Regular Faculty Evaluation Sample Clauses

The Regular Faculty Evaluation clause establishes a systematic process for assessing the performance and effectiveness of faculty members on a recurring basis. Typically, this involves scheduled reviews—such as annual or biennial evaluations—where faculty are assessed on criteria like teaching quality, research output, and service contributions. The core function of this clause is to ensure accountability, support professional development, and maintain high standards within the academic institution.
Regular Faculty Evaluation. Regular faculty evaluations will occur annually and consist of the student survey, the Faculty Evaluation Document, and a review of all components of the faculty member's portfolio.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Regular Faculty Evaluation. Probationary Regular Faculty (a) All evaluations during the probationary period shall be as follows: at least once per year (no more than twice per year with a minimum of sixty (60) days between), the Administrator responsible will give the faculty member a written evaluation report, after consultation with the current Selection Committee. The evaluation report shall explicitly state whether the faculty member is satisfactory or unsatisfactory. If the faculty member is found to be unsatisfactory for regular employment then the evaluation report shall specify the deficiencies and shall make positive suggestions for each. The standards will be determined by the College. (b) The methods used to collect information, in consultation with the faculty member, will include the following: (i) Written faculty peer evaluation (ii) Written administrator evaluation (iii) Written student evaluations (where applicable) (iv) Written self-evaluation by the probationary faculty member (v) Other methods agreed to by the Selection Committee, and by the Administrator responsible; or, at the initiative of the probationary faculty member, and in consultation with the Selection Committee and Administrator elements of the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ College Teaching Excellence Program may be used to provide information relevant to the probationary evaluation. (c) The Evaluation report will be discussed with the faculty member who will sign a copy indicating that the report has been seen. The faculty member can register agreement or disagreement with the report at this time. (d) Where an evaluation has not been done, then it will be understood that a probationary or contract faculty member has received a satisfactory evaluation.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Regular Faculty Evaluation 
View SourceView Similar (3)

Related to Regular Faculty Evaluation

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.