Professional Development Evaluation. 19.5.1 A Professional Development Evaluation may be initiated by the ▇▇▇▇, with the consent of the CAS Member, or by the Member. The purpose of such an evaluation is to provide a written evaluation of the Member’s teaching performance in order to assess the Member who is eligible for seniority status under 13.6, or to assist the Member in the performance of his/her teaching duties under Article 16. Only those evaluations undertaken for an assessment for seniority status under 13.6 shall be placed in the Member’s Official File. 19.5.2 The CAS Member initiates a Professional Development Evaluation by writing to the ▇▇▇▇ stating the reason for the request and suggesting a time for the evaluation to take place. 19.5.3 The ▇▇▇▇ may choose a designate to perform the Professional Development Evaluation. The designate shall normally be from the academic unit or sub-unit, as appropriate, in which the course is offered, or from a cognate discipline, and shall not be a member of the PTAC that recommended the Professional Development Evaluation under Articles 13.6.2.6 and 13.6.2.7. 19.5.4 When the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate initiates such an evaluation by writing to the Member stating the purpose of the evaluation and suggesting the time for an evaluation to take place, the evaluation and its scheduling shall be subject to the mutual agreement of the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate. 19.5.5 The evaluation by the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate shall include: (a) a review of the Member’s Official File and all materials submitted by the Member; (b) a meeting prior to the initial classroom visit to discuss the evaluation process and the Member’s teaching methodology; and (c) attendance at the Member’s class to observe the CAS Member’s teaching. Subject to the mutual agreement of the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate, the evaluation may include more than one visit to the Member’s class, and/or more than one designate performing the evaluation. Where the professional development evaluation has been requested by the Member to assist in the performance of his/her teaching duties under Article 16, more than one meeting between the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate may be scheduled. Scheduling of additional visits and meetings shall be subject to the mutual agreement of the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/ her designate. For an Online Learning course, in lieu of a classroom visit, course materials, web sites and/or other components of the course shall be reviewed. A Professional Development Evaluation is in addition to the Teaching Evaluations under Article 19.2, 19.3 and 19.4. 19.5.6 Upon completion of 19.5.4, the ▇▇▇▇ or designate conducting the evaluation shall discuss the Member’s performance with the Member, and following this meeting shall send a written report of the evaluation to the Member, and, in the case of evaluations undertaken for an assessment for seniority status under 13.6, copied to PTAC. In addition to assessing the Member’s performance, this report may make recommendations to assist the Member in the performance of his/her duties. 19.5.7 This report of a Professional Development Evaluation shall be consistent with the terms and conditions and academic criteria set out in this Agreement.
Appears in 4 contracts
Sources: Collective Agreement, Collective Agreement, Collective Agreement
Professional Development Evaluation. 19.5.1 A Professional Development Evaluation may be initiated by the The ▇▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate, with the consent of the CAS Member, or by upon the request of the Member, may provide a written evaluation of the Member’s teaching performance. The purpose of such an evaluation is to provide a written evaluation of the Member’s teaching performance in order to assess the Member who is eligible applies for seniority status under 13.6, or to assist the Member in the performance of his/her teaching duties under Article 16. Only those evaluations undertaken for an assessment for seniority status under 13.6 shall be placed in the Member’s Official File.
19.5.2 The CAS Member initiates a Professional Development Evaluation by writing to the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate stating the reason for the request and suggesting a time for the evaluation to take place.
19.5.3 The ▇▇▇▇ may choose a designate to perform the Professional Development Evaluation. The designate shall normally be from the academic unit or sub-unit, as appropriate, in which the course is offered, or from a cognate discipline, and shall not be a member of the PTAC that recommended the Professional Development Evaluation under Articles 13.6.2.6 and 13.6.2.7.
19.5.4 When the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate initiates such an evaluation by writing to the Member stating the purpose of the evaluation and suggesting the time for an evaluation to take place. In the latter instance, the evaluation and its scheduling shall be subject to the mutual agreement of the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate.
