Post Tenure Review Process Sample Clauses

Post Tenure Review Process. The PTR process will be conducted in two (2) steps. Faculty will be notified by the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/VPAA by May 15 that they have been scheduled for review. The VPAA/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ will make the final selections in consultation with the ▇▇▇▇ of the Faculty and based on selection guidelines in this document. A letter will be sent to each selected faculty member with copies to the ▇▇▇▇, Department Chair and the PTR committee. The names of affected faculty members will be included in the October biannual report to the Contract Administrator of ▇▇▇- ▇▇▇▇. 1. The materials described below* will be submitted by the Faculty Member to the Department Chair by October 31. Upon review of the portfolio, the Department Chair will forward the portfolio along with an evaluative report to the ▇▇▇▇ of the Faculty by November 7. If the ▇▇▇▇ of the Faculty decides, following review of the portfolio and Department Chair's report, with a preponderance of the evidence that further review is needed, the previously submitted materials accompanied by the ▇▇▇▇'▇ assessment, will be referred to the PTR Committee no later than January 15. 2. The PTR Committee will then review/evaluate all aforementioned materials and submit its findings to the VPAA/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ by March 15. The VPAA/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ will send a letter to each faculty member, the Department Chair, the ▇▇▇▇ of the Faculty, and the Chair of the PTR Committee advising them of the outcome of their review. This letter will be sent no later than April 30. (a) The assessment rubric to be used by the ▇▇▇▇ of the Faculty and PTR Committee was developed jointly by the Deans, the Faculty Committee on Assessment and the Faculty PTR Committee, in 2017. An alternate rubric may be created at the same time for library faculty. The Faculty Committee on Assessment will review the rubric at least once every three years, and more frequently, if necessary, based on recommendations in the PTR Committee's annual report. Any changes to the rubric will be brought before the faculty for approval in accordance with the Faculty By-Laws prior to its implementation. (b) The PTR Committee will review the submitted materials and may request additional documentation including a response by the faculty member to the ▇▇▇▇'▇ assessment. The Faculty Member will always be afforded an opportunity to respond to the ▇▇▇▇'▇ assessment. The PTR Committee will issue a recommendation to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/Vice President of Academic Affairs, ▇▇▇▇ of the Faculty and ▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ administrator with a cop...
View SourceView Similar (4)
Post Tenure Review Process. 1. The first post-tenure review will take place in the third year after the granting of tenure, and every fifth year thereafter. Adjustments to this schedule may be arranged by mutual agreement between the faculty member and the appropriate ▇▇▇▇. 2. The faculty member will form a committee during the first thirty (30) days of the review year. This committee will consist of at least three (3) members, including the appropriate ▇▇▇▇ or designee and at least one tenured faculty member within the division. The third member can be an additional faculty member, a staff member who works closely with the faculty member, a tenured faculty member outside the district with a similar disciplinary focus, or a professional working in a related field. The committee will convene for at least one quarter of the review year. 3. The faculty member will develop a plan for the proposed review schedule within thirty (30) days of the start of the review year and share the plan with the committee. This plan will include a variety of means of assessment including a concise narrative on the following: a. The faculty member’s impact on student learning and success. b. The faculty member’s contribution to their discipline. c. The District’s mission, goals and strategic plans. d. The faculty member will also solicit input from students. The nature of this input shall be determined by the faculty member. 4. The faculty member and committee will prepare and sign a brief written report summarizing the review process and submit this to the appropriate ▇▇▇▇ no later than one year from the start of the review process. The faculty member will be given a written confirmation upon receipt of this document. 5. The District President will notify the Board of Trustees of the completion of the review at a regularly scheduled Board meeting not more than two (2) months after the review has been completed.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Post Tenure Review Process. At least every three years a tenured unit member’s ▇▇▇▇, director or designee shall provide written evaluations to tenured unit members. A tenured unit member’s department head/chair shall also provide an evaluation at the request of the ▇▇▇▇, director or designee. Tenured unit members shall be evaluated comprehensively every six years by peer unit members and administrators. These evaluations shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures set forth in Article 9.2.5, except that unit member will submit only a complete CV and cumulative Annual Activity Reports. The review will consider the CV, Annual Activity Reports, interim evaluations and other appropriate information, and will proceed to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. The review may proceed to the chancellor only at the request of the unit member. At any time prior to a scheduled evaluation, the unit member's ▇▇▇▇ or director may, as a result of other evaluations, initiate the post-tenure review process. In addition, a post tenure review shall be conducted upon the request of a unit member. For purposes of transition, the initial comprehensive review during the term of this Agreement shall be as currently scheduled unless that would result in a lapse of more than three years between reviews. In that case the unit member will be evaluated through the process set out in paragraph 1 of this section. A scheduled review will in any event occur at least three years from the date of the unit member’s most recent promotion, tenure or scheduled comprehensive post tenure review. Where a ▇▇▇▇ or director initiates an early comprehensive review, a unit member shall be notified no later than the end of the appointment period.