OUT-OF-UNIT MOVEMENT Sample Clauses

The OUT-OF-UNIT MOVEMENT clause defines the rules and procedures for moving individuals or property out of a designated unit or premises. Typically, this clause outlines the conditions under which such movement is permitted, any required notifications or approvals, and any restrictions or limitations that may apply. For example, it may specify that tenants must provide advance notice before removing large items or that certain security protocols must be followed. The core function of this clause is to maintain order and security within the premises by regulating and tracking movements out of the unit, thereby preventing unauthorized removals or disruptions.
OUT-OF-UNIT MOVEMENT. 1. In the event the University initiates the movement of a person in a Postdoctoral Scholar title to a University title that is not in the bargaining unit during the Postdoctoral Scholar appointment, the University shall notify the Union in writing. a. If the Union contests the removal of the individual(s) from the bargaining unit within fifteen (15) calendar days after receiving the University’s notice, the University shall submit the matter to PERB for resolution. The University will not remove Postdoctoral Scholars from the bargaining unit until UC and the UAW reach agreement, or the matter is resolved by PERB. b. If the Union does not contest the unit assignment of the Postdoctoral Scholar title(s) within the fifteen (15) calendar day notice period, the movement out of the unit may proceed. 2. In the event the University proposes to move the title of Postdoctoral Scholar– Employee, Postdoctoral Scholar-Fellow, or Postdoctoral Scholar-Paid-Direct out of the bargaining unit, the University shall notify the Union in writing. a. If the Union contests the removal of the title(s) from the bargaining unit within sixty (60) calendar days of receiving the University’s notice, the University shall submit the matter to PERB for resolution. The University will not remove Postdoctoral Scholar titles from the bargaining unit until UC and the UAW reach agreement, or the matter is resolved by PERB. b. If the Union does not contest the unit assignment of the Postdoctoral Scholar title(s) within the sixty (60) calendar day notice period, the movement out of the unit may proceed.
OUT-OF-UNIT MOVEMENT. INDIVIDUAL ACADEMIC RESEARCHERS 1. Should the University identify Academic Researchers who it contends are no longer appropriately classified as bargaining unit members, the campus or health system location shall: a. Provide the Union notice no later than thirty (30) calendar days in advance of the effective date of the out of unit movement; b. Identify the name(s) and in unit title(s) of the Academic Researcher(s); c. Identify the new duties or circumstances which constitute an out of bargaining unit designation; d. Identify the new title code(s) the Academic Researcher(s) will be moved into; e. Provide the union the opportunity to meet and discuss the decision within ten (10) calendar days from the date of the notice and whom to contact in the event the union requests to meet. 2. The Academic Researcher(s) shall be moved out of the unit on the effective date in the notice. 3. If the Union decides to pursue a challenge after the meeting in Section B.1.e above, the Union shall do so through the grievance procedure. The date of the meeting, shall be considered the date the Union knew or should have known, in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 - Grievance and Arbitration Procedures, Section D.2.a. 4. If the Union pursues the matter to arbitration, the arbitrator is limited to the following remedies: ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ the grievance and place the Academic Researcher(s) back into bargaining unit in the appropriate title code; or b. Deny the grievance in which case there shall be no further action and the Academic Researcher(s) remains in a title code out of the bargaining unit. 5. If the Arbitrator grants the grievance, the Academic Researcher(s) is solely responsible for any back dues owed to the Union.

Related to OUT-OF-UNIT MOVEMENT

  • Innovative Unit Scheduling Schedules other than those included in Articles 13.01 and 13.02 may be developed in order to improve quality of working life, support continuity of patient care, ensure adequate staffing resources, and support cost-efficiency. The parties agree that such innovative schedules may be determined locally by the Hospital and the Union subject to the following principles: (a) Such schedules shall be established by mutual agreement of the Hospital and the Union; (b) These schedules may pertain to full-time and/or part-time nurses; (c) The introduction of such schedules and trial periods, if any, shall be determined by the local parties and recorded in the Appendix of Local Provisions. Such schedules may be discontinued by either party with notice as determined within the Appendix of Local Provisions; (d) Upon written agreement of the Hospital and the Union, the parties may agree to amend collective agreement provisions to accommodate any innovative unit schedules.

  • Cost Responsibility for Interconnection Facilities and Distribution Upgrades 4.1 Interconnection Facilities 4.2 Distribution Upgrades

  • Interconnection Customer Provided Services The services provided by Interconnection Customer under this LGIA are set forth in Article 9.6 and Article 13.5. 1. Interconnection Customer shall be paid for such services in accordance with Article 11.6.

