Quality Assurance and Evaluation Mechanism Sample Clauses

The Quality Assurance and Evaluation Mechanism clause establishes the standards and procedures for monitoring and assessing the quality of goods or services provided under an agreement. Typically, this clause outlines the criteria for quality, the methods for evaluation—such as inspections, audits, or performance reviews—and the frequency or timing of these assessments. Its core practical function is to ensure that deliverables consistently meet agreed-upon standards, thereby reducing the risk of subpar performance and providing a clear process for addressing quality issues if they arise.
Quality Assurance and Evaluation Mechanism. The Project Implementation Agency (PIA) shall be solely responsible & accountable for assuring quality in Integrated Power Development Scheme (IPDS) works. Project Implementing Agency (PIA) shall formulate a detailed comprehensive Quality Assurance (QA) plan for the works to be carried out under IPDS scheme with an objective to create quality infrastructure works. The QA and Inspection Plan shall be integral part of the contract agreement with turnkey contractor or equipment supplier and erection agency as the case may be in case of turnkey/ or departmental execution of works. PIA has to ensure that the quality of materials/equipment supplied at site and execution of works carried out at field under IPDS scheme is in accordance to Manufacturing Quality Plan (MQP)/Guaranteed Technical Particulars (GTP) and Field Quality Plan (FQP)/Approved Drawings/Data Sheets respectively. 2.1. Quality checks to be ensured by PIA/Turnkey Contractor: a. 100% pre-dispatch inspections of all materials viz. as per MQP/ Approved Drawings/ Technical Specifications/Datasheet/GTP/applicable national & international standards. b. 100% villages with all infrastructures are to be verified for quality as per MQP/Datasheet/GTP/ Approved Drawings/Technical Specifications and FQP. c. 100% of all 66/11 or 33/11 kV sub stations (New & Augmented) for quality of material as per MQP/Approved Drawings/Technical Specifications/Datasheet/GTP and erection works in the field as per FQP/approved survey drawings/layout. d. 100% verification of BPL HHs connections released. e. 100% verifications feeders created under the scheme. f. 100% verification of materials utilised under the scheme. g. 100% verification of works done in Metering, SAGY & System Strengthening. Also, PIA & Turnkey Contractor have to carry out quality assurance of village electrification and substation works as per the checklist provided at Annexure-A.

Related to Quality Assurance and Evaluation Mechanism

  • Quality Assurance The parties endorse the underlying principles of the Company’s Quality Management System, which seeks to ensure that its services are provided in a manner which best conforms to the requirements of the contract with its customer. This requires the Company to establish and maintain, implement, train and continuously improve its procedures and processes, and the employees to follow the procedures, document their compliance and participate in the improvement process. In particular, this will require employees to regularly and reliably fill out documentation and checklists to signify that work has been carried out in accordance with the customer’s specific requirements. Where necessary, training will be provided in these activities.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Monitoring and Evaluation a. The AGENCY shall expeditiously provide to the COUNTY upon request, all data needed for the purpose of monitoring, evaluating and/or auditing the program(s). This data shall include, but not be limited to, clients served, services provided, outcomes achieved, information on materials and services delivered, and any other data required, in the sole discretion of the COUNTY, that may be required to adequately monitor and evaluate the services provided under this Contract. Monitoring shall be performed in accordance with COUNTY’S established Noncompliance Standards, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment “C”. b. The AGENCY agrees to permit persons duly authorized by the COUNTY to interview any clients and all current and/or former employees of the AGENCY to be assured of the AGENCY’S satisfactory performance of the terms of this Contract. c. Following such evaluation, monitoring, and/or audit, the COUNTY will deliver a report of its findings and recommendations with regard to the AGENCY’S conformance with this Contract’s terms and conditions to the AGENCY and/or Board of Directors’ President, and members, whenever applicable. If deficiencies are noted, a written notice of corrective action will be issued to the AGENCY which will specify deficiencies and provide a timeline for correction of those deficiencies. Within the designated timeframe in the written notice of corrective action, the AGENCY shall submit to the COUNTY’S CCC manager (“Manager”), or their designee, a corrective action plan to rectify all deficiencies identified by the COUNTY. d. Failure by the AGENCY to correct noted deficiencies, as outlined in the written notice of corrective action, may result in the AGENCY being deemed in breach of the Contract terms. e. The AGENCY shall cooperate with the COUNTY on all reviews to ensure compliance with all applicable COUNTY guidelines and requirements for general fund recipients.