Prequalification Criteria Sample Clauses

The Prequalification Criteria clause establishes the minimum requirements that potential bidders or participants must meet to be considered eligible for a contract or project. These criteria may include factors such as financial stability, relevant experience, technical capability, and compliance with legal or regulatory standards. By setting clear benchmarks for participation, this clause ensures that only qualified and capable parties are considered, thereby reducing the risk of project failure and streamlining the selection process.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Prequalification Criteria. The Construction Manager shall make recommendations for prequalification criteria for bidders, develop bidders' interest in the Project, establish bidding schedules, assist the Architect in issuing bidding documents to bidders, conduct pre-bidding conferences to familiarize bidders with the bidding documents and management techniques and with any special systems, materials or methods, assist the Architect with receipt and answering of questions from bidders, and with issuance of addenda. With the Architect's assistance, the Construction Manager shall receive bids, prepare bid analyses and make recommendations to Old National for awarding of contracts or rejection of bids. Also, with the Architect's assistance, the Construction Manager shall conduct pre-award conferences with successful bidders and advise Old National on the acceptability of subcontractors and material suppliers proposed by contractors.
View Source
Prequalification Criteria. 4.3.1 The DB shall establish criteria for prequalification of prospective Bidders on Subcontracts that shall: 4.3.1.1 include the experience of a prospective Bidder, the prospective Bidder’s financial condition, conduct and performance on previous contracts, facilities, management skills, and ability to execute the associated Subcontract properly; 4.3.1.2 further any goals set as part of the EDGE program or other diversity and inclusion program required by Applicable Law; 4.3.1.3 require a prospective Bidder to submit a valid certificate of compliance issued by the EOC under ORC Section 9.47 to establish that it has not been found in violation of any affirmative action program during the last 5 years preceding the date of the prequalification application; and 4.3.1.4 require a prospective Bidder to submit proof of current licenses to perform the associated Work as required by the Contracting Authority or by Applicable Law. 4.3.2 The DB shall include any additional criteria for specific Subcontracts required by the Owner or Contracting Authority that are consistent with the scope and needs of the Project. 4.3.3 The DB shall submit its proposed prequalification criteria for each Subcontract to the Contracting Authority and place establishment of prequalification criteria on the Project Schedule. 4.3.4 The Contracting Authority shall approve or reject, in whole or in part, the prequalification criteria submitted by the DB. The Contracting Authority will use the approved prequalification criteria for any future analysis it may conduct concerning a prospective Bidder’s responsibility to perform a Subcontract.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Prequalification Criteria. A bidder participating in the procurement process shall possess the following minimum pre- qualification criteria.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Prequalification Criteria. 7.1 The tenderer must fulfill all the following conditions to be eligible for bidding for the contract. While bidding, the tenderer must attach relevant supporting documents. 7.2 The tenderer should be Agency having successfully completed similar work i.e. printing of office stationery during the last two (2) years in PSUs or reputed private organization/Company. In support to the same, ternderer must attach copies of proof of certificate along with technical bid. 7.3 The Average Contract value of the services so rendered during the last 2 years with a minimum contract value of Rs. 4 lakhs per annum. Copies of Work Orders may be submitted in support of the same. 7.4 The tenderer has to attach along with a Demand Draft for Rs. 590/- ( inlcluding GST towards tender fees drawn in favour of Pawan Hans Limited issued by a Commercial/ Nationalised/ scheduled Bank payable at Mumbai. . 7.5 The tenderer has to attach Demand Draft of Rs. 13,500/- i.e., 3% of Tender Value, drawn in favour of Pawan Hans Limited payable at Mumbai, from any Commercial/ Nationalized/Scheduled Bank as ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Money Deposit (EMD).
View Source
Prequalification Criteria. Vendor shall have similar experience of “Annual Maintenance Contract of EPABXSystem”.
View Source
Prequalification Criteria. The participating firm must fulfill the following minimum pre-qualification criteria and shall necessarily submit the relevant documents to support their claim.
View Source

Related to Prequalification Criteria

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Criteria (1) Annual Evaluation Criteria. All performance evaluations shall be based upon assigned duties, and shall carefully consider the nature of the assignment in terms, where applicable, of: a. Teaching effectiveness, including effectiveness in presenting knowledge, information, and ideas by means or methods such as lecture, discussion, assignment and recitation, demonstration, laboratory exercise, practical experience, supervision of interns, theses, professional projects and/or dissertations, and direct consultation with students. The evaluation shall include consideration of effectiveness in imparting knowledge and skills, and effectiveness in stimulating students' critical thinking and/or creative abilities, the development or revision of curriculum and course structure, and adherence to accepted standards of professional behavior in meeting responsibilities to students. The evaluator may take into account class notes, syllabi, student exams and assignments, and any other materials relevant to the employee's teaching assignment. The teaching evaluation must take into account any relevant materials submitted by the employee, including the results of peer evaluations of teaching, and may not be based solely on student evaluations when this additional information has been made available to the evaluator. b. Contribution to the discovery of new knowledge, development of new educational techniques, and other forms of creative activity. Evidence of research and other creative activity shall include, but not be limited to, published books; articles and papers in professional journals; musical compositions, paintings, sculpture; works of performing art; papers presented at meetings of professional societies; funded grant activities; and research and creative accomplishments that have not yet resulted in publication, display, or performance. The evaluation shall include consideration of the employee's productivity, including the quality and quantity of the employee's research and other creative programs and contributions during the year, as well as recognition by the academic or professional community of what has been done. c. Public service that extends professional or discipline-related contributions to the community, the State, public schools, and/or the national and international community. This public service includes contributions to scholarly and professional organizations, governmental boards, agencies, and commissions that are beneficial to such groups and individuals. d. Participation in the governance processes of the University through significant service on committees, councils, and senates, beyond that associated with the expected responsibility to participate in the governance of the University through participation in regular departmental or college meetings. e. Other assigned University duties, such as attending University events, advising, counseling, and academic administration, or as described in a Position Description, if any, of the position held by the employee. Other assigned duties may include entrepreneurial activities that contribute to the further development of the University with an end result of creating a new venture. Evidence of entrepreneurial contributions shall include, but not be limited to, creation of self- supporting centers or institutes, development of multi- disciplinary research partnerships, and applications of research to implementations in society. To provide guidelines for the establishment, maintenance and use of employee evaluation files within the employee’s respective academic unit.

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.

  • Desirable Selection Criteria Post registration qualification in the area of specialty or evidence of significant progression towards one.