19.5.5 19.5.3 The evaluation by the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate shall include:
(a) a review of the Member’s Official File and all materials submitted by the Member;
(b) a meeting prior to the initial classroom visit to discuss the evaluation process and the Member’s teaching methodology; and
(c) include attendance at the Member’s class to observe the CAS Member’s teaching. Subject to the mutual agreement of the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate, the evaluation may include more than one visit to the Member’s class, and/or more than one designate performing the evaluation. Where the professional development evaluation has been requested by the Member to assist in the performance of his/her teaching duties under Article 16, more than one meeting between the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate may be scheduled. Scheduling of additional visits and meetings shall be subject to the mutual agreement of the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/ her designate. For an Online Learning a Distance Education course, in lieu of a classroom visit, course materials, web sites and/or other components of the course shall be reviewed. A Professional Development Evaluation Such an evaluation is in addition to the Teaching Evaluations under Article 19.2, 19.3 and 19.4.
19.5.6 Upon completion of 19.5.4, the 19.5.4 The ▇▇▇▇ or designate conducting the evaluation shall discuss the Member’s performance with the Member, and following this meeting shall send a written report of the evaluation to the Member, and, in the case of evaluations undertaken for an assessment for seniority status under 13.6, copied to PTAC. In addition to assessing the Member’s performance, this report may make recommendations to assist the Member in the performance of his/her duties.
19.5.7 19.5.5 This report of a Professional Development Evaluation shall be consistent with the terms and conditions and academic criteria set out in this Agreement.
Appears in 3 contracts
Sources: Collective Agreement, Collective Agreement, Collective Agreement
Professional Development Evaluation. 19.5.1 A Professional Development Evaluation may be initiated by the The ▇▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate, with the consent of the CAS Member, or by upon the request of the Member, may provide a written evaluation of the Member’s teaching performance. The purpose of such an evaluation is to provide a written evaluation of the Member’s teaching performance in order to assess the Member who is eligible applies for seniority status under 13.6, or to assist the Member in the performance of his/her teaching duties under Article 16. Only those evaluations undertaken for an assessment for seniority status under 13.6 shall be placed in the Member’s Official File.
19.5.2 The CAS Member initiates a Professional Development Evaluation by writing to the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate stating the reason for the request and suggesting a time for the evaluation to take place.
19.5.3 The ▇▇▇▇ may choose a designate to perform the Professional Development Evaluation. The designate shall normally be from the academic unit or sub-unit, as appropriate, in which the course is offered, or from a cognate discipline, and shall not be a member of the PTAC that recommended the Professional Development Evaluation under Articles 13.6.2.6 and 13.6.2.7.
19.5.4 When the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate initiates such an evaluation by writing to the Member stating the purpose of the evaluation and suggesting the time for an evaluation to take place. In the latter instance, the evaluation and its scheduling shall be subject to the mutual agreement of the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate.
19.5.5 19.5.3 The evaluation by the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate shall include:
(a) a review of the Member’s Official File and all materials submitted by the Member;
(b) a meeting prior to the initial classroom visit to discuss the evaluation process and the Member’s teaching methodology; and
(c) include attendance at the Member’s class to observe the CAS Member’s teaching. Subject to the mutual agreement of the Member Member, and at the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designaterequest of either Party, the evaluation may include more than one visit to the Member’s class, and/or more than one designate performing the evaluation. Where the professional development evaluation has been requested by the Member to assist in the performance of his/her teaching duties under Article 16, more than one meeting between the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate may be scheduled. Scheduling of additional visits and meetings shall be subject to the mutual agreement of the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/ her designate. For an Online Learning course, in lieu of a classroom visit, course materials, web sites and/or other components of the course shall be reviewed. A Professional Development Evaluation Such an evaluation is in addition to the Teaching Evaluations under Article 19.2, 19.3 and 19.4.
19.5.6 Upon completion of 19.5.4, the 19.5.4 The ▇▇▇▇ or designate conducting the evaluation shall discuss the Member’s performance with the Member, and following this meeting shall send a written report of the evaluation to the Member, and, in the case of evaluations undertaken for an assessment for seniority status under 13.6, copied to PTAC. In addition to assessing the Member’s performance, this report may make recommendations to assist the Member in the performance of his/her duties.
19.5.7 19.5.5 This report of a Professional Development Evaluation shall be consistent with the terms and conditions and academic criteria set out in this Agreement.
