Record of Evaluation Clause Samples

Record of Evaluation. The parties agree that an effective evaluation process requires meaningful, ongoing, two-way communication. To facilitate this process, the parties agree that each educator shall have a record of evaluation maintained as part of his/her personnel file, pursuant to Article VI. All evaluation documents shall remain confidential as personnel records of each member of the bargaining unit. Each educator’s record of evaluation shall consist of three parts: 1) all forms and documents used or contained in the evaluation process; 2) evaluator-supplied evidence; and 3) educator-supplied evidence. Standard forms shall include all relevant forms in Appendix C-1. The other components are described below.
View SourceView Similar (7)
Record of Evaluation. Documented collection of evidence pertaining to the Educator’s performance during the evaluation cycle consisting of three parts: i) All forms and documents used or contained in the evaluation process; ii) Evaluator-supplied evidence; and iii) Educator-supplied evidence
View SourceView Similar (4)
Record of Evaluation. The parties agree that an effective evaluation process requires meaningful, ongoing, two-way communication. To facilitate this process, the parties agree that each Employee shall have a Record of Evaluation maintained as part of his/her Personnel File, pursuant to Article XXIII – Personnel Files and Evaluation. Each employee's Record of Evaluation shall consist of the ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Memorial Library Evaluation Form (the Evaluation Form) and any other documents used in the evaluation process. All evaluation documents contained in the Record of Evaluation shall remain confidential as personnel records for each member of the bargaining unit, and will not be considered a public record per the Privacy Exemption under the Massachusetts Public Records Law, M.G.L. c. 4, §7(26)(c).
View SourceView Similar (3)
Record of Evaluation a. The parties agree that an effective evaluation process requires meaningful, ongoing, two- way communication. To facilitate this process, the parties agree that each Educator shall have a Record of Evaluation maintained as part of his/her Teacher files/personnel folder (and the equivalent in the TeachPoint System), pursuant to Article 26 –Personnel Practices. All evaluation documents contained in the Record of Evaluation shall remain confidential as personnel records for each member of the bargaining unit, and will not be considered a public record per the Privacy Exemption under the Massachusetts Public Records Law, M.G.L. c. 4, §7(26)(c). Each Educator's Record of Evaluation shall consist of three (3) parts: • All forms and documents used or contained in the evaluation process (or the equivalent in the TeachPoint System). • Evaluator-supplied evidence. • Educator-supplied evidence. b. Standard forms shall include all relevant forms in Appendix G (or the equivalent in the
View SourceView Similar (2)
Record of Evaluation. The parties agree that an effective evaluation process requires meaningful, ongoing, two-way communication. To facilitate this process, the parties agree that each Educator shall have a Record of Evaluation maintained as part of hisIher Teacher files/personnel folder, pursuant to Section 4.11. All evaluation documents contained in the Record of Evaluation shall remain confidential as personnel records for each member of the bargaining unit, and will not be considered a public record per the Privacy Exemption under the Massachusetts Public Records Law, M.G.L. c. 4, §7(26)(c). Each Educator's Record of Evaluation shall consist of three (3) parts:  All forms and documents used or contained in the evaluation process;  Evaluator-supplied evidence; and  Educator-supplied evidence. Standard forms shall include all relevant forms in Appendix F. The other components are described below.
View Source
Record of Evaluation. The parties agree that an effective evaluation process requires meaningful, ongoing, two-way communication. To facilitate this process, the parties agree that each Paraprofessional shall have a Record of Evaluation maintained as part of his/her Personnel File, pursuant to Article XX – Paraprofessional Evaluations/Personnel Files. Each Employee's Record of Evaluation shall consist of the Paraprofessional Evaluation Form and all other documentation (including but not limited to e-mails and other forms) used in the evaluation process. All evaluation documents contained in the Record of Evaluation shall remain confidential as personnel records for each member of the bargaining unit, and will not be considered a public record per the Privacy Exemption under the Massachusetts Public Records Law, M.G.L. c. 4, §7(26)(c).
View Source

Related to Record of Evaluation

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Purpose of Evaluation 10.1.1 It is recognized that a system of evaluation is essential to assist Unit Members in developing competency and realizing their potential. It is further recognized that information gathered through such a system will enable decisions that measure a Unit Member’s performance in a just and equitable manner. 10.1.2 The evaluation procedure is a cooperative process designed to: a. Promote the achievement of goals and objectives of the County Office and its programs through the assessment and evaluation of the staff that perform within that program; b. Provide a formal method of recognizing staff achievement and growth; c. Identify abilities and specific indicators most critical to support job performance; d. Develop suggestions and direction regarding desired performance and improvement based on standards for like positions; e. Increase the employee’s understanding of performance from the supervisor’s viewpoint; and f. Provide a process of two-way communication to evaluate job performance.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • MANAGEMENT OF EVALUATION OUTCOMES 12.1 Where the Employer is, any time during the Employee’s employment, not satisfied with the Employee’s performance with respect to any matter dealt with in this Agreement, the Employer will give notice to the Employee to attend a meeting; 12.2 The Employee will have the opportunity at the meeting to satisfy the Employer of the measures being taken to ensure that his performance becomes satisfactory and any programme, including any dates, for implementing these measures; 12.3 Where there is a dispute or difference as to the performance of the Employee under this Agreement, the Parties will confer with a view to resolving the dispute or difference; and 12.4 In the case of unacceptable performance, the Employer shall – 12.4.1 Provide systematic remedial or developmental support to assist the Employee to improve his performance; and 12.4.2 After appropriate performance counselling and having provided the necessary guidance and/or support as well as reasonable time for improvement in performance, the Employer may consider steps to terminate the contract of employment of the Employee on grounds of unfitness or incapacity to carry out his or her duties.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.