Profitability Sample Clauses
The Profitability clause defines how the financial gains or losses from a contract or business arrangement are measured and allocated between the parties. Typically, it outlines the methods for calculating profits, the timing and frequency of profit assessments, and the distribution of profits or losses, such as through periodic reports or profit-sharing mechanisms. This clause ensures transparency and fairness in financial dealings, helping to prevent disputes by clearly establishing how profitability is determined and shared.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 4 times
Profitability. The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by ▇▇▇▇ under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs to ▇▇▇▇, and pre-tax profits realized by ▇▇▇▇, from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of DIMA and its affiliates with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. The Board and the Fee Consultant reviewed ▇▇▇▇’s methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Fund. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the pre-tax profits realized by ▇▇▇▇ in connection with the management of the Fund were not unreasonable. The Board also reviewed certain publicly available information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund’s investment management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Fund’s fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.
Profitability. The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by ▇▇▇▇ under the Agreements. The Board considered the estimated costs to ▇▇▇▇, and pre-tax profits realized by ▇▇▇▇, from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of DIMA and its affiliates with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. The Board and the Fee Consultant reviewed ▇▇▇▇’s methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Fund. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the pre-tax profits realized by ▇▇▇▇ in connection with the management of the Fund were not unreasonable. The Board also reviewed certain publicly available information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that, while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates’ overall profitability with respect to the DWS Funds (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by ▇▇▇▇ and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of most comparable firms for which such data was available. The Board did not consider the profitability of NTI with respect to the Portfolio. The Board noted that ▇▇▇▇ pays NTI’s fee out of its management fee, and its understanding that the Portfolio’s sub-advisory fee schedule was the product of an arm’s length negotiation with ▇▇▇▇.
Profitability. The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by ▇▇▇▇ under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs to ▇▇▇▇, and pre-tax profits realized by ▇▇▇▇, from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of DIMA and its affiliates with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. The Board and the Fee Consultant reviewed ▇▇▇▇’s methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Fund. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the pre-tax profits realized by ▇▇▇▇ in connection with the management of the Fund were not unreasonable. The Board also reviewed certain publicly available Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund’s investment management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Fund’s fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.
Profitability. Borrower shall not suffer a loss in excess of $7,500,000 for the fiscal quarter ending November 30, 1997 or a loss in excess of $2,000,000 for the fiscal quarter ending February 28, 1998. Borrower shall be profitable on an after tax basis for each fiscal quarter thereafter.
Profitability. The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by ▇▇▇▇ under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs to ▇▇▇▇, and pre-tax profits realized by ▇▇▇▇, from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of DIMA and its affiliates with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund’s investment management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Fund’s fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.
Profitability. The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by ▇▇▇▇ under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs to ▇▇▇▇, and pre-tax profits realized by ▇▇▇▇, from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund’s investment management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Fund’s fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.
Profitability. The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by ▇▇▇▇ under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs to ▇▇▇▇, and pre-tax profits realized by ▇▇▇▇, from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of DIMA and its affiliates with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund. The Board and the Fee Consultant reviewed ▇▇▇▇’s methodology in allocating its costs to the management of the Fund. Based on the information provided, the Board concluded that the pre-tax profits realized by ▇▇▇▇ in connection with the management of the Fund were not unreasonable. The Board also reviewed certain publicly available information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that, while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates’ overall profitability with respect to the DWS Funds (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by ▇▇▇▇ and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of most comparable firms for which such data was available. Economies of Scale. The Board considered whether there are economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund and whether the Fund benefits from any economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund’s investment management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Fund’s fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between the Fund and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Fund at current asset levels.
Profitability. The Board reviewed detailed information regarding revenues received by ▇▇▇▇ under the Agreement. The Board considered the estimated costs to ▇▇▇▇, and pre-tax profits realized by ▇▇▇▇, from advising the DWS Funds, as well as estimates of the pre-tax profits attributable to managing the Fund in particular. The Board also received information regarding the estimated enterprise-wide profitability of DIMA and its affiliates with respect to all fund services in totality and by fund.
Profitability. Subject to safety, liquidity and sound risk control, Party B shall fully utilize its advantages in scale and organization, strengthen the portfolio deployment and investment operation of the Entrusted Assets, and promote innovative investment so as to improve the profit level of the Entrusted Assets to the extent possible.
Profitability. Borrower will maintain a net profit, after provision for income taxes, of any positive amount for any two consecutive fiscal quarters, as reported at the end of each such fiscal quarter, and maintain a net profit, after provision for income taxes for its fiscal year end.