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Collective Agreement, Collective Agreement
Professional Development Evaluation. 19.5.1 A Professional Development Evaluation may be initiated by the ▇▇▇▇, with the consent of the CAS CTF Member, or by the Member. The purpose of such an evaluation is to provide a written evaluation of the Member’s teaching performance in order to assess the Member who is eligible for seniority status under 13.613.7, or to assist the Member in the performance of his/her their teaching duties under Article 16. Only those evaluations undertaken for an assessment for seniority status under 13.6 13.7 shall be placed in the Member’s Official File.
19.5.2 The CAS CTF Member initiates a Professional Development Evaluation by writing to the ▇▇▇▇ stating the reason for the request and suggesting a time for the evaluation to take place.
19.5.3 The ▇▇▇▇ may choose a designate to perform the Professional Development Evaluation. The designate shall normally be from the academic unit or sub-unit, as appropriate, in which the course is offered, or from a cognate discipline, and shall not be a member of the PTAC that recommended the Professional Development Evaluation under Articles 13.6.2.6 13.7.2.6 and 13.6.2.713.7.2.7.
19.5.4 When the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her their designate initiates such an evaluation by writing to the Member stating the purpose of the evaluation and suggesting the time for an evaluation to take place, the evaluation and its scheduling shall be subject to the mutual agreement of the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her their designate.
19.5.5 The evaluation by the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her their designate shall include:
(a) a review of the Member’s Official File and all materials submitted by the Member;
(b) a meeting prior to the initial classroom visit to discuss the evaluation process and the Member’s teaching methodology; and
(c) attendance at the Member’s class to observe the CAS CTF Member’s teaching. Subject to the mutual agreement of the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her their designate, the evaluation may include more than one visit to the Member’s class, and/or more than one designate performing the evaluation. Where the professional development evaluation Professional Development Evaluation has been requested by the Member to assist in the performance of his/her their teaching duties under Article 16, more than one meeting between the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her their designate may be scheduled. Scheduling of additional visits and meetings shall be subject to the mutual agreement of the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/ her their designate. For an Online Learning course, in lieu of a classroom visit, course materials, web sites websites and/or other components of the course shall be reviewed. A Professional Development Evaluation is in addition to the Teaching Evaluations under Article 19.2, 19.3 and 19.4.
19.5.6 Upon completion of 19.5.4, the ▇▇▇▇ or designate conducting the evaluation shall discuss the Member’s performance with the Member, and following this meeting shall send a written report of the evaluation to the Member, and, in the case of evaluations undertaken for an assessment for seniority status under 13.613.7, copied to the PTAC. In addition to assessing the Member’s performance, this report may make recommendations to assist the Member in the performance of his/her their duties.
19.5.7 This report of a Professional Development Evaluation shall be consistent with the terms and conditions and academic criteria set out in this Agreement.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Collective Agreement
Professional Development Evaluation. 19.5.1 A Professional Development Evaluation may be initiated by the ▇▇▇▇, with the consent of the CAS Member, or by the Member. The purpose of such an evaluation is to provide a written evaluation of the Member’s teaching performance in order to assess the Member who is eligible for seniority status under 13.6, or to assist the Member in the performance of his/her teaching duties under Article 16. Only those evaluations undertaken for an assessment for seniority status under 13.6 shall be placed in the Member’s Official File.File.
19.5.2 The CAS Member initiates a Professional Development Evaluation by writing to the ▇▇▇▇ stating the reason for the request and suggesting a time for the evaluation to take place.
19.5.3 The ▇▇▇▇ may choose a designate to perform the Professional Development Evaluation. The designate shall normally be from the academic unit or sub-unit, as appropriate, in which the course is offered, or from a cognate discipline, and shall not be a member of the PTAC that recommended the Professional Development Evaluation under Articles 13.6.2.6 and 13.6.2.7.
19.5.4 When the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate initiates such an evaluation by writing to the Member stating the purpose of the evaluation and suggesting the time for an evaluation to take place, the evaluation and its scheduling shall be subject to the mutual agreement of the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate.