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Post Tenure Review Process. The post-tenure review process is faculty-driven, wholly formative, and in no way summative. It provides faculty members an opportunity to reflect on their work, and to closely examine some aspect of their work at the college. These post-tenure reviews can take a variety of shapes and forms depending on the faculty member’s program or department, as well as their teaching strengths. Faculty members may present their work to the Board of Trustees and the campus community at large. 1. The first post-tenure review will take place in the third year after the granting of tenure, and every fifth year after the first post-tenure review. Adjustments to this schedule may be arranged by mutual agreement between the faculty member and the appropriate ▇▇▇▇/director. Example timeline: tenured status starts in the fall of the 2023/2024 academic year; the first post tenure review starts in the fall of the 2026/2027 academic year; five-year review begins in the fall of the 2031/2032 academic year. 2. The faculty member will form a committee during the first 30 days of the review year. This committee will consist of at least three members, including the appropriate ▇▇▇▇ or designee and at least one tenured faculty member within the division. The third member can be an additional faculty member, a staff member who works closely with the faculty member, a tenured faculty member outside the district with a similar disciplinary focus or a professional working in a related field. The committee will convene for at least one quarter of the review year. 3. The faculty member will develop a post-tenure review plan for the proposed review within 30 days of the start of the review year and share the plan with the committee. This plan will include a variety of means of assessment including a concise narrative on the following: a. The faculty member’s impact on student learning and success. b. The faculty member’s contribution to their discipline. c. The District’s mission, goals and strategic plans. d. The faculty member will also solicit input from students. The nature of this input shall be determined by the faculty member. 4. The committee will review the plan to ensure that it complies with the above parameters. The committee will make recommendations for improvement to the faculty member if necessary. 5. The faculty member will complete their plan for post-tenure review and submit their results or findings to their committee. 6. The committee will review the results and will make...
View SourceView Similar (2)
Post Tenure Review Process. The PTR process will be conducted in two (2) steps. a. Faculty will be notified by the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/VPAA by September 15 that they have been scheduled for review. The VPAA/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ will make the final selections in consultation with the Deans and based on selection guidelines in this document. A letter will be sent to each selected faculty member with copies to his/her ▇▇▇▇, Department Chair and the PTR committee. The names of affected faculty members will be included in the October biannual report to the Contract Administrator of LUC-AAUP. The materials described below* will be submitted by the Faculty Member to the Department Chair by October 31. Upon review of the portfolio, the Department Chair will forward the portfolio along with an evaluative report to the ▇▇▇▇ by November 7. If the ▇▇▇▇ decides, following review of the portfolio and Department Chair’s report, with a preponderance of the evidence that further review is needed, the previously submitted materials accompanied by the ▇▇▇▇’▇ assessment, will be referred to the PTR Committee no later than January 15. b. The PTR Committee will then review/evaluate all aforementioned materials and submit its findings to the VPAA/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ by March 15. The VPAA/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ will send a letter to each faculty member, the Department Chair, the ▇▇▇▇, and the Chair of the PTR Committee advising them of the outcome of his/her review. This letter will be sent no later than April
View Source

Related to Post Tenure Review Process

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Asset Representations Review Process Section 3.01 Asset Representations Review Notices and Identification of Review Receivables. On receipt of an Asset Representations Review Notice from the Seller according to Section 5.7 of the Receivables Purchase Agreement, the Asset Representations Reviewer will start an Asset Representations Review. The Servicer will provide the list of Review Receivables to the Asset Representations Reviewer promptly upon receipt of the Asset Representations Review Notice. The Asset Representations Reviewer will not be obligated to start, and will not start, an Asset Representations Review until an Asset Representations Review Notice and the related list of Review Receivables is received. The Asset Representations Reviewer is not obligated to verify (i) whether the conditions to the initiation of the Asset Representations Review and the issuance of an Asset Representations Review Notice described in Section 7.6 of the Indenture were satisfied or (ii) the accuracy or completeness of the list of Review Receivables provided by the Servicer.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.