Post Tenure Review File Sample Clauses

Post Tenure Review File. A faculty member subject to review must create a confidential post-tenure review file, which is the sole basis for review, containing the following information: a. the department’s or unit’s approved merit criteria for teaching, scholarship, & service, and/or other forms of evidence of merit, such as letters from faculty and students, and/or peer- observations of teaching; b. a current curriculum vitae;
View SourceView Similar (8)
Post Tenure Review File. A faculty member subject to review must create a confidential post-tenure review file, which is the sole basis for review, containing the following information: the department’s or unit’s approved tenure, promotion, and merit criteria; a current curriculum vitae; a list of additional activities not covered by the curriculum vitae; summary evidence of instructional excellence (last three years of instructional evaluation data); summary evidence of scholarly/creative activities, and service activities (for the review period); and a brief narrative statement (no longer than 3 pages or 1,500 words). The narrative statement should briefly outline the faculty member’s goals for professional development, describing past accomplishments and future objectives specific to those goals, and it may also identify barriers to or necessary resources for the accomplishment of these objectives. The candidate should also review progress toward goals cited during a prior review process and challenges that impacted their performance toward those goals. The faculty member’s department chair will provide the annual merit evaluations for the relevant six-year period preceding the review. NOTE: While the file is currently conceptualized as a paper-based document, the University reserves the right to move toward a digital portfolio management system at some point.
View Source

Related to Post Tenure Review File

  • Personnel File An employee, or the President of the Union, or his/her designate, with the written authority of the employee, shall be entitled to review the employee's personnel file(s), both paper and, if applicable, electronic, in the office in which the file is normally kept, in order to facilitate the investigation of a grievance. The employee or the President, as the case may be, shall give the Employer adequate notice prior to having access to such file(s).

  • Review of Custodial Files The Custodian agrees, for the benefit of Certificateholders, to review, in accordance with the provisions of Section 2.01 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, each Custodial File. If in performing the review required by this Section 2.3 the Custodian finds any document or documents constituting a part of a Custodial File to be missing or defective in any material respect, the Custodian shall promptly so notify the Seller, the Master Servicer and the Trustee.

  • EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND EMPLOYEE FILES 19.01 (a) When a formal assessment of an employee’s performance is made, the employee concerned must be given an opportunity to discuss and then sign the assessment form in question upon its completion to indicate that its contents have been read. A copy of the assessment form will be provided to the employee at that time. An employee’s signature on his or her assessment form will be considered to be an indication only that its contents have been read and shall not indicate the employee’s concurrence with the statements contained on the form.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings