NTT HIRING SEARCHES Clause Samples

The "NTT Hiring Searches" clause defines the procedures and limitations related to recruitment activities conducted by NTT. Typically, this clause outlines how NTT may search for and hire candidates, possibly specifying restrictions on soliciting employees from certain parties or requiring adherence to agreed-upon recruitment protocols. For example, it may prohibit NTT from targeting employees of the other contracting party or mandate notification before initiating searches. The core function of this clause is to prevent conflicts of interest and protect the workforce stability of the parties involved by regulating hiring practices during the term of the agreement.
NTT HIRING SEARCHES. Montana State University is committed, both in principle and by State and Federal regulations, to open and inclusive hiring practices. To facilitate NTT faculty appointments, hiring authorities are generally required to select NTT faculty appointees from a hiring pool. Applications are received and reviewed at the department level. Any exception to hiring from a pool requires approval from the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. To encourage participation, all hiring pools are publicly advertised for each pool cycle. Hiring pools are maintained for two-year cycles; all applications meeting minimum qualification received at any point in that cycle will be retained for the remainder of the current cycle. At the end of the cycle, all current applications will be purged. Current NTT faculty members must maintain an application in the appropriate pool(s) in order to be considered for appointment. While there is no automatic reappointment of NTT faculty on semester or AY appointments, program continuity and faculty experience at MSU are among the considerations that hiring authorities take into account when making hiring decisions. Current NTT faculty may make their intentions known during their annual review as to whether they wish to be considered for ongoing employment in the upcoming year, but will still be expected to maintain an application in the current hiring pool cycle and to resubmit to the pool after the two-year period has expired.
View SourceView Similar (7)
NTT HIRING SEARCHES. Montana State University is committed, both in principle and by State and Federal regulations, to open and inclusive hiring practices. To facilitate NTT faculty appointments, hiring authorities are generally required to select NTT faculty appointees from a hiring pool. Any exception to hiring from a pool requires approval from the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. The hiring pools are intended to allow qualified individuals to make their interest in one or more positions known. To encourage participation, all hiring pools are publically advertised at least once every two years. Applications are received and reviewed at the department level. Applications meeting minimum qualifications will be retained in the pool for the remainder of the two-year period. NTT faculty members must maintain a current application in the appropriate pool(s) in order to be considered for appointment. While there is no automatic reappointment of NTT faculty on semester or AY appointments, program continuity and faculty experience at MSU are among the considerations that hiring authorities may take into account when making hiring decisions. Current NTT faculty may make their intentions known during their annual review as to whether they wish to be considered for ongoing employment in the upcoming year, but will still be expected to update their applications to the hiring pools every two years.
View Source

Related to NTT HIRING SEARCHES

  • Target Population TREATMENT FOR ADULT (TRA) Target Population

  • Search Results; Lien Terminations Certified copies of Uniform Commercial Code search reports dated a date reasonably near to the Closing Date, listing all effective financing statements which name any Loan Party (under their present names and any previous names) as debtors, together with (a) copies of such financing statements, (b) payoff letters evidencing repayment in full of all Debt to be Repaid, the termination of all agreements relating thereto and the release of all Liens granted in connection therewith, with Uniform Commercial Code or other appropriate termination statements and documents effective to evidence the foregoing (other than Liens permitted by Section 11.2) and (c) such other Uniform Commercial Code termination statements as the Administrative Agent may reasonably request.

  • Targets and Milestones For the purposes of this Access Agreement, the University of Bristol will assess progress in widening participation against a combination of progress measures which, between them, are designed to assess: • The specific impact of a number of key outreach initiatives. • Year on year progress in diversifying our applicant and student population. • Year on year progress in improving conversion of under-represented applicants. Bearing in mind the range of outreach activities which we plan to offer, we intend to measure year on year progress in attracting a wider pool of applicants by focusing particularly on each of the following categories (although additional measures included in our 2012 Agreement have also been retained for continuity of monitoring): • Applicants from low performing schools • Applicants from socio-economic groups 4-7 • Local applicants Progress measures for each of these are provided at Appendix Four. In each case, we have included new measures, to assess improvements in application to intake conversion. As far as possible, measures have been calculated taking account of the expected impact of a number of specific outreach initiatives (the Access to Bristol scheme, summer school programme and personal adviser scheme), each of which also has more detailed performance targets associated with them (also detailed at Appendix Four). Measurement of the University’s intake profile will be focused on the low school performance category, reflecting the role which this plays in our contextual approach to admissions. Measures relating to mature student intake have been included for continuity. The recent decision to grow our undergraduate numbers substantially means that continuing to measure progress in diversifying intake by looking at under-represented groups as a percentage of total intake is no longer meaningful. For each intake-related measure, we have therefore added the number of students which the original percentages might have been expected to deliver. Monitoring against these numbers will give a more accurate picture of progress. All progress measures have been informed by more detailed analysis of progress against the institutional milestones detailed in Appendix Two and will be re-calculated annually to reflect assessment of our progress to date. In addition, it should be noted that we intend to carry out further research, for example, to better understand the impact of educational standards in the Bristol area on our ability to progress at the specified rates; we may need to adjust the progress measures contained in this agreement for future years to reflect the findings.

  • Loop Provisioning Involving Integrated Digital Loop Carriers 2.6.1 Where Freedom has requested an Unbundled Loop and BellSouth uses IDLC systems to provide the local service to the End User and BellSouth has a suitable alternate facility available, BellSouth will make such alternative facilities available to Freedom. If a suitable alternative facility is not available, then to the extent it is technically feasible, BellSouth will implement one of the following alternative arrangements for Freedom (e.g. hairpinning): 1. Roll the circuit(s) from the IDLC to any spare copper that exists to the customer premises. 2. Roll the circuit(s) from the IDLC to an existing DLC that is not integrated. 3. If capacity exists, provide "side-door" porting through the switch. 4. If capacity exists, provide "Digital Access Cross Connect System (DACS)- door" porting (if the IDLC routes through a DACS prior to integration into the switch). 2.6.2 Arrangements 3 and 4 above require the use of a designed circuit. Therefore, non- designed Loops such as the SL1 voice grade and UCL-ND may not be ordered in these cases. 2.6.3 If no alternate facility is available, and upon request from Freedom, and if agreed to by both Parties, BellSouth may utilize its Special Construction (SC) process to determine the additional costs required to provision facilities. Freedom will then have the option of paying the one-time SC rates to place the Loop.

  • Parent Right to Access and Challenge Student Data The LEA shall establish reasonable procedures pursuant to which a parent, as that term is defined in 105 ILCS 10/2(g), may inspect and/or copy Student Data and/or challenge the accuracy, relevance or propriety of Student Data, pursuant to Sections 5 and 7 of ISSRA (105 ILCS 10/5; 105 ILCS 10/7) and Section 33 of SOPPA (105 ILCS 85/33). The Provider shall respond to any request by the LEA for Student Data in the possession of the Provider when Provider cooperation is required to afford a parent an opportunity to inspect and/or copy the Student Data, no later than 5 business days from the date of the request. In the event that a parent contacts the Provider directly to inspect and/or copy Student Data, the Provider shall refer the parent to the LEA, which shall follow the necessary and proper procedures regarding the requested Student Data.