Common use of Professional Development Decisions Clause in Contracts

Professional Development Decisions. 32.6.1 Applications for Professional Development are reviewed by a “Professional Development Committee”, consisting of the following: 32.6.1.1 Vice-President, Academic, or designate (Chair, non-voting); and 32.6.1.2 1 academic staff Supervisor, and 2 academic staff members who are not under consideration that year for Professional Development; 32.6.2 In making decisions to grant, defer, or deny Professional Development, the Supervisor and Vice-President, Academic base their decisions on: 32.6.2.1 the content and quality of each proposal; 32.6.2.2 the merits of each proposal and its relevance to the academic staff member’s duties at the University; 32.6.2.3 the relevance of each proposal to the University’s educational objectives; 32.6.2.4 recommendations regarding Professional Development arising from academic staff member’s Performance Reviews; 32.6.2.5 previous Professional Development opportunities; 32.6.2.6 academic staff members’ years of service; and 32.6.2.7 the cost of the proposal within the context of available funds 32.6.3 The Vice-President, Academic will make every effort to notify the academic staff member, in writing, of the decision in a timely manner.

Professional Development Decisions. 32.6.1 Applications for Professional Development are reviewed by a “Professional Development Committee”, consisting of the following: 32.6.1.1 Vice-President, Academic, or designate (Chair, non-voting); and 32.6.1.2 1 academic staff Supervisor, and 2 academic staff members who are not under consideration that year for Professional Development; 32.6.2 In making decisions to grant, defer, or deny Professional Development, the Supervisor and Vice-President, Academic base their decisions on: 32.6.2.1 the content and quality of each proposal; 32.6.2.2 the merits of each proposal and its relevance to the academic staff member’s duties at the Universityuniversity; 32.6.2.3 the relevance of each proposal to the Universityuniversity’s educational objectives; 32.6.2.4 recommendations regarding Professional Development arising from academic staff member’s Performance Reviews; 32.6.2.5 previous Professional Development opportunities; 32.6.2.6 academic staff members’ years of service; and 32.6.2.7 the cost of the proposal within the context of available funds 32.6.3 The Vice-President, Academic will make every effort to notify the academic staff member, in writing, of the decision in a timely manner.