PROPERTY ALLOCATION Clause Samples

POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
PROPERTY ALLOCATION. Sellers and Purchaser agree that, prior to each Closing, the Allocated Purchase Price for each individual Hotel Asset purchased as part of such Closing shall be allocated for federal, state and local Tax purposes (the “Allocation”) among the applicable portion of (i) the Real Property, (ii) the Improvements, and (iii) the Personal Property as may be determined by agreement of Seller and Purchaser in accordance with Section 1060 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). At least 30 days prior to each Closing, Purchaser shall prepare and deliver to Sellers a draft of the Allocation setting forth its proposed calculation of the aggregate amount of the Allocated Purchase Price to be allocated among the applicable portions of each Hotel Asset sold pursuant to such Closing. If within 10 days after their receipt of the draft of the Allocation Sellers have not objected in writing to such draft allocation, it shall become final. In the event that Sellers object in writing within such 10-day period, Sellers and Purchaser shall negotiate in good faith to resolve the dispute. Upon reaching an agreement on the Allocation, Purchaser and Sellers shall (i) cooperate in the filing of any forms (including Form 8594 or Form 8824 under Section 1060 of the Code) with respect to the agreed Allocation, including any amendments to such forms required pursuant to this Agreement with respect to any adjustment to the Purchase Price, and (ii) shall file all federal, state and local Tax returns and related Tax documents consistent with the agreed Allocation, as the same may be adjusted pursuant to any provisions of this Agreement, unless otherwise required pursuant to a “determination” within the meaning of Section 1313(a) of the Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if, after negotiating in good faith, Purchaser and Sellers are unable to agree on a mutually satisfactory Allocation, each Purchaser and Sellers shall use its or their own allocation for purposes of this Section 2.3.
PROPERTY ALLOCATION. A. The State Shall: Provide the LESO website that will afford timely and accurate guidance, information, and links for all LEAs who work, or have an interest in, the LESO Program.
PROPERTY ALLOCATION a) The LESO shall: i) Upon receipt of a SC/SPOC validated request for property through the RTD website, will review and give preference to requisitions indicating that the requested property will be used in the counter-drug, counter-terrorism, disaster-related emergency preparedness, or border security activities of the requesting LEA. Program participants that request vehicles used for disaster-related emergency preparedness, such as high-water rescue vehicles, should receive the highest preference. ii) Require additional justification for small arms, aircraft, ammunition, and vehicles and to the greatest extent possible, ensure fair and equitable distribution of property based on current LEA inventory and justification for property. iii) Reserve the right to determine and/or adjust allocation limits, to include the type, quantity and location of property allocated to the State/LEA. Generally, no more than one item (per part-time/full-time officer) will be allocated. Quantity exceptions may be granted by the LESO on a case-by-case basis based on the justification provided by the LEA. Currently, the following allocation limits apply: (1) Robots: one (of each type) for every ten officers (full-time/part-time). (2) High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV)/Up-Armored HMMWV (UAH): one vehicle for every three officers (full-time/part-time). (3) Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) / Armored Vehicles: two vehicles per LEA. (4) Small arms: one (of each type) per officer (full-time/part-time). (a) LESO may authorize over allocations of small arms in preparation for inevitable scenarios, i.e. training, equipment downtime (damage, routine maintenance, inspections) or other law enforcement needs. The chart below is the standard for small arms acceptable over-allocations: 1-10 2 or less 11-25 3 or less 26-100 5 or less 101-299 8 or less 300 or more 10 or less (b) In instances where small arm allocation amounts exceed the “acceptable over-allocation” levels, the LESO will coordinate with States to verify accuracy of the officer count. If small arm allocation is still beyond acceptable levels, LESO may authorize one of the following: 1) an exception to policy, 2) a transfer, or 3) a turn-in.