19.5.5 The evaluation by the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate shall include:
(a) a review of the Member’s Official File and all materials submitted by the Member;
(b) a meeting prior to the initial classroom visit to discuss the evaluation process and the Member’s teaching methodology; and
(c) attendance at the Member’s class to observe the CAS Member’s teaching. Subject to the mutual agreement of the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate, the evaluation may include more than one visit to the Member’s class, and/or more than one designate performing the evaluation. Where the professional development evaluation has been requested by the Member to assist in the performance of his/her teaching duties under Article 16, more than one meeting between the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her designate may be scheduled. Scheduling of additional visits and meetings shall be subject to the mutual agreement of the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/ her designate. For an Online Learning course, in lieu of a classroom visit, course materials, web sites and/or other components of the course shall be reviewed. reviewed. A Professional Development Evaluation is in addition to the Teaching Evaluations under Article 19.2, 19.3 and 19.4.
19.5.6 Upon completion of 19.5.4, the ▇▇▇▇ or designate conducting the evaluation shall discuss the Member’s performance with the Member, and following this meeting shall send a written report of the evaluation to the Member, and, in the case of evaluations undertaken for an assessment for seniority status under 13.6, copied to PTAC. In addition to assessing the Member’s performance, this report may make recommendations to assist the Member in the performance of his/her duties.
19.5.7 This report of a Professional Development Evaluation shall be consistent with the terms and conditions and academic criteria set out in this Agreement.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Collective Agreement
Professional Development Evaluation. 19.5.1 A Professional Development Evaluation may be initiated by the ▇▇▇▇, with the consent of the CAS Member, or by the Member. The purpose of such an evaluation is to provide a written evaluation of the Member’s teaching performance in order to assess the Member who is eligible for seniority status under 13.613.7, or to assist the Member in the performance of his/her their teaching duties under Article 16. Only those evaluations undertaken for an assessment for seniority status under 13.6 13.7 shall be placed in the Member’s Official File.
19.5.2 The CAS Member initiates a Professional Development Evaluation by writing to the ▇▇▇▇ stating the reason for the request and suggesting a time for the evaluation to take place.
19.5.3 The ▇▇▇▇ may choose a designate to perform the Professional Development Evaluation. The designate shall normally be from the academic unit or sub-unit, as appropriate, in which the course is offered, or from a cognate discipline, and shall not be a member of the PTAC that recommended the Professional Development Evaluation under Articles 13.6.2.6 13.7.2.6 and 13.6.2.713.7.2.7.
19.5.4 When the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her their designate initiates such an evaluation by writing to the Member stating the purpose of the evaluation and suggesting the time for an evaluation to take place, the evaluation and its scheduling shall be subject to the mutual agreement of the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her their designate.
19.5.5 The evaluation by the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her their designate shall include:
(a) : a review of the Member’s Official File and all materials submitted by the Member;
(b) ; a meeting prior to the initial classroom visit to discuss the evaluation process and the Member’s teaching methodology; and
(c) and attendance at the Member’s class to observe the CAS Member’s teaching. Subject to the mutual agreement of the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her their designate, the evaluation may include more than one (1) visit to the Member’s class, and/or more than one designate performing the evaluation. Where the professional development evaluation Professional Development Evaluation has been requested by the Member to assist in the performance of his/her their teaching duties under Article 16, more than one (1) meeting between the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/her their designate may be scheduled. Scheduling of additional visits and meetings shall be subject to the mutual agreement of the Member and the ▇▇▇▇ or his/ her their designate. For an Online Learning course, in lieu of a classroom visit, course materials, web sites websites and/or other components of the course shall be reviewed. A Professional Development Evaluation is in addition to the Teaching Evaluations under Article 19.2, 19.3 and 19.4.
19.5.6 Upon completion of 19.5.4, the ▇▇▇▇ or designate conducting the evaluation shall discuss the Member’s performance with the Member, and following this meeting shall send a written report of the evaluation to the Member, and, in the case of evaluations undertaken for an assessment for seniority status under 13.613.7, copied to the PTAC. In addition to assessing the Member’s performance, this report may make recommendations to assist the Member in the performance of his/her their duties.
19.5.7 This report of a Professional Development Evaluation shall be consistent with the terms and conditions and academic criteria set out in this Agreement.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Collective Agreement