Common use of PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM Clause in Contracts

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM. (a) Company has established a performance evaluation program to (1) assist Seller in improving performance and (2) aid in the source selection process relative to future work. The program applies to this Agreement. (b) Ratings are used by Company to recognize outstanding performance, as well as to identify areas of deficient performance in order that corrective actions can be taken to ▇▇▇▇▇▇ continuous improvement. Key areas to be evaluated and their order of importance are: (1) Safety and Health; (2) Field Operations and Execution; (3) Quality; (4) Project Commissioning, Closeout, and Post-Project Support; (5) Environmental; (6) Project Control; (7) Contract Administration; (8) Health Physics; (9) Security; and (10) Diversity. The Evaluation Report will be prepared jointly by the Subcontract Administrator and the Technical Project Officer and will include input from other project team members. (c) At completion of this Agreement, every 12 months during the term of the Agreement or underling task order, or at shorter intervals at Company’s sole discretion, Company’s Subcontract Administrator will provide a Performance Evaluation Report to the Seller’s senior management regarding the Seller’s performance. Seller shall be notified of performance determined to be Marginal or Unsatisfactory in any key process area. Seller is expected to take immediate action to correct any identified deficiency. If Seller disagrees with the rating, Seller shall have 30 calendar days from the date of the notice to respond with factual information relating to its performance. Any disputed rating shall be reviewed and a final determination made by the Company’s Director of Contracts, exclusively. All disputes concerning the evaluation of Seller’s performance are not subject to review by any agency, board, or judicial entity.

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM. (a) Company has established a performance evaluation program to (1) assist Seller in improving performance and (2) aid in the source selection process relative to future work. The program applies to this Agreement. (b) Ratings are used by Company to recognize outstanding performance, as well as to identify areas of deficient performance in order that corrective actions can be taken to ▇▇▇▇▇▇ continuous improvement. Key areas to be evaluated and their order of importance are: (1) Safety and Health; (2) Field Operations and Execution; (3) Quality; (4) Project Commissioning, Closeout, and Post-Project Support; (5) Environmental; (6) Project Control; (7) Contract Administration; (8) Health Physics; (9) Security; and (10) Diversity. The Evaluation Report will be prepared jointly by the Subcontract Administrator Procurement Officer and the Technical Project Officer and will include input from other project team members. (c) At completion of this Agreement, every 12 months during the term of the Agreement or underling task order, or at shorter intervals at Company’s sole discretion, Company’s Subcontract Administrator Procurement Officer will provide a Performance Evaluation Report to the Seller’s senior management regarding the Seller’s performance. Seller shall be notified of performance determined to be Marginal or Unsatisfactory in any key process area. Seller is expected to take immediate action to correct any identified deficiency. If Seller disagrees with the rating, Seller shall have 30 calendar days from the date of the notice to respond with factual information relating to its performance. Any disputed rating shall be reviewed and a final determination made by the Company’s Director of Contracts, exclusively. All disputes concerning the evaluation of Seller’s performance are not subject to review by any agency, board, or judicial entity.