PROPERTY ALLOCATION. A. The State Shall: 1) Upon receipt of a valid LEA request for property through the DLA Disposition Services RTD Website, give a preference to those requisitions indicating that the transferred property will be used in the counter-drug/counter-terrorism or border security activities of the recipient agency. Additionally, to the greatest extent possible, the State will ensure fair and equitable distribution of property based on current LEA inventory and LEA justifications for property. 2) The State and the LESO reserves the right to determine and/or adjust allocation limits. Generally, no more than one of any item per officer will be allocated. Quantity exceptions may be granted on a case-by-case basis by the LESO based on the justification provided by the LEA. Currently, the following allocation limits apply: a) Small Arms: one (1) of each type for every qualified officer, full-time/part- time; b) HMMWVs/Up-Armored HMMWVs: one (1) vehicle for every three (3) officers; c) MRAPs/Armored Vehicles: two (2) vehicles per LEA; d) Robots: one (1) of each type for every twenty five (25) officers 3) Additional justification may be required for small arms and armored vehicles. The LESO reserves final authority on determining the approval and/or disapproval for requests of specific types and quantities of excess DoD property. 4) Access the DLA Disposition Services RTD Website at a minimum of once daily (Monday - Friday) to review/process LEAs’ requests for excess DoD property. B. The LEA shall: 1) Ensure an appropriate justification is submitted when requesting excess DoD property via the DLA Disposition Services RTD Website. 2) Access the LESO website for timely and accurate guidance, information, and links concerning the LESO Program and ensure that all relevant information is reviewed. 3) When requesting property for counter-drug/counter-terrorism or border security activities, provide a justification that specifies that the property will be used for such activities. 4) Maintain access to FEPMIS to ensure the LEA is properly maintaining their property books, to include, but not limited to, transfers, turn-ins, and disposal requests. a) FEPMIS account holders must be employees of the LEA.
PROPERTY ALLOCATION. A. The State Shall: 1) Provide the LESO website that will afford timely and accurate guidance, information, and links for all LEAs who work, or have an interest in, the LESO Program. 2) Upon receipt of a valid State / LEA request for property through the DLA Disposition Services RTD website, a preference will be given to those applications indicating that the transferred property will be used in the counter-drug, counter- terrorism, or border security activities of the recipient agency. Additionally, to the greatest extent possible, the State will ensure fair and equitable distribution of property based on current LEAs inventory and justification for property. 3) The State and the LESO reserve the right to determine and/or adjust allocation limits. Generally, no more than one of any item per officer will be allocated to an LEA. Quantity exceptions may be granted on a case-by-case basis by the LESO. Currently, the following quantity limits apply: a. S mall Arms: one (1) type for each qualified officer, full-time / part-time; b. HMMWVs: one (1) vehicle for every three (3) officers;
PROPERTY ALLOCATION. Seller and Purchaser agree that, prior to Closing, the Allocated Purchase Price and the Allocated Loan Amount (as such term is defined in the Loan Agreement) of the Assumed Debt for each individual Hotel Asset shall be allocated for federal, state and local tax purposes among the applicable portion of (i) the Real Property, (ii) the Improvements, and (iii) the Personal Property as may be determined by agreement of Seller and Purchaser in accordance with Section 1060 of the Code. The Allocated Purchase Price (and any other items that are required for federal income tax purposes to be treated as part of each Allocated Purchase Price) as agreed between Sellers and Purchaser is set forth on Schedule 2 hereto (the “Final Allocation”). Purchaser and Seller shall (i) cooperate in the filing of any forms (including Form 8594 under Section 1060 of the Code) with respect to such Final Allocation, including any amendments to such forms required pursuant to this Agreement with respect to any adjustment to the Purchase Price, and (ii) shall file all federal, state and local tax returns and related tax documents consistent with such Final Allocation, as the same may be adjusted pursuant to any provisions of this Agreement.
PROPERTY ALLOCATION a) The LESO shall: i) Upon receipt of a SC/SPOC validated request for property through the RTD website, will review and give preference to requisitions indicating that the requested prope1ty will be used in the counter-drug, counter-terrorism, disaster-related emergency preparedness, or border security activities of the requesting LEA. Program participants that request vehicles used for disaster-related emergency preparedness, such as high-water rescue vehicles, should receive the highest preference. ii) Require additional justification for small arms, aircraft, ammunition, and vehicles and to the greatest extent possible, ensure fair and equitable distribution of prope1ty based on current LEA inventory and justification for property. iii) Reserve the right to determine and/or adjust allocation limits, to include the type, quantity and location of property allocated to the State/LEA. Generally, no more than one item (per part-time/full-time officer) will be allocated. Quantity exceptions may be granted by the LESO on a case-by-case basis based on the justification provided by the LEA. Currently, the following allocation limits apply: (I) Robots: one (of each type) for every ten officers (full-time/▇▇▇▇-time).

