RANKING OF AWARDED RESOURCES FOR DISPATCH PRIORITY Clause Samples

RANKING OF AWARDED RESOURCES FOR DISPATCH PRIORITY. (a) All resources will be evaluated and agreements will be awarded in accordance with B.3. Resources on an awarded Agreement will be ranked on a dispatch priority list by Host Forest Dispatch Center. As described in B.6, socioeconomic status advantage will be given to those small business concerns identified in Block 10 of the SF-1449. (b) In addition to the award evaluation factors in B.3, criteria have been developed for some categories of equipment to assess the advantages for dispatch priority. If no additional criteria are identified, lowest price awarded resources will be ranked highest on the dispatch list. .
View SourceView Similar (6)
RANKING OF AWARDED RESOURCES FOR DISPATCH PRIORITY. (a) All resources will be evaluated and agreements will be awarded in accordance with B.3. Resources on an awarded Agreement will be ranked on a dispatch priority list by Geographic Area Coordination Center - Northern Operations (CA-ONCC) and Southern Operations (CA-OSCC). As described in B.6, socioeconomic status advantage will be given to those small business concerns identified in Block 10 of the SF-1449. (b) In addition to the award evaluation factors in B.3, criteria have been developed for some categories of equipment to assess the advantages for dispatch priority. If no additional criteria are identified, lowest price awarded resources will be ranked highest on the dispatch list. .
View SourceView Similar (2)
RANKING OF AWARDED RESOURCES FOR DISPATCH PRIORITY. (a) All resources will be evaluated and agreements will be awarded in accordance with B.3. Resources on an awarded Agreement will be ranked on a dispatch priority list by Geographic Area Coordination Center - Northern Operations (CA-ONCC) and Southern Operations (CA-OSCC) . As described in B.6, socioeconomic status advantage will be given to those small business concerns identified in Block 10 of the SF-1449. (b) In addition to the award evaluation factors in B.3, criteria have been developed for some categories of equipment to assess the advantages for dispatch priority. If no additional criteria are identified, lowest price awarded resources will be ranked highest on the dispatch list. . (c) Within each small business program category, priority will be given according to the price offered for the type of resource. The price will be based on the daily rate offered, with the lowest price being ranked highest on the dispatch list: Daily Rate. 6.2.1 Tied Prices/CBA Scores. The following methodology will be used to break ties that result when determining the ranking for the dispatch priority list. Preference will be given to those small businesses that are also labor surplus area (LSA) concerns. Any ties remaining among LSA concerns will be resolved using programmatically driven random ranking within the VIPR system. This functionality will also be used to resolve any ties that occur among non-LSA concerns. .
View SourceView Similar (2)
RANKING OF AWARDED RESOURCES FOR DISPATCH PRIORITY. (a) All resources will be evaluated and agreements will be awarded in accordance with B.3. Resources on an awarded Agreement will be ranked on a dispatch priority list by Note: Agreements from this solicitation will potentially be awarded only at the following host dispatch locations by Region:
View Source
RANKING OF AWARDED RESOURCES FOR DISPATCH PRIORITY. All resources on an awarded Agreement will be ranked on a dispatch priority list by <STARTEDIT> Host Dispatch Zone or Geographic Area <ENDEDIT>. Priority will be given to those small business concerns identified in Section B, Method of Award - Cascading Set-Aside Procedure. Within each small business program category, priority will be given according to the price offered for the type of resource. The following calculation will be used to determine the lowest price, with the lowest price being ranked highest on the dispatch list: (((Daily Rate + Weekly Rate)/8)x0.7) + ((Monthly Rate/30)x0.3). Only the rate for the portable toilets will be included in the calculation. Handwashing Stations, wheelchair accessible units, mileage, service calls, and reset fee will not be considered in the calculation. One priority list will be generated for portable toilets, wheelchair accessible portable toilets, and portable handwashing stations. Contracting Officers will determine price reasonableness for the wheelchair accessible portable toilets, portable handwashing stations, mileage, service calls, and reset fees. D.6.2.1 TIED PRICES/CBA SCORES The following methodology will be used to break ties that result when determining the ranking for the dispatch priority list. Preference will be given to those small businesses that are also labor surplus area (LSA) concerns. Any ties remaining among LSA concerns will be resolved using programmatically driven random ranking within the VIPR system. This functionality will also be used to resolve any ties that occur among non-LSA concerns.
