Quality Assurance and Monitoring Clause Samples

Quality Assurance and Monitoring. The state will monitor AAAs for adherence to policies applicable to presumptive eligibility determinations through contract monitoring and quality assurance reviews. (1) Post implementation the state will conduct a targeted review of implementation to validate PE determinations are being made in accordance with established criteria; and (2) As part of the state’s Quality Improvement Strategy, a sample of PE determinations will be reviewed yearly to determine that PE was established appropriately. The state must report to CMS all participants who were found presumptively eligible initially, then later determined not eligible.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Quality Assurance and Monitoring. The Grantee must submit a Quality Assurance Plan that documents the processes for monitoring the quality of services provided by I&R staff, as well as the integrity of database resource listings. The plan must also include the process by which individuals seeking assistance from the AIC can provide feedback about the services they received. While some of this information can be collected during customer satisfaction/quality assurance follow-up contacts conducted by the AIC, there must also be a process for tracking customer-initiated feedback and any complaints reported. The Quality Assurance Plan is a dynamic plan subject to reviews and updates frequently by the Grantee and System Agency. It must also be available to authorized System Agency staff at all times. The Grantee must provide the Quality Assurance Plan during the following deliverable periods: A. Submit an initial Quality Assurance Plan, 45 calendar days prior to the scheduled operational start date, or as directed by System Agency.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Quality Assurance and Monitoring. PHC CCS Program PHC shall participate, at a minimum, in quarterly meetings with the county CCS Program to collaborate and discuss CCS and MTP specific P&Ps and protocols. Documentation should be available for auditing purposes, including agenda, sign-in sheets, etc. Meeting facilitation to be determined by PHC and local CCS Program. Siskiyou County shall participate, at a minimum, in quarterly meetings with the PHC to collaborate and discuss CCS and MTP specific P&Ps and protocols. Documentation should be available for auditing purposes, including agenda, sign-in sheets, etc. Meeting facilitation to be determined by PHC and local CCS Program.
View Source
Quality Assurance and Monitoring. MCC Funding under this Sub-Activity will support the creation of a quality assurance team at the Center of Excellence. This team will facilitate the ongoing evidence-based improvement and oversight of the Center of Excellence’s programs by developing evaluation tools to regularly analyze and report on the effectiveness of trainings. These tools, including online surveys and assessment tasks, will allow for collection and analysis of data gathered from trainees after they have completed individual modules and the full program. Data and analysis will support the Center of Excellence’s continuous improvement of courses, teaching styles, and learning materials, as well as its responsiveness to emerging needs that prompt new courses, components, or modules.
View Source
Quality Assurance and Monitoring 
View Source

Related to Quality Assurance and Monitoring

  • Quality Assurance The parties endorse the underlying principles of the Company’s Quality Management System, which seeks to ensure that its services are provided in a manner which best conforms to the requirements of the contract with its customer. This requires the Company to establish and maintain, implement, train and continuously improve its procedures and processes, and the employees to follow the procedures, document their compliance and participate in the improvement process. In particular, this will require employees to regularly and reliably fill out documentation and checklists to signify that work has been carried out in accordance with the customer’s specific requirements. Where necessary, training will be provided in these activities.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

  • Quality Assurance Requirements There are no special Quality Assurance requirements under this Agreement.

  • Reporting and Monitoring Please provide a brief description of the mechanisms proposed for this project for reporting to the UNDP and partners, including a reporting schedule.