Related to PROPERTY ALLOCATION

  • Regulatory Allocations The following allocations shall be made in the following order: (a) Nonrecourse Deductions shall be allocated to the Members in accordance with their respective Sharing Percentages. (b) Member Nonrecourse Deductions attributable to Member Nonrecourse Debt shall be allocated to the Members bearing the Economic Risk of Loss for such Member Nonrecourse Debt as determined under Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-2(b)(4). If more than one Member bears the Economic Risk of Loss for such Member Nonrecourse Debt, the Member Nonrecourse Deductions attributable to such Member Nonrecourse Debt shall be allocated among the Members according to the ratio in which they bear the Economic Risk of Loss. This Section 5.04(b) is intended to comply with the provisions of Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-2(i) and shall be interpreted consistently therewith. (c) Notwithstanding any other provision hereof to the contrary, if there is a net decrease in Minimum Gain for a Fiscal Year (or if there was a net decrease in Minimum Gain for a prior Fiscal Year and the Company did not have sufficient amounts of income and gain during prior years to allocate among the Members under this Section 5.04(c), items of income and gain shall be allocated to each Member in an amount equal to such Member’s share of the net decrease in such Minimum Gain (as determined pursuant to Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-2(g)(2)). This Section 5.04(c) is intended to constitute a minimum gain chargeback under Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-2(f) and shall be interpreted consistently therewith. (d) Notwithstanding any provision hereof to the contrary except Section 5.04(c) (dealing with Minimum Gain), if there is a net decrease in Member Nonrecourse Debt Minimum Gain for a Fiscal Year (or if there was a net decrease in Member Nonrecourse Debt Minimum Gain for a prior Fiscal Year and the Company did not have sufficient amounts of income and gain during prior years to allocate among the Members under this Section 5.04(d), items of income and gain shall be allocated to each Member in an amount equal to such Member’s share of the net decrease in Member Nonrecourse Debt Minimum Gain (as determined pursuant to Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-2(i)(4)). This Section 5.04(d) is intended to constitute a partner nonrecourse debt minimum gain chargeback under Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-2(i)(4) and shall be interpreted consistently therewith. (e) Notwithstanding any provision hereof to the contrary except Sections 5.04(c) and Section 5.04(d) (dealing with Minimum Gain and Member Nonrecourse Debt Minimum Gain), a Member who unexpectedly receives an adjustment, allocation or distribution described in Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(d)(4), (5) or (6) shall be allocated items of income and gain (consisting of a pro rata portion of each item of income, including gross income, and gain for the Fiscal Year) in an amount and manner sufficient to eliminate any deficit balance in such Member’s Adjusted Capital Account as quickly as possible. This Section 5.04(e) is intended to constitute a qualified income offset under Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(d) and shall be interpreted consistently therewith. (f) In the event that any Member has a negative Adjusted Capital Account at the end of any Fiscal Year, such Member shall be allocated items of Company income and gain in the amount of such deficit as quickly as possible; provided that an allocation pursuant to this Section 5.04(f) shall be made only if and to the extent that such Member would have a negative Adjusted Capital Account after all other allocations provided for in this Section 5.04 have been tentatively made as if this Section 5.04(f) were not in this Agreement. (g) To the extent an adjustment to the adjusted tax basis of any Company properties pursuant to Code Section 734(b) or Code Section 743(b) is required pursuant to Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv)(m)(2) or 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv)(m)(4) to be taken into account in determining Capital Accounts as the result of a distribution to any Member in complete liquidation of such Member’s Membership Interest, the amount of such adjustment to Capital Accounts shall be treated as an item of gain (if the adjustment increases the basis of the asset) or loss (if the adjustment decreases such basis) and such gain or loss shall be allocated to the Members in accordance with Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv)(m)(2) if such Section applies, or to the Member to whom such distribution was made if Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv)(m)(4) applies.