  • Two-Way Interconnection Trunks 2.4.1 Where the Parties use Two-Way Interconnection Trunks for the exchange of traffic between Verizon and KDL, KDL, at its own expense, shall: 2.4.1.1 provide its own facilities to the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Verizon’s network in a LATA; and/or 2.4.1.2 obtain transport to the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Verizon’s network in a LATA (a) from a third party, or, (b) if Verizon offers such transport pursuant to this Agreement or an applicable Verizon Tariff, from Verizon. 2.4.2 Where the Parties use Two-Way Interconnection Trunks for the exchange of traffic between Verizon and KDL, Verizon, at its own expense, shall provide its own facilities to the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Verizon’s network in a LATA. 2.4.3 Prior to establishing any Two-Way Interconnection Trunks, KDL shall meet with Verizon to conduct a joint planning meeting (“Joint Planning Meeting”). At that Joint Planning Meeting, each Party shall provide to the other Party originating Centium Call Seconds (Hundred Call Seconds) information, and the Parties shall mutually agree on the appropriate initial number of End Office and Tandem Two-Way Interconnection Trunks and the interface specifications at the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Verizon’s network in a LATA at which the Parties interconnect for the exchange of traffic. Where the Parties have agreed to convert existing One-Way Interconnection Trunks to Two-Way Interconnection Trunks, at the Joint Planning Meeting, the Parties shall also mutually agree on the conversion process and project intervals for conversion of such One- Way Interconnection Trunks to Two-Way Interconnection Trunks. 2.4.4 On a semi-annual basis, KDL shall submit a good faith forecast to Verizon of the number of End Office and Tandem Two-Way Interconnection Trunks that KDL anticipates Verizon will need to provide during the ensuing two (2) year period for the exchange of traffic between KDL and Verizon. KDL’s trunk forecasts shall conform to the Verizon CLEC trunk forecasting guidelines as in effect at that time. 2.4.5 The Parties shall meet (telephonically or in person) from time to time, as needed, to review data on End Office and Tandem Two-Way Interconnection Trunks to determine the need for new trunk groups and to plan any necessary changes in the number of Two-Way Interconnection Trunks. 2.4.6 Two-Way Interconnection Trunks shall have SS7 Common Channel Signaling. The Parties agree to utilize B8ZS and Extended Super Frame (ESF) DS1 facilities, where available. 2.4.7 With respect to End Office Two-Way Interconnection Trunks, both Parties shall use an economic Centium Call Seconds (Hundred Call Seconds) equal to five (5). Either Party may disconnect End Office Two-Way Interconnection Trunks that, based on reasonable engineering criteria and capacity constraints, are not warranted by the actual traffic volume experienced. 2.4.8 Two-Way Interconnection Trunk groups that connect to a Verizon access Tandem shall be engineered using a design blocking objective of ▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ B.005 during the average time consistent busy hour. Two-Way Interconnection Trunk groups that connect to a Verizon local Tandem shall be engineered using a design blocking objective of ▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ B.01 during the average time consistent busy hour. Verizon and KDL shall engineer Two-Way Interconnection Trunks using Telcordia Notes on the Networks SR 2275 (formerly known as BOC Notes on the LEC Networks SR-TSV-002275). 2.4.9 The performance standard for final Two-Way Interconnection Trunk groups shall be that no such Interconnection Trunk group will exceed its design blocking objective (B.005 or B.01, as applicable) for three

  • One-Way Interconnection Trunks 2.3.1 Where the Parties use One-Way Interconnection Trunks for the delivery of traffic from Onvoy to Frontier, Onvoy, at Onvoy’s own expense, shall: 2.3.1.1 provide its own facilities for delivery of the traffic to the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Frontier’s network in a LATA; and/or 2.3.1.2 obtain transport for delivery of the traffic to the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Frontier’s network in a LATA (a) from a third party, or, (b) if Frontier offers such transport pursuant to a Frontier access Tariff, from Frontier. 2.3.2 For each Tandem or End Office One-Way Interconnection Trunk group for delivery of traffic from Onvoy to Frontier with a utilization level of less than sixty percent (60%) for final trunk groups and eighty-five percent (85%) for high usage trunk groups, unless the Parties agree otherwise, Onvoy will promptly submit ASRs to disconnect a sufficient number of Interconnection Trunks to attain a utilization level of approximately sixty percent (60%) for all final trunk groups and eighty-five percent (85%) for all high usage trunk groups. In the event Onvoy fails to submit an ASR to disconnect One-Way Interconnection Trunks as required by this Section, Frontier may disconnect the excess Interconnection Trunks or bill (and Onvoy shall pay) for the excess Interconnection Trunks at the rates set forth in the Pricing Attachment. 2.3.3 Where the Parties use One-Way Interconnection Trunks for the delivery of traffic from Frontier to Onvoy, Frontier, at Frontier’s own expense, shall provide its own facilities for delivery of the traffic to the technically feasible Point(s) of Interconnection on Frontier’s network in a LATA.