REPORTING AND DECISION MAKING Sample Clauses

REPORTING AND DECISION MAKING. 9.1 The Panel will prepare a report under section 52 of the NEB Act setting out its recommendation on whether a certificate of public convenience and necessity should be issued taking into account whether the project is and will be required by the present and future public convenience and necessity, the reasons for the recommendations, as well as the terms and conditions that the Panel considers necessary or desirable in the public interest to which the certificate will be subject if the Governor in Council were to direct the Board to issue the certificate. The report will also set out the Panel’s rationale, conclusions and recommendations relating to the environmental assessment of the project, including any mitigation measures and follow-up programs and a summary of any comments received from the public and Aboriginal peoples, as well as information referred to in Section 8. The report will also identify: ▪ those conclusions that relate to the environmental effects to be taken into account under section 5 of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012; and ▪ recommended mitigation measures that relate to the environmental effects to be taken into account under section 5 of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012. 9.2 Once completed, the report will be submitted to the Minister of Natural Resources who will make it available to the public and Aboriginal peoples. 9.3 The Governor in Council will make the decision on the environmental assessment (whether the project is likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects and if so, whether such effects are justified in the circumstances). The Governor in Council will also decide, by order, whether the Board should issue a certificate and will give reasons for the order.
REPORTING AND DECISION MAKING. 9.1 The Panel will prepare a report setting out its rationale, conclusions and recommendations relating to the environmental assessment of the project, including any mitigation measures and follow-up programs and a summary of any comments received from the public and Aboriginal peoples, as well as information referred to in Section 8. 9.2 Once completed, the report will be submitted to the Minister of the Environment who will make it available to the public and Aboriginal peoples. 9.3 Following the Governor in Council approval of the government response to the report, the Panel will issue its Reasons for Decision pursuant to the NEB Act.
REPORTING AND DECISION MAKING. The panel produces an assessment report and a recommendation to the CAB, which must make decisions in accordance with Rules 12 -15. Natural justice provisions require that if the CAB intends to decline an application, it must first inform the applicant and give him or her the opportunity to provide a further written submission, which the CAB must consider when making its decision. Thus there is considerable opportunity for the applicant to ensure that their best evidence is presented and properly assessed.
REPORTING AND DECISION MAKING a. The Joint Review Panel shall prepare and submit a report in accordance with subsection 4.8 of the Schedule to this Agreement. b. The Joint Review Panel report shall be made available to the public. c. Following the submission of its report, the Joint Review Panel shall remain available for further consideration and for consultation, as may be required under sections 135 and 137 of the MVRMA, or for clarification of any of the recommendations set out in the report, as may be required under subsection 37(1.1) of the CEAA. d. In accordance with subsections 136(2) and 137(3) of the MVRMA, a first nation, local government, regulatory authority or department or agency of the federal or territorial government in the Mackenzie Valley and the NEB shall act in conformity with any recommendation accepted by the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development or the NEB. e. In accordance with subsection 37(1.1) of the CEAA, responsible authorities shall act in conformity with the approval by the Governor-in-Council of their response to the Environmental Impact Review report.
REPORTING AND DECISION MAKING a) The Joint Review Panel shall prepare and submit a report in accordance with section 4.8 of the Schedule to this Agreement. b) The Joint Review Panel report shall be made available to the public at the same time it is provided to the Parties. The Panel report will be published and translated into French and Aboriginal languages, including audio/video formats as required. Prior to the announcement of its release to the public, the Secretariat will place embargoed copies of the report in the communities of Trout Lake, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ River, Fort Simpson, Wrigley, Tulita, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, Fort Good Hope, Tsiigehtchic, Inuvik, and Tuktoyaktuk and in other locations as appropriate to ensure timely availability on public release. The Panel report will be made available to the residents of the named communities immediately following the announcement of the public release of the Panel report. Copies will be available to the general public on request. c) Following the submission of its report, the Joint Review Panel shall remain available for conducting further review or for consultation, as may be required under sections 135 and 137 of the MVRMA, or for clarification of any of the recommendations set out in the report, as may be required under subsection 37(1.1) of the CEAA. Effect of the Decision d) In accordance with subsections 136(2) and 137(3) of the MVRMA, a first nation, local government, regulatory authority or department or agency in the Mackenzie Valley and the National Energy Board shall act in conformity with any recommendation accepted by the federal minister, the National Energy Board, and the Deh Cho First Nations within their respective jurisdictions. e) In accordance with subsection 37(1.1) of the CEAA, responsible authorities shall act in conformity with the approval of their response to the Environmental Impact Review report by the Governor-in-Council.

Related to REPORTING AND DECISION MAKING

  • Decision Making The Joint Development Committee and Joint Commercialization Committee shall each act by unanimous agreement of its members, with each Party having one vote. If the Joint Development Committee or Joint Commercialization Committee, after [* * *] (or such other period as the Parties may otherwise agree) of good faith efforts to reach a unanimous decision on an issue, fails to reach such a unanimous decision, then either Party may refer such issue to the Executive Officers. Such Executive Officers shall meet promptly thereafter and shall negotiate in good faith to resolve the issues. If Executive Officers cannot resolve such issue within [* * *] of referral of such issue to the Executive Officers, the resolution of such issue shall be as follows: (a) if such issue properly originated at the Joint Development Committee, determined by the Developing Party of the relevant Licensed Compound or Licensed Product at issue; provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing: (i) if Acceleron is the Developing Party and such issue relates to (x) the approval of an Additional Development Disease, or (y) matters under Section 5.6.3(d), then such issue shall be determined by [* * *]; (ii) regardless of which Party is the Developing Party, such issue shall be determined by [* * *] following the earliest of: (x) [* * *], and (y) the Joint Development Committee’s decision to go forward with a Phase 3 Clinical Trial of the relevant Licensed Compound or Licensed Product; provided that [* * *] shall continue to determine any issues that relate to the budget for and the conduct of the [* * *]; and (iii) regardless of which Party is the Developing Party, such issue shall be determined by [* * *] following the earliest of: (x) [* * *], and (y) the occurrence of any [* * *]; and (b) if such issue properly originated at the Joint Commercialization Committee, determined by Celgene. Notwithstanding the foregoing, none of Acceleron, Celgene, the Joint Development Committee or the Joint Commercialization Committee may make any decision inconsistent with the express terms of this Agreement without the prior written consent of each Party.

  • Reporting and Payment Procedures 1. Payment Procedures

  • Initial Decision Maker The Architect will serve as the Initial Decision Maker pursuant to Article 15 of AIA Document A201–2017, unless the parties appoint below another individual, not a party to this Agreement, to serve as the Initial Decision Maker.

  • Introduction and Statement of Policy The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has established NIH-designated data repositories (e.g., database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP), Sequence Read Archive (SRA), NIH Established Trusted Partnerships) for securely storing and sharing controlled-access human data submitted to NIH under the NIH Genomic Data Sharing (GDS)

  • Automated decisions For purposes hereof “automated decision” shall mean a decision by the data exporter or the data importer which produces legal effects concerning a data subject or significantly affects a data subject and which is based solely on automated processing of personal data intended to evaluate certain personal aspects relating to him, such as his performance at work, creditworthiness, reliability, conduct, etc. The data importer shall not make any automated decisions concerning data subjects, except when: a) i. such decisions are made by the data importer in entering into or performing a contract with the data subject, and