70 mph), and the project will maintain the existing vertical curve sight distances. Nonstandard median widths of 6 feet to 12 feet are proposed between “WB3” Station (Sta.) 296+00 and “WB6” Sta. 1125+00, where the project conforms to existing conditions. Table 5-1 lists the existing and proposed median widths within the project limits. P12 to P27 "WB4" 548+00 to "WB5" 756+00 6 6 P30 to P41 "WB5" 791+00 to "AM4" 954+00 6 6 P41 to P54 "AM4" 954+00 to "WB6" 1122+00 12 12 * “Page Number” refers to the layout page number; see Attachment C.
Nonstandard Design Features. Exceptions from the Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM) design standards have been identified for the preferred alternative and it was determined there one bold face design standard and two underlined design standards required written approval. The Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD) was approved on February 9, 2021. The approved cover sheet for the DSDD is provided in Attachment L. The following table summarizes the approved nonstandard design features for the recommended preferred alternative. 501.3 Local Interchange Spacing to Freeway-to- Freeway Connectors 3 miles The existing nonstandard interchange spacing of 2.15 miles is being maintained to avoid excessive cost, environmental impacts, and opposition from the local agency to close adjacent interchanges. The length between the International Parkway interchange and I- 580/I-205 interchange to the north is an existing condition with a formally executed freeway agreement. 304.1 Embankment Side Slope 4:1 This nonstandard feature of a 2:1 side slope is to avoid excessive cost to acquire additional right-of-way from an adjacent private property with agriculture land use in the northeast quadrant of the interchange. The existing WB I-580 direct off-ramp proposed to be removed and replaced with the new realigned direct off-ramp has existing nonstandard side slopes steeper than 4:1 in a similar location to the new off-ramp with guard railing systems.
Nonstandard Design Features. The geometrics of the existing and proposed facility will be checked for nonstandard features and a list of mandatory and advisory design exceptions will be identified and submitted to Caltrans for review and comments. GHD assumes that there will be four (4) design exceptions. Geometric refinements will be investigated to assess if any nonstandard features can be eliminated and agree on the advisory and mandatory design exceptions to be requested during the PA&ED Phase. Draft and final versions of advisory and mandatory fact sheets will be submitted to obtain geometrical concurrence from Caltrans.
Nonstandard Design Features. Exceptions from the Caltrans Highway Design Manual (HDM) design standards have been identified for the preferred alternative and it was determined there one bold face design standard and two underlined design standards required written approval. The Design Standard Decision Document (DSDD) was approved on February 9, 2021. The approved cover sheet for the DSDD is provided in Attachment L. The following table summarizes the approved nonstandard design features for the recommended preferred alternative. 501.3 Local Interchange Spacing to Freeway-to- Freeway Connectors 3 miles The existing nonstandard interchange spacing of 2.15 miles is being maintained to avoid excessive cost, environmental impacts, and opposition from the local agency to close adjacent interchanges. The length between the International Parkway interchange and I- 580/I-205 interchange to the north is an existing condition with a formally executed freeway agreement. 304.1 Embankment Side Slope 4:1 This nonstandard feature of a 2:1 side slope is to avoid excessive cost to acquire additional right-of-way from an adjacent private property with agriculture land use in the northeast quadrant of the interchange. The existing WB I-580 direct off-ramp proposed to be removed and replaced with the new realigned direct off-ramp has existing nonstandard side slopes steeper than 4:1 in a similar location to the new off-ramp with guard railing systems. 504.8 Access Rights along Interchange Ramps to their Junction with the Nearest Public Road 300 ft (Rural Area) This nonstandard feature is to maintain nonstandard access control at four locations along ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Pass Road/International Parkway to avoid excessive cost to acquire additional right-of-way from adjacent property owners as follows: (a) Location 1: EB Off-Ramp Junction with ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Pass Road Proposed 105 ft (b) Location 2: WB On-Ramp Junction with ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Pass Road/International Parkway Proposed 50 ft (c) Location 3: WB Off-Ramp Junction with ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Pass Road/International Parkway 65 ft (d) Location 4: EB On-Ramp Junction with ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Pass Road Proposed 100 ft The proposed project will the ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Ranch development. Two build alternatives were considered for the traffic operations analysis: Alternative 1 is an L-9 tight diamond with a loop on-ramp and Alternative 2 is a DDI. Based on the results of the Design Year 2042 AM and PM Peak Hour freeway mainline, on-ramp merge, offramp diverge, and intersection level of service operations analysi...

Related to Nonstandard Design Features

  • Specific Provisions for Access Rights to Software For the avoidance of doubt, the general provisions for Access Rights provided for in this Section 9 are applicable also to Software. Parties’ Access Rights to Software do not include any right to receive source code or object code ported to a certain hardware platform or any right to receive respective Software documentation in any particular form or detail, but only as available from the Party granting the Access Rights.

  • Alternative Work Schedule An alternate forty (40) hour work schedule (other than five (5) uniform and consecutive eight (8) hour days in a seven (7) day period), or for hospital personnel an eighty (80) hour workweek in a fourteen (14) day period and other mutually agreed upon schedules that comply with applicable federal and state law. Employee work schedules normally include two (2) consecutive days off.

  • Optional Features The Optional Features Prices selected for the Option Aircraft will be adjusted to Boeing's current prices as of the date of execution of the definitive agreement for the Option Aircraft.

  • Schematic Design Phase 1.2.1 Based on the mutually agreed upon Program of Requirements, Amount Available for the Construction Contract and the Project Schedule, the Architect/Engineer shall prepare sufficient alternative approaches utilizing BIM for design and construction of the Project to satisfy Owner’s project requirements and shall, at completion of this phase, submit Schematic Design Documents derived from the model in accordance with the BIM Execution Plan, “Facility Design Guidelines” and any additional requirements set forth in Article 15. The Architect/Engineer shall review alternative approaches to design and construction for the Project as they are being modeled at intervals appropriate to the progress of the Project with the Owner and Construction Manager at the Project site or other location specified by the Owner within the State of Texas. The Architect/Engineer shall utilize the model(s) to support the review process during Schematic Design. The Architect/Engineer shall provide the Construction Manager with a compact disc containing documents and data files derived from the model to assist the Construction Manager in fulfilling its responsibilities to the Owner. 1.2.2 Architect/Engineer shall provide all services necessary to perform the services of this phase (preparation of model(s), relevant data, decision support model views and Schematic Design Documents) including, without limitation, unless otherwise approved by Owner, the preparation and prompt delivery of all items specified in the BIM Execution Plan and “Facility Design Guidelines”. 1.2.3 Architect/Engineer shall work closely with Owner in preparation of schematic drawings and shall specifically conform to Owner’s requirements regarding aesthetic design issues. 1.2.4 The Architect/Engineer shall review the Estimated Construction Cost prepared by the Construction Manager, and shall provide written comments. 1.2.5 Before proceeding into the Design Development Phase, the Architect/Engineer shall obtain Owner’s written acceptance of the Schematic Design documents and approval of the Architect/Engineer’s preliminary Estimated Construction Cost and schedule. 1.2.6 The Architect/Engineer shall participate in a final review of the Schematic Design Documents and model(s) with the Owner and Construction Manager at the Project site or other location specified by Owner in the State of Texas. Prior to the Owner’s approval of the Schematic Design Documents, the Architect/Engineer shall incorporate such changes as are necessary to satisfy the Owner’s review comments, any of which may be appealed for good cause.

  • Schematic Design See Section 2, Part 1, Article 2.1.4, Paragraph 2.1.4.2.