Threats and prioritisation Sample Clauses

The 'Threats and prioritisation' clause establishes a process for identifying, assessing, and ranking potential risks or threats relevant to the agreement or project. Typically, this clause requires the parties to regularly review possible threats, evaluate their likelihood and impact, and prioritize them based on agreed criteria, such as severity or urgency. By formalizing how threats are managed and prioritized, the clause ensures that the most significant risks are addressed proactively, thereby minimizing potential disruptions and enhancing overall risk management.
Threats and prioritisation. (i) Reiterate the importance of ACAP Parties taking all feasible action to protect breeding sites, in particular by preventing the introduction of, or, if already present, ensuring the control or eradication of non-native species that may be detrimental to populations of albatrosses and petrels. (ii) Encourage more research on sub-lethal effects of pollutants, and the incorporation of these impacts when modelling population trends.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Threats and prioritisation. (i) Commended the advances that are being achieved in planning and implementing large-scale eradication programmes for non-native species that will ultimately benefit the status of ACAP species. (ii) Recognised the importance of mapping areas of greatest overlap and potential bycatch risk, including for higher risk and bycatch-aggravating species such as White-chinned Petrels, Procellaria aequinoctialis (which are deeper divers and more nocturnally active), and for birds of different age and sex in order to identify higher risk regions where increased enforcement of compliance with bird bycatch mitigation requirements and improved bycatch monitoring are required. (iii) Encouraged further research on the possible effects of noise pollution on the distribution and abundance of ACAP species at sea. (iv) Encouraged data-holders to submit their tracking data to the BirdLife International Seabird Tracking Database to enable analyses of overlap and interactions between ACAP species and fisheries.
View Source
Threats and prioritisation. (i) Commended the advances that are being achieved by Parties and Range States in planning and implementing large-scale eradication programmes for non-native species that will ultimately benefit the conservation status of ACAP species. (ii) Recognised the importance of mapping areas of greatest overlap and potential bycatch risk, including for albatrosses and petrels of different age and sex, in order to identify higher risk regions where enhanced seabird bycatch mitigation and improved bycatch monitoring are required. (iii) Endorsed the inclusion of Antipodean Albatrosses (Diomedea antipodensis) breeding on Antipodes Island as an ACAP Priority Population for conservation management. (iv) Supported ensuring that actions in the work plan for engagement with RFMOs and other conservation bodies include a focus on advancing the conservation of the Priority Populations.
View Source
Threats and prioritisation i. recognised the advances that are being achieved in planning and implementing large-scale eradication programmes of non-native species that will ultimately benefit the status of ACAP species; ii. encouraged the thorough documentation and dissemination of details of eradication programmes, including non-target impacts and mitigation, so that lessons and benefits can be widely applied in the future; iii. requested that Parties ensure that stringent bio-security protocols are in place, conforming to the ACAP Biosecurity Guidelines, to prevent introductions or re-introductions of non-native species at ACAP breeding sites; iv. explored the means by which ACAP and ACAP Parties could support the eradication of the introduced House Mouse at ▇▇▇▇▇ Island in light of the threat that predation by this species presents to the Critically Endangered ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇; v. requested that Parties collaborate in projects analysing overlap and interactions between seabirds and fisheries, and relationships between changes in fishing effort and demography, by the provision of high resolution data on fishing effort; vi. encouraged research assessing the exposure to, and incidence and impacts of plastics and microplastics in the marine environment on ACAP species; vii. endorsed the addition of the Grey-headed Albatross at South Georgia (Islas Georgias del Sur)1, Indian Yellow-nosed Albatross at Amsterdam Island, Balearic Shearwater at the Balearic Islands, and Waved Albatross at Española Island to, and the removal of Sooty Albatross at ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Islands from, the list of ACAP high priority populations; and viii. requested that ACAP Parties develop a list of actions that identify priority research and conservation activities for each of the high priority populations, and report to each AC meeting on progress in implementing those activities.
View Source

Related to Threats and prioritisation

  • Prioritization All Services will be implemented and/or facilitated (as applicable) on a schedule, and in a prioritized manner, as we determine reasonable and necessary. Exact commencement / start dates may vary or deviate from the dates we state to you depending on the Services being provided and the extent to which prerequisites (if any), such as transition or onboarding activities, must be completed.

  • Composition and Priority The Contractor agrees to provide commodities or contractual services to the Customer as specified in the Contract. Additionally, the terms of the Contract supersede the terms of all prior agreements between the Parties on this subject matter.