View Source
RANKING OF AWARDED RESOURCES FOR DISPATCH PRIORITY. (a) All resources will be evaluated and agreements will be awarded in accordance with B.3. Resources on an awarded Agreement will be ranked on a dispatch priority list by Host Dispatch Zone or Geographic Area: Note: Agreements from this solicitation will potentially be awarded only at the following host dispatch locations by Region: Region 1: None, no Clerical Support Trailer resources will be hosted within this Region. Region 2: Any Dispatch Center excluding the GACC (Geographic Area Coordination Center) CORMACC (Rocky Mountain Area Cordination Center) Lakewood, CO.
View Source
RANKING OF AWARDED RESOURCES FOR DISPATCH PRIORITY. All resources on an awarded Agreement will be ranked on a dispatch priority list by Host Dispatch Zone or Geographic Area . Priority will be given to those small business concerns identified in Section B, Method of Award - Cascading Set-Aside procedure. Within each small business program category, priority will be given according to the lowest price using the following calculation considering both the daily rate and cost per copy offered (see calculation below), with the lowest price being ranked highest on the dispatch list. Plotted sheets, laminating, faxing, and binding will not be included in the calculation. Black and White: (8 ½” X 11” (cost/copy) x 70%) + (11” X 17” (cost/copy) x 30%) X 95% Color: (8 ½” X 11” (cost/copy) x 70%) + (11” X 17” (cost/copy) x 30%) X 5% Black and White + Color = Score Price (calculation for placement on dispatch priority list) = (Score x 1000 x 70%) + (Daily Rate x 30%) Attribute, not given points
View Source
RANKING OF AWARDED RESOURCES FOR DISPATCH PRIORITY. (a) All resources will be evaluated and agreements will be awarded in accordance with B.3. Resources on an awarded Agreement will be ranked on a dispatch priority list by [ID-CDC] Coeur d'Alene Interagency Dispatch Center 1 [ID-GVC] Grangeville Interagency Dispatch Center 1 [MT-BDC] Billings Dispatch Center 1 [MT-BRC] Bitterroot Dispatch Center 1 [MT-BZC] Bozeman Interagency Dispatch Center 1 [MT-DDC] ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Dispatch Center 1 [MT-GDC] Great Falls Dispatch Center 1 [MT-HDC] Helena Interagency Dispatch Center 1 [MT-KDC] Kootenai Interagency Dispatch Center 1 [MT-KIC] Kalispell Interagency Dispatch Center 1 [MT-LEC] Lewistown Interagency Dispatch Center 1 [MT-MCC] Miles City Dispatch Center 1 [MT-MDC] Missoula Interagency Dispatch Center 1 [ND-NDC] North Dakota Dispatch Center 1 [CO-FTC] Fort ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Interagency Dispatch Center 2 [CO-PBC] Pueblo Interagency Dispatch Center 2 [SD-GPC] Great Plains Interagency Dispatch Center 2 [AZ-FDC] Flagstaff Interagency Dispatch Center 3 [AZ-PDC] Prescott Interagency Dispatch Center 3 [AZ-PHC] Phoenix Interagency Dispatch Center 3 [AZ-SDC] Show Low Interagency Dispatch Center 3 [AZ-WDC] ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Interagency Dispatch Center 3 [NM-ABC] Albuquerque Interagency Dispatch Center 3 [NM-ADC] Alamogordo Interagency Dispatch Center 3 [NM-SFC] Santa Fe Interagency Dispatch Center 3 [ID-BDC] Boise Interagency Logistics Center 4 [ID-CIC] Central Idaho Interagency Fire Center 4 [ID-EIC] Eastern Idaho Interagency Fire Center 4 [ID-PAC] ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ National Forest Dispatch 4 [NV-CNC] Central Nevada Interagency Dispatch Center 4 [NV-ECC] Ely Interagency Communication Center 4 [NV-EIC] Elko Interagency Dispatch Center 4 [NV-LIC] Las Vegas Interagency Communications Center 4 [NV-SFC] Sierra Front Interagency Dispatch Center 4 [UT-CDC] Color Country Interagency Fire Center 4 [UT-MFC] Moab Interagency Fire Center 4 [UT-NUC] Northern Utah Interagency Fire Center 4 [UT-RFC] Richfield Interagency Fire Center 4 [CA-ANCC] Angeles Communications Center 5 [CA-CCCC] Central California Communications Center 5 [CA-CICC] Camino Interagency ECC 5 [CA-FICC] Fortuna Interagency ECC 5 [CA-GVCC] Grass Valley Interagency ECC 5 [CA-LPCC] Los Padres Communications Center 5 [CA-MICC] Modoc Interagency ECC 5 [CA-MNFC] Mendocino National Forest Communication Center 5 [CA-OVCC] ▇▇▇▇▇ Valley Interagency Communications Center 5 [CA-PNFC] Plumas National Forest Communication Center 5 [CA-RICC] Redding Interagency ECC 5 [CA-SBCC] San Bernardino Interagency Communications Ce...
View Source

