Progress Meeting Clause Samples
A Progress Meeting clause establishes the requirement for regular meetings between the parties involved in a project to review the status and progress of the work. Typically, this clause outlines how often meetings should occur, who should attend, and what topics or reports should be discussed, such as timelines, deliverables, and any issues encountered. Its core practical function is to facilitate ongoing communication, ensure alignment among stakeholders, and promptly address any problems or delays, thereby helping to keep the project on track.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 2 times
Progress Meeting. 9 Developer shall participate in monthly progress meetings or meetings held at the request of
Progress Meeting. FNI will meet with City staff to review the results of the draft criticality and condition analysis, solicit input on modifications to the scoring system, and conduct a preliminary discussion on rehabilitation decision tree engine.
Progress Meeting.
14 A. Developer shall make available the Project Manager and appropriate personnel to 15 participate in the monthly progress meetings.
16 B. Developer shall make and record an action item list that specifies who is responsible for 17 resolving existing or pending issues and the date by which the issue must be resolved to 18 avoid Project delays.
19 C. Developer shall make available the Safety Manager.
Progress Meeting. 7 Developer shall participate in monthly progress meetings or meetings held at the request of 8 ADOT to review and discuss the status of the Project. In the meetings, the Parties will address 9 the causes, responsible party, impacts, and potential solutions to all issues identified with the 10 intent of finding the most effective solutions to problems through the following:
11 A. Developer shall make available the Project Manager and appropriate personnel to 12 participate in the monthly progress meetings.
13 B. Developer shall make and record an action item list that specifies who is responsible for 14 resolving existing or pending issues and the date by which the issue must be resolved to 15 avoid Project delays.
16 C. Developer shall make available the Safety Manager. 17 110.02.3 Pre-Design Coordination Meetings 18 Developer shall schedule a pre-design coordination meeting with ADOT to familiarize the 19 designers and ADOT’s review personnel with the design concepts, issues, status, and review 20 procedures. Developer shall conduct a pre-design coordination meeting no later than 1) 10 21 Business Days prior to any Design Work associated with NTP 1 or 2) issuance of NTP 2.
Progress Meeting. 6.1 The CITY’S designated Project Manager may request periodic progress briefings during the term of this Agreement.
Progress Meeting. Students joining the Joint Masters Program will follow Home Institute regulations for monitoring their progress.
Progress Meeting. The Consultant will assist the Client in establishing an ADA Liaison Committee that will meet throughout the process of completing the Self-Evaluation and developing the Transition Plan and will continue to meet and actively participate after the completion of this project. The Consultant will work with the ADA Liaison Committee throughout the duration of the project to receive feedback and incorporate information from the ADA Liaison Committee into the project. The Consultant will prepare for and attend up to one (1) in-person progress meetings with Client staff and the newly created ADA Liaison Committee. The Consultant will produce meeting materials and handouts and prepare meeting notes, including a summary of action items resulting from the meetings (2-hour meeting).
Progress Meeting. 6.1 The CITY’S designated Project Manager may hold periodic meetings on a monthly basis, or more frequently, if required, during the term of this Agreement. The CONTRACTOR’S Project Manager and all other appropriate personnel shall attend such meetings as designated by the CITY’S Project Manager.
Progress Meeting. Research Progress for Year 1: Presentation Title Scientific Content E xcellent Good Fair Unsatisfactory Quality of Presentation E xcellent Good Fair Unsatisfactory Ability to Explain Project E xcellent Good Fair Unsatisfactory Number of questions asked Ability to answer questions E xcellent Good Fair Unsatisfactory Does the supervisor assess that the scientific talk is a fair reflection of the research that the student has achieved in Year 1? Making good progress and may proceed to Year 2 of the PhD/DSc programme Progress is lacking in some areas; may proceed to Year 2 of the PhD/DSc programme, but additional training and courses must be taken. Unsatisfactory progress; PhD - may not proceed to Year 2 of the Ph.D programme, but may transfer to the MSc programme. Very poor progress; PhD - may not proceed to Year 2 of the Ph.D or to the ▇.▇▇. Programme.
Progress Meeting. Gate review Meetings