  • Perfection and Priority The security interest granted pursuant to this Agreement constitutes a valid and continuing perfected security interest in favor of the Collateral Agent for the benefit of the Secured Parties in all Collateral subject, for the following Collateral, to the occurrence of the following: (i) in the case of all Collateral in which a security interest may be perfected by filing a financing statement under the UCC, the completion of the filings specified on Schedule 2 (which, in the case of all filings referred to on such schedule, have been duly authorized by each Grantor and delivered to the Collateral Agent in completed form), (ii) with respect to any deposit account, the execution of a Control Agreement, (iii) in the case of all Copyrights, Trademarks and Patents for which UCC filings are insufficient, all appropriate filings having been made with the Applicable IP Office, (iv) in the case of letter-of-credit rights that are not supporting obligations of Collateral, the execution of a Contractual Obligation granting control to the Collateral Agent over such letter-of-credit rights, and (v) in the case of electronic chattel paper, the completion of all steps necessary to grant control to the Collateral Agent over such electronic chattel paper. Such security interest shall be prior to all other Liens on the Collateral except for Customary Permitted Liens having priority over the Collateral Agent’s Lien by operation of law or permitted pursuant to clause (c), (e) or (j) of the definition of “Customary Permitted Liens” in the Credit Agreement or subsection 8.2(c), 8.2(d), 8.2(e), 8.2(f) or 8.2(h) of the Credit Agreement upon (i) in the case of all Pledged Certificated Stock, Pledged Debt Instruments and Pledged Investment Property, the delivery thereof to the Collateral Agent of such Pledged Certificated Stock, Pledged Debt Instruments and Pledged Investment Property consisting of instruments and certificates, in each case properly endorsed for transfer to the Collateral Agent or in blank, (ii) in the case of all Pledged Investment Property not in certificated form, the execution of a Control Agreement with respect to such investment property, and (iii) in the case of all other instruments and tangible chattel paper that are not Pledged Certificated Stock, Pledged Debt Instruments or Pledged Investment Property, the delivery to the Collateral Agent of such instruments and tangible chattel paper. Except as set forth in this Section 4.2, all actions by each Grantor necessary to perfect the Lien granted hereunder on the Collateral have been duly taken.

  • Creation, Perfection and Priority of Liens The execution and delivery of the Collateral Documents by Loan Parties, together with (i) the actions taken to date pursuant to the Existing Credit Agreement and subsections 4.1I, 6.8 and 6.9 hereof and (ii) the delivery to Collateral Agent of any Pledged Collateral not delivered to Collateral Agent at the time of execution and delivery of the applicable Collateral Document (all of which Pledged Collateral has been so delivered) are effective to create or to continue in favor of Collateral Agent for the benefit of Beneficiaries, as security for the respective Secured Obligations, a valid First Priority Lien on all of the Collateral (except as indicated in the applicable Collateral Document), and all filings and other actions necessary or desirable to perfect and maintain the perfection and First Priority status of such Liens have been duly made or taken and remain in full force and effect, other than the filing of any UCC financing statements and PTO filings delivered to Collateral Agent on the Effective Date for filing (but not yet filed), the periodic filing of UCC continuation statements in respect of UCC financing statements filed by or on behalf of Collateral Agent and the amendments or modifications to the Mortgages described in subsection 6.9(D) or permitted alternatives thereto.

  • Safety Precautions Resident acknowledges that neither Owner nor any of its agents, employees or representatives has made any representations or warranties, either written or oral, concerning the safety of the Property, the bedroom space or any apartment, or the effectiveness or operability of any security devices or safety, health or security measures at the Property, the bedroom space or any apartment. Resident acknowledges that Owner neither warrants nor guarantees the safety or security of residents or their Guests against any criminal or wrongful acts of third parties. Resident and his or her Guests are responsible for protecting their own respective person and property and hereby release Owner and its agents, employees and representatives for any and all damage to person and property. Owner’s safety measures are neither a warranty of safety nor a guaranty against crime or of a reduced risk of crime. Resident acknowledges that security devices or measures may be changed or removed by Owner without notice or compensation, and/or may fail or be thwarted by criminals or by electrical or mechanical malfunctions. Therefore, Resident acknowledges that he or she should not rely on such devices or measures and should take steps to protect himself or herself and his or her existing property notwithstanding these devices. Resident agrees to immediately notify Owner’s representative of any malfunctions involving locks and life-safety building components. Should Resident become seriously injured or imperiled at the Property, Resident authorizes Owner and its agents to call 911 Emergency at Resident’s expense, without legal obligation to do so.