Report of the Population and Conservation Status Working Group Sample Clauses

Report of the Population and Conservation Status Working Group. 10.1.1 The Co-convenor of the Population and Conservation Status Working Group (PaCSWG), Dr ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, introduced the report of the Second Meeting of the PaCSWG. This report outlined inter-sessional progress against the Work Programme of the PaCSWG adopted at MoP4 in 2012 and amended by the Seventh Meeting of the Advisory Committee (AC7). The report also reflected discussions and advice resulting from the WG meeting (PaCSWG2) held in Punta del Este, Uruguay. 10.1.2 Participants from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador, New Zealand, South Africa, Spain, United Kingdom, Uruguay, Canada, United States, American Bird Conservancy (ABC), BirdLife International, Humane Society International (HIS), and Projeto Albatroz attended the meeting. The full report of the Working Group (AC8 Doc 11) provided a comprehensive record of the inter-sessional progress, a 2014 assessment of the global status and trends of ACAP species, the deliberations of the PaCSWG and the recommendations that the PaCSWG presented to the AC. 10.1.3 The Advisory Committee supported the following recommendations and took note of them when developing the AC Work Programme: i) requested that Parties develop and implement effective biosecurity plans for albatross and petrel breeding sites to minimize the risk of disease transmission; ii) encouraged the implementation of disease surveillance programmes, including in birds obtained as fisheries bycatch; iii) advised Parties to investigate thoroughly albatross disease or mortality events when they occur; iv) develop an MoU between ACAP and the One Health Institute, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, ▇▇▇▇▇; v) requested that ACAP Parties continue to focus on the five high-priority populations that were identified at AC6 as requiring urgent attention; vi) requested the Chair of the AC to submit a letter to the relevant authorities in support of the eradication of the introduced House Mouse at ▇▇▇▇▇ Island, in light of the threat that predation by this species presents to the Tristan Albatross; vii) encouraged Parties and others responsible for breeding populations of ACAP species to implement the monitoring programmes identified as priorities at AC6 in order to increase current knowledge of population size, trends and demography of ACAP species; viii) encouraged Parties, where possible, to undertake or plan for the tracking studies identified as priorities to take place; ix) requested Parties inform BirdLife Internati...
View Source
Report of the Population and Conservation Status Working Group. 9.1.1 The Co-convenor of the Population and Conservation Status Working Group (PaCSWG), Prof ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, introduced the report of the Fifth Meeting of the PaCSWG (AC11 Doc 09). This report outlined intersessional progress against the Work Programme of the PaCSWG adopted at MoP6 in 2018, and also reflected discussions and advice resulting from the meeting (PaCSWG5) held from 9 to 10 May 2019 in Florianópolis, Brazil. 9.1.2 The Advisory Committee agreed the following advice based on recommendations from PaCSWG5 and took note of it when updating the AC Work Programme:
View Source
Report of the Population and Conservation Status Working Group. 11.1.1 The Co-convenor of the Population and Conservation Status Working Group (PaCSWG), Dr ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, introduced the report of the Fourth Meeting of the PaCSWG (AC10 Doc 11). This report outlined inter-sessional progress against the Work Programme of the PaCSWG adopted at MoP5 in 2015 and amended by AC9. The report also reflected discussions and advice resulting from the WG meeting (PaCSWG4) held in Wellington, New Zealand, from 7 to 8 September 2017. 11.1.2 The Advisory Committee supported the following recommendations and took note of them when developing the AC Work Programme:
View Source

Related to Report of the Population and Conservation Status Working Group

  • Please see the current Washtenaw Community College catalog for up-to-date program requirements Conditions & Requirements

  • How to File an Appeal of a Prescription Drug Denial For denials of a prescription drug claim based on our determination that the service was not medically necessary or appropriate, or that the service was experimental or investigational, you may request an appeal without first submitting a request for reconsideration. You or your physician may file a written or verbal prescription drug appeal with our pharmacy benefits manager (PBM). The prescription drug appeal must be submitted to us within one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the initial determination letter. You will receive written notification of our determination within thirty (30) calendar days from the receipt of your appeal. Your appeal may require immediate action if a delay in treatment could seriously jeopardize your health or your ability to regain maximum function, or would cause you severe pain. To request an expedited appeal of a denial related to services that have not yet been rendered (a preauthorization review) or for on-going services (a concurrent review), you or your healthcare provider should call: • our Grievance and Appeals Unit; or • our pharmacy benefits manager for a prescription drug appeal. Please see Section 9 for contact information. You will be notified of our decision no later than seventy-two (72) hours after our receipt of the request. You may not request an expedited review of covered healthcare services already received.

  • Human and Financial Resources to Implement Safeguards Requirements The Borrower shall make available necessary budgetary and human resources to fully implement the EMP and the RP.

  • Cloud Computing State Risk and Authorization Management Program (TX-RAMP In accordance with Senate Bill 475, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., pursuant to Texas Government Code, Section 2054.0593, Contractor acknowledges and agrees that, if providing cloud computing services for System Agency, Contractor must comply with the requirements of the state risk and authorization management program and that System Agency may not enter or renew a contract with Contractor to purchase cloud computing services for the agency that are subject to the state risk and authorization management program unless Contractor demonstrates compliance with program requirements. If providing cloud computing services for System Agency that are subject to the state risk and authorization management program, Contractor certifies it will maintain program compliance and certification throughout the term of the Contract.

  • PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND EDUCATIONAL IMPROVEMENT A. Both the Board and the Association encourage teachers to seek professional improvement. In order to assist teachers in extending and improving their skills the following plan will be implemented. B. All Teachers will be encouraged to earn a Masters degree or coursework toward additional certification that is in the field of education and within a teacher's discipline, or in an area that is beneficial to the school. C. The Board will pay teacher's expenses for undergraduate and/or graduate credits, specialty and additional endorsements under the following conditions. 1. In allocating budgeted funds priority will be given to the teachers in a “masters” program and those teachers who need to complete coursework for certification. 2. All courses must be approved, in advance, by the Superintendent. Courses for recertification purposes must be approved in advance by the certification committee and the superintendent. The teacher shall receive a written reply from the Superintendent within ten (10) days of application for course approval (See Appendix D). 3. Each teacher will be eligible for up to six (6) semester hours of credit or, if enrolled in a matriculated, organized program, 12 semester hours of credit for undergraduate will be paid if part of a graduate program or graduate courses per contract year. The Superintendent reserves the right to request intent to take courses prior to final budget preparation. Failure to communicate such intent at the time of the Superintendent’s request may jeopardize course reimbursement due to a lack of funding. 4. The administration will pay in advance the cost of the course. Presentation of evidence of satisfactory completion of the course (A grade of B or better) is the responsibility of the teacher. In the event the course is not completed or not completed satisfactorily, the teacher will refund the payment received in advance and in accordance with Appendix D – attached. 5. Teachers who resign shall not be eligible for reimbursement after the date of resignation Teachers who have been reimbursed for any course work toward securing a masters within the last two (2) years of employment shall be required to continue their service to RSU # 78 for an additional two (2) years (twenty-four months) or will be required to reimburse the district the cost associated with Masters courses taken prior to departing, Such reimbursement to the district shall be remitted via payroll deductions as arranged between the District and employee, unless the failure to continue employment is due to illness, disability, death, or reduction of position. 6. Reimbursement will only be for tuition and fees. It will not include reimbursement for mileage, books and other expenses unless the teacher is required to take the course by the administration.