Related to RANKING OF AWARDED RESOURCES FOR DISPATCH PRIORITY

  • Provision for Supplemental Indentures for Certain Purposes From time to time the Company (if properly authorized by its directors) and the Warrant Agent may, subject to the provisions hereof, and they shall, when so directed in accordance with the provisions hereof, execute and deliver by their proper officers, indentures or instruments supplemental hereto, which thereafter shall form part hereof, for any one or more or all of the following purposes: (a) providing for the issuance of additional Warrants hereunder including Warrants in excess of the number set out in Section 2.1 and any consequential amendments hereto as may be required by the Warrant Agent, relying on the advice of counsel; (b) setting forth adjustments in the application of Article 2; (c) adding to the provisions hereof such additional covenants and enforcement provisions as, in the opinion of counsel are necessary or advisable, provided that the same are not in the opinion of the Warrant Agent, relying on the advice of counsel, prejudicial to the interests of the Warrantholders as a group; (d) giving effect to any extraordinary resolution passed as provided in Article 6; (e) making such provisions not inconsistent with this Indenture as may be necessary or desirable with respect to matters or questions arising hereunder provided that such provisions are not, in the opinion of the Warrant Agent, relying on the advice of counsel, prejudicial to the interests of the Warrantholders as a group; (f) adding to or amending the provisions hereof in respect of the transfer of Warrants, making provision for the exchange of Warrants and making any modification in the form of the Warrant Certificate that does not affect the substance thereof; (g) amending any of the provisions of this Indenture or relieving the Company from any of the obligations, conditions or restrictions herein contained, provided that no such amendment or relief shall be or become operative or effective if, in the opinion of the Warrant Agent, relying on the advice of counsel, such amendment or relief impairs any of the rights of the Warrantholders as a group or of the Warrant Agent, and provided further that the Warrant Agent may in its sole discretion decline to enter into any supplemental indenture that in its opinion may not afford adequate protection to the Warrant Agent when the same shall become operative; and (h) for any other purpose not inconsistent with the terms of this Indenture, including the correction or rectification of any ambiguities, defective or inconsistent provisions, errors or omissions herein, provided that, in the opinion of the Warrant Agent, relying on the advice of counsel, the rights of the Warrant Agent and the Warrantholders as a group are in no way prejudiced thereby.

  • Particular Methods of Procurement of Consultants’ Services 1. Quality- and Cost-based Selection. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph 2 below, consultants’ services shall be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of Quality and Cost-based Selection.

  • REQUIRED FOR PART 2 JOC - PRICING OF Regular Hours Coefficient What is your regular hours coefficient for the RS Means Price Book? (FAILURE TO RESPOND PROHIBITS PART 2 JOC EVALUATION)

  • Recognition of U.S. Special Resolution Regimes (a) In the event a Covered Party becomes subject to a proceeding under a U.S. Special Resolution Regime, the transfer of this Agreement (and any interest and obligation in or under, and any property securing, this Agreement) from such Covered Party will be effective to the same extent as the transfer would be effective under the U.S. Special Resolution Regime if this Agreement (and any interest and obligation in or under, and any property securing, this Agreement) were governed by the laws of the United States of America or a State of the United States of America. (b) In the event that a Covered Party or any BHC Affiliate of such Covered Party becomes subject to a proceeding under a U.S. Special Resolution Regime, any Default Right under this Agreement that may be exercised against such Covered Party is permitted to be exercised to no greater extent than such Default Right could be exercised under the U.S. Special Resolution Regime if this Agreement were governed by the laws of the United States of America or a State of the United States of America.

  • Repayment of Amounts Advanced for Network Upgrades Upon the Commercial Operation Date, the Interconnection Customer shall be entitled to a repayment, equal to the total amount paid to the Participating TO for the cost of Network Upgrades. Such amount shall include any tax gross-up or other tax-related payments associated with Network Upgrades not refunded to the Interconnection Customer, and shall be paid to the Interconnection Customer by the Participating TO on a dollar-for- dollar basis either through (1) direct payments made on a levelized basis over the five- year period commencing on the Commercial Operation Date; or (2) any alternative payment schedule that is mutually agreeable to the Interconnection Customer and Participating TO, provided that such amount is paid within five (5) years from the Commercial Operation Date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if this Agreement terminates within five (5) years from the Commercial Operation Date, the Participating TO’s obligation to pay refunds to the Interconnection Customer shall cease as of the date of termination. Any repayment shall include interest calculated in accordance with the methodology set forth in FERC’s regulations at 18 C.F.R. §35.19a(a)(2)(iii) from the date of any payment for Network Upgrades through the date on which the Interconnection Customer receives a repayment of such payment. Interest shall continue to accrue on the repayment obligation so long as this Agreement is in effect. The Interconnection Customer may assign such repayment rights to any person. If the Small Generating Facility fails to achieve commercial operation, but it or another Generating Facility is later constructed and makes use of the Network Upgrades, the Participating TO shall at that time reimburse Interconnection Customer for the amounts advanced for the Network Upgrades. Before any such reimbursement can occur, the Interconnection Customer, or the entity that ultimately constructs the Generating Facility, if different, is responsible for identifying the entity to which reimbursement must be made.